A strategy has been devised for increasing the cellular selectivity of membrane-disrupting antibiotics based on the attachment of a facially amphiphilic sterol. Using Amphotericin B (AmB) as a prototype, covalent attachment of cholic acid bound to a series of α,ω-diamines has led to a dramatic reduction in hemolytic activity, a significant reduction in toxicity toward HEK293T cells, and significant retention of antifungal activity.
A strategy has been devised for increasing the cellular selectivity of membrane-disrupting antibiotics based on the attachment of a facially amphiphilic sterol. Using Amphotericin B (AmB) as a prototype, covalent attachment of cholic acid bound to a series of α,ω-diamines has led to a dramatic reduction in hemolytic activity, a significant reduction in toxicity toward HEK293T cells, and significant retention of antifungal activity.
The need to create new antibiotics
to combat drug resistant forms of microbes has now become urgent.[1,2] This need has presented medicinal chemists with a formidable challenge,
i.e., how to rationally design antibiotics that are highly active
in destroying disease-causing microbes without being highly toxic
to mammalian cells.With this challenge in mind, we have focused
our efforts on those
agents that are capable of killing microbes by disrupting their outer
membranes. Our working hypothesis has been that the development of
resistance toward such drugs should be less than for those that must
be internalized to exert their toxic effects. More specifically, we
believe that export mechanisms of resistance and enzymatic degradation
should be less important for drugs that operate within biological
membranes.[3] A classic example of a membrane-disrupting
drug that supports this thinking is the naturally occurring heptaene
macrolide antibiotic, Amphotericin B (AmB).[4−6] Thus, despite
its broad use in treating fungal infections for more than 50 years,
resistance to this antibiotic has proven to be extremely rare. Unfortunately,
AmB remains as one of the most toxic drugs in clinical use.[7,8] One feature that is common to all membrane-disrupting antibiotics
is their reliance on hydrophobic interactions for biological activity.
In the case of AmB, a specific affinity appears to exist toward ergosterol,
i.e., the dominant sterol found in fungal membranes. However, the
basis for this affinity, and the precise mechanism (or mechanisms)
of action of AmB remain as a matter of debate.[4,9,10]Several years ago, we and others reported
that aggregated
forms of AmB have very different biological action as compared with
its monomer.[11,12] Thus, whereas monomers were found
to be highly selective in destroying fungal cells, aggregated forms
were highly toxic to both mammalian and fungal cells. Recently, the
selectivity of certain membrane-disrupting antibacterial agents has
also been found to be dependent on their aggregation state, where
monomers were the more selective species.[13] We believe these sharp differences in biological action between
monomer and aggregates is directly related to the difference that
we found for the action of monomers and aggregates of Triton X-100
on cholesterol-rich liposomes.[14] Specifically,
whereas attack by monomers resulted in membrane leakage, attack by
aggregates led to a catastrophic rupture of the membrane. Taken together,
these findings have led us to posit that the low selectivity of membrane-disrupting
drugs, in general, is a likely consequence of rupturing action by
aggregated forms.Based on this hypothesis, we have been pursuing
two distinct approaches
for increasing the cellular selectivity of membrane-disrupting agents:
(i) raising their critical aggregation concentration (cac) via chemical
modification such that the monomers are favored at therapeutically
relevant concentrations, and (ii) chemically modifying them so that
their aggregates have weaker rupturing power.[12,15] We refer to the latter as “taming”.[15] Here, we report a minimalistic approach for taming a membrane-disrupting
antibiotic that is much simpler than a design principle and modifying
agents (i.e., molecular umbrellas) previously used.[15]A detailed monolayer study of a variety of bile acid/phosphocholine
mixtures has provided compelling evidence that these sterols are oriented
with the long axis of the steroid nucleus lying parallel to the surface
of the monolayer; i.e., the bile acids lie flat at the membrane/water
interface.[16] This finding suggested to
us that such molecules could be used as “floats” that
would help prevent deep penetration of aggregates of membrane-disrupting
agents, thereby reducing their rupturing power (Figure ).
Figure 1
Stylized illustration showing (left) an aggregate
of a membrane-disrupting
agent penetrating deeply into a cholesterol-rich mammalian membrane
and (right) a tamed aggregated agent that is held close to the membrane
surface by a facial amphiphile.
Stylized illustration showing (left) an aggregate
of a membrane-disrupting
agent penetrating deeply into a cholesterol-rich mammalian membrane
and (right) a tamed aggregated agent that is held close to the membrane
surface by a facial amphiphile.To test this concept using a clinically important antifungal
agent,
we synthesized four cholic acid derivatives of AmB, where the length
of the hydrophobic linker was varied, systematically, i.e., 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d (Scheme ). Although we suspected that
the biological properties of such conjugates would be sensitive to
the length of the linker used, exactly how this variable would influence
antifungal activity and membrane selectivity was difficult to predict,
hence the need for testing. Each conjugate was readily prepared by
condensing an activated and protected form of AmB (2)
with the corresponding α,ω-diamine that had been monoacylated
with cholic acid.[15]
Scheme 1
In Figure is shown
a plot the apparent molar absorptivity (λmax 409
nm) of 1a as a function of the reciprocal of its concentration
in PBS at 37 °C. As discussed elsewhere, the intercept of two
straight lines that can be drawn from such a plot affords an estimate
of the conjugate’s critical aggregation concentration (cac).[12] Based on such measurements, the cac values for 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d were
all found to be ca. 1 μM, which is the same as that found for
AmB, itself.[12]
Figure 2
Plot of apparent molar
absorptivity (λmax 409
nm) as a function of the reciprocal concentration of 1a in PBS at 37 °C.
Plot of apparent molar
absorptivity (λmax 409
nm) as a function of the reciprocal concentration of 1a in PBS at 37 °C.An evaluation of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs)
for
AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. neoformans, and C. gatti was then carried out.
Our results are shown in Table . The two conjugates having the shortest chains (1a and 1b) exhibited broad-spectrum antifungal activities
that compared favorably with AmB for all of the fungi tested. Those
conjugates having longer hydrocarbon spacers showed high antifungal
activity against some, but not all, of the fungi tested. Three of
the conjugates (1a, 1b, and 1c) exhibited clinically relevant antifungal and fungicidal activity
(Supporting Information).
Table 1
Antifungal Activity
MIC (μg/mL)a
Microbe
AmB
1a
1b
1c
1d
C. albicans
0.5
1
2
2
>16
C. glabrata
0.5
2
2
>16
>16
C. neoformans
0.3
1
1
1
2
C. gatti
0.3
1
1
1
1
MIC values
are the lowest concentrations
required for completely inhibiting fungal growth.
MIC values
are the lowest concentrations
required for completely inhibiting fungal growth.In Figure are
shown plots of the percent release of hemoglobin from sheep red blood
cells as a function of the concentration of AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d. Whereas AmB was
highly hemolytic (requiring 4 μM of the conjugate for 50% hemolysis,
EH50), the corresponding EH50 value for 1a was more than 2 orders of magnitude higher; i.e., 465 μM.
An even greater reduction in hemolytic activity was found for conjugates 1b, 1c, and 1d, where close to negligible
hemolysis was observed at concentrations as high as 600 μM.
Figure 3
Plot of
percent release of hemoglobin from sheep red blood cells
as a function of concentration of AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d at 37 °C in PBS, pH 7.4.
AmB data taken from ref (15).
Plot of
percent release of hemoglobin from sheep red blood cells
as a function of concentration of AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d at 37 °C in PBS, pH 7.4.
AmB data taken from ref (15).A comparison of the toxicities
of AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d toward HEK293T cells is shown
in Figure . In brief,
AmB exhibited significant toxicity at ca. 1 μg/mL and was highly
toxicity at ≥25 μg/mL. In sharp contrast, both 1c and 1d had negligible toxicities at concentrations
as high as 100 μg/mL. In the case of 1a, cytotoxicity
was apparent at ca. 1 μg/mL, but its toxicity was significantly
lower than AmB at all concentrations tested. At concentrations up
to 25 μg/mL conjugate 1b was even less toxic than 1a. However, at concentrations greater than 25 μg/mL,
the toxicity of 1b approached that of 1a.
Figure 4
Bar graph showing the viability HEK293 T cells in the presence
of varying concentrations of AmB and 1a, 1c, and 1d.
Bar graph showing the viability HEK293 T cells in the presence
of varying concentrations of AmB and 1a, 1c, and 1d.The large separation of hemolytic activity from antifungal
activity
found in 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d clearly demonstrates that the AmB molecule has been tamed
by covalent attachment to the choloyl moiety. The fact that there
is negligible hemolytic activity for 1b, 1c, and 1d at concentrations that are well in excess of
their critical aggregation concentrations further implies that the
rupturing power of their aggregated forms (i.e., their ability to
release the large hemoglobin molecule of ca. 65 kDa) has been greatly
reduced. In the case of 1a, this taming effect is not
as dramatic as with 1b, 1c, and 1d. One possibility for weaker taming action may be that the relatively
short linker causes individual AmB moieties to be misaligned in the
bilayer, resulting in greater rupturing power (Figure ). Finally, it should be noted that the taming
associated with 1a, 1b, 1c,
and 1d with respect to HEK293T cells shows the same trend
as that found with red blood cells; i.e., those conjugates having
the longer hydrocarbon spacers (1c and 1d) show the greatest degree of taming.
Figure 5
Stylized illustration
showing a hypothetical misaligned aggregate
of a membrane disrupting agent held near the surface of a lipid bilayer.
Stylized illustration
showing a hypothetical misaligned aggregate
of a membrane disrupting agent held near the surface of a lipid bilayer.Although the generality of this
taming strategy remains to be established,
the effects seen here with AmB (where toxicity toward mammalian cells
has been dramatically reduced while significant antimicrobial activity
has been retained), together with its simplicity, provides considerable
incentive for exploring its applicability to other classes of membrane-disrupting
antibiotics. Such efforts are currently underway in our laboratories.
Authors: Anna N Tevyashova; Evgenia N Olsufyeva; Svetlana E Solovieva; Svetlana S Printsevskaya; Marina I Reznikova; Aleksei S Trenin; Olga A Galatenko; Ivan D Treshalin; Eleonora R Pereverzeva; Elena P Mirchink; Elena B Isakova; Sergey B Zotchev; Maria N Preobrazhenskaya Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Vaclav Janout; Wiley A Schell; Damien Thévenin; Yuming Yu; John R Perfect; Steven L Regen Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Stephen A Davis; Benjamin M Vincent; Matthew M Endo; Luke Whitesell; Karen Marchillo; David R Andes; Susan Lindquist; Martin D Burke Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Thomas M Anderson; Mary C Clay; Alexander G Cioffi; Katrina A Diaz; Grant S Hisao; Marcus D Tuttle; Andrew J Nieuwkoop; Gemma Comellas; Nashrah Maryum; Shu Wang; Brice E Uno; Erin L Wildeman; Tamir Gonen; Chad M Rienstra; Martin D Burke Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2014-03-30 Impact factor: 15.040