Kerstin A Kessel1,2, Hanna Fischer3,4, Marco M E Vogel3,4, Markus Oechsner3, Henning Bier5, Bernhard Meyer6, Stephanie E Combs3,4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. Kerstin.Kessel@tum.de. 2. Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany. Kerstin.Kessel@tum.de. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. 4. Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg, Germany. 5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiotherapy (RT) has been established as a valid treatment alternative in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). There is ongoing controversy regarding the optimal fractionation. Hearing preservation may be the primary goal for patients with VS, followed by maintenance of quality of life (QoL). METHODS: From 2002 to 2015, 184 patients with VS were treated with radiosurgery (RS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). A survey on current symptoms and QoL was conducted between February and June 2016. RESULTS: Median follow-up after RT was 7.5 years (range 0-14.4 years). Mean overall survival (OS) after RT was 31.1 years, with 94 and 87% survival at 5 and 10 years, respectively [corrected]. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.3 years, with 5‑ and 10-year PFS of 92%. Hearing could be preserved in RS patients for a median of 36.3 months (range 2.3-13.7 years). Hearing worsened in 17 (30%) cases. Median hearing preservation for FSRT was 48.7 months (range 0.0-13.8 years); 29 (23%) showed hearing deterioration. The difference in hearing preservation was not significant between RS and FSRT (p = 0.3). A total of 123/162 patients participated in the patient survey (return rate 76%). The results correlate well with the information documented in the patient files for tinnitus and facial and trigeminal nerve toxicity. Significant differences appeared regarding hearing impairment, gait uncertainty, and imbalance. CONCLUSION: These data confirm that RS and FSRT are comparable in terms of local control for VS. RS should be reserved for smaller lesions, while FSRT can be offered independently of tumor size. Patient self-reported outcome during follow-up is of high value. The established questionnaire could be validated in the independent cohort.
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiotherapy (RT) has been established as a valid treatment alternative in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). There is ongoing controversy regarding the optimal fractionation. Hearing preservation may be the primary goal for patients with VS, followed by maintenance of quality of life (QoL). METHODS: From 2002 to 2015, 184 patients with VS were treated with radiosurgery (RS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). A survey on current symptoms and QoL was conducted between February and June 2016. RESULTS: Median follow-up after RT was 7.5 years (range 0-14.4 years). Mean overall survival (OS) after RT was 31.1 years, with 94 and 87% survival at 5 and 10 years, respectively [corrected]. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.3 years, with 5‑ and 10-year PFS of 92%. Hearing could be preserved in RS patients for a median of 36.3 months (range 2.3-13.7 years). Hearing worsened in 17 (30%) cases. Median hearing preservation for FSRT was 48.7 months (range 0.0-13.8 years); 29 (23%) showed hearing deterioration. The difference in hearing preservation was not significant between RS and FSRT (p = 0.3). A total of 123/162 patients participated in the patient survey (return rate 76%). The results correlate well with the information documented in the patient files for tinnitus and facial and trigeminal nerve toxicity. Significant differences appeared regarding hearing impairment, gait uncertainty, and imbalance. CONCLUSION: These data confirm that RS and FSRT are comparable in terms of local control for VS. RS should be reserved for smaller lesions, while FSRT can be offered independently of tumor size. Patient self-reported outcome during follow-up is of high value. The established questionnaire could be validated in the independent cohort.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patient self-reported outcome; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Survial; Toxicity
Authors: Brendan M Fong; Patrick Pezeshkian; Daniel T Nagasawa; Antonio De Salles; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Stephanie E Combs; Thomas Welzel; Daniela Schulz-Ertner; Peter E Huber; Jürgen Debus Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Stephanie E Combs; Thomas Welzel; Kerstin Kessel; Daniel Habermehl; Stefan Rieken; Oliver Schramm; Jürgen Debus Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: John G Golfinos; Travis C Hill; Rae Rokosh; Osamah Choudhry; Matthew Shinseki; Alireza Mansouri; David R Friedmann; J Thomas Roland; Douglas Kondziolka Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Colin E Champ; Xinglei Shen; Wenyin Shi; Sonal U Mayekar; Katherine Chapman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Christopher J Farrell; Vicki Gunn; M Beverly Downes; Haisong Liu; James J Evans; David W Andrews Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Michael Huo; Heath Foley; Mark Pinkham; Mihir Shanker; Anne Bernard; Michael Jenkins; Sarah Olson; Bruce Hall; Trevor Watkins; Catherine Jones; Matthew Foote Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2020
Authors: Roland Goldbrunner; Michael Weller; Jean Regis; Morten Lund-Johansen; Pantelis Stavrinou; David Reuss; D Gareth Evans; Florence Lefranc; Kita Sallabanda; Andrea Falini; Patrick Axon; Olivier Sterkers; Laura Fariselli; Wolfgang Wick; Joerg-Christian Tonn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Rebekka C E Grosser; Kim Melanie Kraus; Hans Hoffmann; Markus Oechsner; Stephanie E Combs Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Christian D Diehl; Markus Oechsner; Bernhard Meyer; Jens Gempt; Claus Zimmer; Friederike Schmidt-Graf; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 6.639