| Literature DB >> 27803400 |
Akira Kurozumi1, Yosuke Okada, Tadashi Arao, Yoshiya Tanaka.
Abstract
Objective Visceral fat obesity and metabolic syndrome correlate with atherosclerosis in part due to insulin resistance and various other factors. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between vascular endothelial dysfunction and excess visceral adipose tissue (VAT) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods In 71 T2DM patients, the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) was measured using an Endo-PAT 2000, and VAT and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were measured via CT. We also measured various metabolic markers, including high-molecular-weight adiponectin (HMW-AN). Results VAT correlated negatively with the natural logarithm of RHI (L_RHI), the primary endpoint (p=0.042, r=-0.242). L_RHI did not correlate with SAT, VAT/SAT, abdominal circumference, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance, urinary C-peptide reactivity, HMW-AN, or alanine amino transferase, the secondary endpoints. A linear multivariate analysis via the forced entry method using age, sex, VAT, and smoking history as independent variables and L_RHI as the dependent variable revealed a lack of any determinants of L_RHI. Conclusion Excess VAT worsens the vascular endothelial function, represented by RHI which was analyzed using Endo-PAT, in Japanese patients with T2DM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27803400 PMCID: PMC5140855 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.6940
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.271
Baseline Characteristics and Laboratory Data of All Patients.
| Parameter | Mean ± SD (range) | Parameter | Mean ± SD (range) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male: female) | (37:34) | HbA1c (%) | 9.0 ± 1.8 (6.2-13.7) |
| Age (years) | 56.5 ± 12.1 (22-84) | FPG (mg/dL) | 152.6 ± 49.0 (74-306) |
| Diabetic duration (years) | 5.7 ± 6.2 (1-22) | HOMA-IR | 3.2 ± 2.9 (0.4-13.5) |
| Body weight (kg) | 66.9 ± 18.0 (38.0-140.0) | u-C peptide (μg/day) | 78.4 ± 56.3 (8.8-297.8) |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 26.0 ± 6.0 (16.7-53.8) | AST (IU/L) | 30.2 ± 26.2 (9-188) |
| AC (cm) | 92.7 ± 13.9 (61-154) | ALT (IU/L) | 36.3 ± 32.1 (6-207) |
| VAT (cm2) | 144.0 ± 63.4 (7-352) | γ-GTP (IU/L) | 68.3 ± 92.7 (4-553) |
| SAT (cm2) | 186.0 ± 119.9 (13-650) | Cre (mg/dL) | 0.7 ± 0.2 (0.3-1.4) |
| V/S | 0.95 ± 0.51 (0.22-3.04) | eGFR (mL/min) | 90.0 ± 28.2 (39.2-212.6) |
| SBP (mmHg) | 128.7 ± 21.2 (90-199) | LDL-C (mg/dL) | 123.9 ± 36.5 (65-249) |
| DBP (mmHg) | 73.5 ± 11.9 (44-100) | HDL-C (mg/dL) | 49.6 ± 14.1 (29-94) |
| Use of sulfonyl urea | 20/28.2 | TG (mg/dL) | 165.4 ± 120.5 (59-809) |
| (N/%) | |||
| Use of DPP4-I (N/%) | 28/39.4 | L_RHI | 0.56 ± 0.24 (0.03-1.03) |
| Use of statin (N/%) | 25/35.2 | RHI | 1.80 ± 0.44 (1.03-2.81) |
| Use of ARB (N/%) | 21/29.6 | HMW-AN (μg/mL) | 5.0 ± 7.0 (0.2-52.5) |
Data are mean ± SD or number (range: minimum-maximum).
HbA1c levels were converted to NGSP levels (formula: NGSP = JDS + 0.4%).
AC: abdominal circumference, VAT: visceral adipose tissues, SAT: subcutaneous adipose tissues, V/S: VAT SAT ratio, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, DPP4-I: Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4-inhibitor, ARB: angiotensin II receptor blocker, HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c, FPG: fasting plasma glucose, HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance, AST: aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, γ-GTP: γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, LDL: lowdensity lipoprotein, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, TG: triglyceride, L_RHI: the natural logarithmic scaled reactive hyperemia index, HMW-AN: high molecular weight-adiponectin
Figure.Results of a univariate analysis using the Pearson correlation analysis for normally distributed variables and Spearman rank correlation for variables with skewed distribution. Correlation was assessed between excess visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and (A) natural logarithmic reactive hyperemia index (L_RHI), (B) high-molecular-weight adiponectin (HMW-AN), (C) homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), (D) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and (E) urinary C-peptide reactivity (u-CPR).
Univariate Linear Regression Analysis for Predicting L_RHI.
| Variable | Univariate Analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| r | p value | |
| Age | -0.135 | 0.261 |
| Duration of diabetes | -0.017 | 0.891 |
| Body mass index | -0.041 | 0.733 |
| AC | -0.057 | 0.637 |
| VAT | -0.242 | 0.042 |
| SAT | -0.003 | 0.979 |
| VAT/SAT | -0.139 | 0.248 |
| HbA1c | -0.057 | 0.638 |
| FPG | -0.131 | 0.277 |
| HOMA-IR | -0.054 | 0.659 |
| u-C peptide | -0.087 | 0.483 |
| AST | -0.021 | 0.864 |
| ALT | -0.063 | 0.599 |
| AST/ALT | 0.026 | 0.832 |
| γ-GTP | -0.067 | 0.577 |
| eGFR | 0.053 | 0.658 |
| LDL-C | 0.015 | 0.899 |
| HDL-C | 0.038 | 0.755 |
| TG | 0.067 | 0.577 |
| HMW-AN | 0.130 | 0.280 |
Abbreviations as in Table 1.
With regard to univariate analysis, we used Pearson correlation analysis for normally distributed variables and Spearman rank correlation for variables with skewed distribution.