Adriane Martin Hilber1, Carolyn Blake2, Leah F Bohle2, Sarah Bandali3, Esther Agbon4, Louise Hulton3. 1. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: adriane.martinhilber@unibas.ch. 2. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 3. Evidence for Action, Options Consultancy Services Ltd, London, UK. 4. Evidence for Action, Options Consultancy Services Ltd, Abuja, Nigeria.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the types of maternal and newborn health program accountability mechanisms implemented and evaluated in recent years in Sub-Saharan Africa, how these have been implemented, their effectiveness, and future prospects to improve governance and MNH outcomes. METHOD: A structured review selected 38 peer-reviewed papers between 2006 and 2016 in Sub-Saharan Africa to include in the analysis. RESULTS: Performance accountability in MNH through maternal and perinatal death surveillance was the most common accountability mechanism used. Political and democratic accountability through advocacy, human rights, and global tracking of progress on indicators achieved greatest results when multiple stakeholders were involved. Financial accountability can be effective but depend on external support. Overall, this review shows that accountability is more effective when clear expectations are backed by social and political advocacy and multistakeholder engagement, and supported by incentives for positive action. CONCLUSION: There are few accountability mechanisms in MNH in Sub-Saharan Africa between decision-makers and those affected by those decisions with both the power and the will to enforce answerability. Increasing accountability depends not only on how mechanisms are enforced but also, on how providers and managers understand accountability. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: To describe the types of maternal and newborn health program accountability mechanisms implemented and evaluated in recent years in Sub-Saharan Africa, how these have been implemented, their effectiveness, and future prospects to improve governance and MNH outcomes. METHOD: A structured review selected 38 peer-reviewed papers between 2006 and 2016 in Sub-Saharan Africa to include in the analysis. RESULTS: Performance accountability in MNH through maternal and perinatal death surveillance was the most common accountability mechanism used. Political and democratic accountability through advocacy, human rights, and global tracking of progress on indicators achieved greatest results when multiple stakeholders were involved. Financial accountability can be effective but depend on external support. Overall, this review shows that accountability is more effective when clear expectations are backed by social and political advocacy and multistakeholder engagement, and supported by incentives for positive action. CONCLUSION: There are few accountability mechanisms in MNH in Sub-Saharan Africa between decision-makers and those affected by those decisions with both the power and the will to enforce answerability. Increasing accountability depends not only on how mechanisms are enforced but also, on how providers and managers understand accountability. Copyright Â
Keywords:
Accountability; Advocacy; Evidence for Action (E4A); Health systems strengthening; Maternal health; Neonatal health; Quality of Care; Sub-Saharan Africa
Authors: Margaret E Kruk; Anna D Gage; Catherine Arsenault; Keely Jordan; Hannah H Leslie; Sanam Roder-DeWan; Olusoji Adeyi; Pierre Barker; Bernadette Daelmans; Svetlana V Doubova; Mike English; Ezequiel García-Elorrio; Frederico Guanais; Oye Gureje; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Lixin Jiang; Edward Kelley; Ephrem Tekle Lemango; Jerker Liljestrand; Address Malata; Tanya Marchant; Malebona Precious Matsoso; John G Meara; Manoj Mohanan; Youssoupha Ndiaye; Ole F Norheim; K Srinath Reddy; Alexander K Rowe; Joshua A Salomon; Gagan Thapa; Nana A Y Twum-Danso; Muhammad Pate Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Mary V Kinney; David Roger Walugembe; Phillip Wanduru; Peter Waiswa; Asha George Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2021-06-25 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: M V Kinney; L T Day; F Palestra; A Biswas; D Jackson; N Roos; A de Jonge; P Doherty; A A Manu; A C Moran; A S George Journal: BJOG Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 7.331
Authors: Elsbet Lodenstein; Eric Mafuta; Adolphe C Kpatchavi; Jean Servais; Marjolein Dieleman; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Alpha Amadou Bano Barry; Thérèse M N Mambu; Jurrien Toonen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Taryn Vian; Rachel M Fong; Jeanette L Kaiser; Misheck Bwalya; Viviane I R Sakanga; Thandiwe Ngoma; Nancy A Scott Journal: Int J Health Policy Manag Date: 2022-02-01