Literature DB >> 27802079

Mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with UCLP: A 3-D preliminary assessment.

Marilia Yatabe, Daniela Garib, Renato Faco, Hugo de Clerck, Bernardo Souki, Guilherme Janson, Tung Nguyen, Lucia Cevidanes, Antonio Ruellas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess mandibular and glenoid fossa (GF) changes after bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) therapy in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cleft group (CG) comprised 19 patients with (mean initial age of 11.8 years). The noncleft group (NCG) comprised 24 patients without clefts (mean initial age of 11.7 years). Both groups had Class III malocclusion and were treated with BAMP therapy for 18 and 12 months, respectively. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exams were performed before and after treatment and superimposed on the anterior cranial fossa (ACF). Mandibular rotations and three-dimensional linear displacements of the mandible and GF were quantified. A t-test corrected for multiple testing (Holm-Bonferroni method) and a paired t-test were used to compare, respectively, the CG and NCG and cleft vs noncleft sides (P < .05).
RESULTS: Immediately after active treatment, the GF was displaced posteriorly and laterally in both groups relative to the ACF. The overall GF changes in the CG were significantly smaller than in the NCG. Condylar displacement was similar in both groups, following a posterior and lateral direction. The gonial angle was displaced similarly posteriorly, laterally, and inferiorly in both groups. The intercondylar line rotated in opposite directions in the CG and NCG groups. In the CG, most changes of the GF and mandible were symmetrical.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall GF and mandibular changes after BAMP therapy were similar in patients with and without clefts. The exception was the posterior remodeling of the GF that was slightly smaller in patients with UCLP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angle Class III; Cleft lip; Cleft palate; Orthodontic anchorage procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27802079      PMCID: PMC5497313          DOI: 10.2319/052516-419.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  24 in total

1.  Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy.

Authors:  T Baccetti; L Franchi; J A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Three-dimensional assessment of mandibular and glenoid fossa changes after bone-anchored Class III intermaxillary traction.

Authors:  Hugo De Clerck; Tung Nguyen; Leonardo Koerich de Paula; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate.

Authors:  M Mars; D A Plint; W J Houston; O Bergland; G Semb
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1987-10

5.  The cephalometric, anatomic, and histologic changes in Macaca mulatta after application of a continuous-acting retraction force on the mandible.

Authors:  E K Janzen; J A Bluher
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1965-11

6.  Craniofacial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  H Aduss
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Common 3-dimensional coordinate system for assessment of directional changes.

Authors:  Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Cristiano Tonello; Liliane Rosas Gomes; Marilia Sayako Yatabe; Lucie Macron; Julia Lopinto; Joao Roberto Goncalves; Daniela Gamba Garib Carreira; Nivaldo Alonso; Bernardo Quiroga Souki; Raildo da Silva Coqueiro; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency.

Authors:  Hugo J De Clerck; Marie A Cornelis; Lucia H Cevidanes; Gavin C Heymann; Camilla J F Tulloch
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients.

Authors:  Lucia H C Cevidanes; Gavin Heymann; Marie A Cornelis; Hugo J DeClerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.

Authors:  Seung-Hak Baek; Keun-Woo Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  7 in total

1.  Assessment of craniofacial maturation in preadolescents with cleft lip and/or palate using the cervical vertebral maturation method.

Authors:  Laurent A M Thierens; Laura Manalili; Noëmi De Roo; An Verdonck; Maria Cadenas De Llano-Pérula; Guy A M De Pauw
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Three-dimensional treatment planning for maxillary and mandibular segmental surgery for an adult Class III: Where old meets new.

Authors:  R Scott Conley; Sean P Edwards
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Three-dimensional nasal septum and maxillary changes following rapid maxillary expansion in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Natália Costa Veloso; Carolina Morsani Mordente; Adriana Alckmim de Sousa; Juan Martin Palomo; Marilia Yatabe; Dauro Douglas Oliveira; Bernardo Quiroga Souki; Ildeu Andrade
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Zygomaticomaxillary suture maturation: Part II-The influence of sutural maturation on the response to maxillary protraction.

Authors:  F Angelieri; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; L H S Cevidanes; L Franchi; C Toyama-Hino; H J De Clerck; T Nguyen; J A McNamara
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Three-dimensional condylar changes from Herbst appliance and multibracket treatment: A comparison with matched Class II elastics.

Authors:  Robert Y Wei; Arjun Atresh; Antonio Ruellas; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung Nguyen; Brent E Larson; Jonathan E Mangum; David J Manton; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Three-dimensional skeletal mandibular changes associated with Herbst appliance treatment.

Authors:  B Q Souki; P L C Vilefort; D D Oliveira; I Andrade; A C Ruellas; M S Yatabe; T Nguyen; L Franchi; J A McNamara; L H S Cevidanes
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal.

Authors:  Renato Faco; Marilia Yatabe; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Hilde Timmerman; Hugo J De Clerck; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.