Literature DB >> 27801580

Simple Strategy for Taming Membrane-Disrupting Antibiotics.

Yuming Yu1, Mary J Sabulski1, Wiley A Schell2, Marcos M Pires1, John R Perfect2, Steven L Regen1.   

Abstract

A strategy has been devised for increasing the cellular selectivity of membrane-disrupting antibiotics based on the attachment of a facially amphiphilic sterol. Using Amphotericin B (AmB) as a prototype, covalent attachment of cholic acid bound to a series of α,ω-diamines has led to a dramatic reduction in hemolytic activity, a significant reduction in toxicity toward HEK293T cells, and significant retention of antifungal activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27801580      PMCID: PMC5184371          DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioconjug Chem        ISSN: 1043-1802            Impact factor:   4.774


The need to create new antibiotics to combat drug resistant forms of microbes has now become urgent.[1,2] This need has presented medicinal chemists with a formidable challenge, i.e., how to rationally design antibiotics that are highly active in destroying disease-causing microbes without being highly toxic to mammalian cells. With this challenge in mind, we have focused our efforts on those agents that are capable of killing microbes by disrupting their outer membranes. Our working hypothesis has been that the development of resistance toward such drugs should be less than for those that must be internalized to exert their toxic effects. More specifically, we believe that export mechanisms of resistance and enzymatic degradation should be less important for drugs that operate within biological membranes.[3] A classic example of a membrane-disrupting drug that supports this thinking is the naturally occurring heptaene macrolide antibiotic, Amphotericin B (AmB).[4−6] Thus, despite its broad use in treating fungal infections for more than 50 years, resistance to this antibiotic has proven to be extremely rare. Unfortunately, AmB remains as one of the most toxic drugs in clinical use.[7,8] One feature that is common to all membrane-disrupting antibiotics is their reliance on hydrophobic interactions for biological activity. In the case of AmB, a specific affinity appears to exist toward ergosterol, i.e., the dominant sterol found in fungal membranes. However, the basis for this affinity, and the precise mechanism (or mechanisms) of action of AmB remain as a matter of debate.[4,9,10] Several years ago, we and others reported that aggregated forms of AmB have very different biological action as compared with its monomer.[11,12] Thus, whereas monomers were found to be highly selective in destroying fungal cells, aggregated forms were highly toxic to both mammalian and fungal cells. Recently, the selectivity of certain membrane-disrupting antibacterial agents has also been found to be dependent on their aggregation state, where monomers were the more selective species.[13] We believe these sharp differences in biological action between monomer and aggregates is directly related to the difference that we found for the action of monomers and aggregates of Triton X-100 on cholesterol-rich liposomes.[14] Specifically, whereas attack by monomers resulted in membrane leakage, attack by aggregates led to a catastrophic rupture of the membrane. Taken together, these findings have led us to posit that the low selectivity of membrane-disrupting drugs, in general, is a likely consequence of rupturing action by aggregated forms. Based on this hypothesis, we have been pursuing two distinct approaches for increasing the cellular selectivity of membrane-disrupting agents: (i) raising their critical aggregation concentration (cac) via chemical modification such that the monomers are favored at therapeutically relevant concentrations, and (ii) chemically modifying them so that their aggregates have weaker rupturing power.[12,15] We refer to the latter as “taming”.[15] Here, we report a minimalistic approach for taming a membrane-disrupting antibiotic that is much simpler than a design principle and modifying agents (i.e., molecular umbrellas) previously used.[15] A detailed monolayer study of a variety of bile acid/phosphocholine mixtures has provided compelling evidence that these sterols are oriented with the long axis of the steroid nucleus lying parallel to the surface of the monolayer; i.e., the bile acids lie flat at the membrane/water interface.[16] This finding suggested to us that such molecules could be used as “floats” that would help prevent deep penetration of aggregates of membrane-disrupting agents, thereby reducing their rupturing power (Figure ).
Figure 1

Stylized illustration showing (left) an aggregate of a membrane-disrupting agent penetrating deeply into a cholesterol-rich mammalian membrane and (right) a tamed aggregated agent that is held close to the membrane surface by a facial amphiphile.

Stylized illustration showing (left) an aggregate of a membrane-disrupting agent penetrating deeply into a cholesterol-rich mammalian membrane and (right) a tamed aggregated agent that is held close to the membrane surface by a facial amphiphile. To test this concept using a clinically important antifungal agent, we synthesized four cholic acid derivatives of AmB, where the length of the hydrophobic linker was varied, systematically, i.e., 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d (Scheme ). Although we suspected that the biological properties of such conjugates would be sensitive to the length of the linker used, exactly how this variable would influence antifungal activity and membrane selectivity was difficult to predict, hence the need for testing. Each conjugate was readily prepared by condensing an activated and protected form of AmB (2) with the corresponding α,ω-diamine that had been monoacylated with cholic acid.[15]
Scheme 1
In Figure is shown a plot the apparent molar absorptivity (λmax 409 nm) of 1a as a function of the reciprocal of its concentration in PBS at 37 °C. As discussed elsewhere, the intercept of two straight lines that can be drawn from such a plot affords an estimate of the conjugate’s critical aggregation concentration (cac).[12] Based on such measurements, the cac values for 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d were all found to be ca. 1 μM, which is the same as that found for AmB, itself.[12]
Figure 2

Plot of apparent molar absorptivity (λmax 409 nm) as a function of the reciprocal concentration of 1a in PBS at 37 °C.

Plot of apparent molar absorptivity (λmax 409 nm) as a function of the reciprocal concentration of 1a in PBS at 37 °C. An evaluation of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. neoformans, and C. gatti was then carried out. Our results are shown in Table . The two conjugates having the shortest chains (1a and 1b) exhibited broad-spectrum antifungal activities that compared favorably with AmB for all of the fungi tested. Those conjugates having longer hydrocarbon spacers showed high antifungal activity against some, but not all, of the fungi tested. Three of the conjugates (1a, 1b, and 1c) exhibited clinically relevant antifungal and fungicidal activity (Supporting Information).
Table 1

Antifungal Activity

MIC (μg/mL)a
MicrobeAmB1a1b1c1d
C. albicans0.5122>16
C. glabrata0.522>16>16
C. neoformans0.31112
C. gatti0.31111

MIC values are the lowest concentrations required for completely inhibiting fungal growth.

MIC values are the lowest concentrations required for completely inhibiting fungal growth. In Figure are shown plots of the percent release of hemoglobin from sheep red blood cells as a function of the concentration of AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d. Whereas AmB was highly hemolytic (requiring 4 μM of the conjugate for 50% hemolysis, EH50), the corresponding EH50 value for 1a was more than 2 orders of magnitude higher; i.e., 465 μM. An even greater reduction in hemolytic activity was found for conjugates 1b, 1c, and 1d, where close to negligible hemolysis was observed at concentrations as high as 600 μM.
Figure 3

Plot of percent release of hemoglobin from sheep red blood cells as a function of concentration of AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d at 37 °C in PBS, pH 7.4. AmB data taken from ref (15).

Plot of percent release of hemoglobin from sheep red blood cells as a function of concentration of AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d at 37 °C in PBS, pH 7.4. AmB data taken from ref (15). A comparison of the toxicities of AmB, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d toward HEK293T cells is shown in Figure . In brief, AmB exhibited significant toxicity at ca. 1 μg/mL and was highly toxicity at ≥25 μg/mL. In sharp contrast, both 1c and 1d had negligible toxicities at concentrations as high as 100 μg/mL. In the case of 1a, cytotoxicity was apparent at ca. 1 μg/mL, but its toxicity was significantly lower than AmB at all concentrations tested. At concentrations up to 25 μg/mL conjugate 1b was even less toxic than 1a. However, at concentrations greater than 25 μg/mL, the toxicity of 1b approached that of 1a.
Figure 4

Bar graph showing the viability HEK293 T cells in the presence of varying concentrations of AmB and 1a, 1c, and 1d.

Bar graph showing the viability HEK293 T cells in the presence of varying concentrations of AmB and 1a, 1c, and 1d. The large separation of hemolytic activity from antifungal activity found in 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d clearly demonstrates that the AmB molecule has been tamed by covalent attachment to the choloyl moiety. The fact that there is negligible hemolytic activity for 1b, 1c, and 1d at concentrations that are well in excess of their critical aggregation concentrations further implies that the rupturing power of their aggregated forms (i.e., their ability to release the large hemoglobin molecule of ca. 65 kDa) has been greatly reduced. In the case of 1a, this taming effect is not as dramatic as with 1b, 1c, and 1d. One possibility for weaker taming action may be that the relatively short linker causes individual AmB moieties to be misaligned in the bilayer, resulting in greater rupturing power (Figure ). Finally, it should be noted that the taming associated with 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d with respect to HEK293T cells shows the same trend as that found with red blood cells; i.e., those conjugates having the longer hydrocarbon spacers (1c and 1d) show the greatest degree of taming.
Figure 5

Stylized illustration showing a hypothetical misaligned aggregate of a membrane disrupting agent held near the surface of a lipid bilayer.

Stylized illustration showing a hypothetical misaligned aggregate of a membrane disrupting agent held near the surface of a lipid bilayer. Although the generality of this taming strategy remains to be established, the effects seen here with AmB (where toxicity toward mammalian cells has been dramatically reduced while significant antimicrobial activity has been retained), together with its simplicity, provides considerable incentive for exploring its applicability to other classes of membrane-disrupting antibiotics. Such efforts are currently underway in our laboratories.
  13 in total

Review 1.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of amphotericin B derivatives.

Authors:  Astrid A Volmer; Alex M Szpilman; Erick M Carreira
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 13.423

2.  Helping Chemists Discover New Antibiotics.

Authors:  Mark A T Blaskovich; Johannes Zuegg; Alysha G Elliott; Matthew A Cooper
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 5.084

3.  Comparison of nephrotoxicity associated to different lipid formulations of amphotericin B: a real-life study.

Authors:  Diego R Falci; Franciane B da Rosa; Alessandro C Pasqualotto
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.377

4.  Structure-antifungal activity relationships of polyene antibiotics of the amphotericin B group.

Authors:  Anna N Tevyashova; Evgenia N Olsufyeva; Svetlana E Solovieva; Svetlana S Printsevskaya; Marina I Reznikova; Aleksei S Trenin; Olga A Galatenko; Ivan D Treshalin; Eleonora R Pereverzeva; Elena P Mirchink; Elena B Isakova; Sergey B Zotchev; Maria N Preobrazhenskaya
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Effects of aggregation and solvent on the toxicity of amphotericin B to human erythrocytes.

Authors:  P Legrand; E A Romero; B E Cohen; J Bolard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Bile acid/phosphatidylcholine interactions in mixed monomolecular layers: differences in condensation effects but not interfacial orientation between hydrophobic and hydrophilic bile acid species.

Authors:  D A Fahey; M C Carey; J M Donovan
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-08-29       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Taming Amphotericin B.

Authors:  Vaclav Janout; Wiley A Schell; Damien Thévenin; Yuming Yu; John R Perfect; Steven L Regen
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.774

8.  Nontoxic antimicrobials that evade drug resistance.

Authors:  Stephen A Davis; Benjamin M Vincent; Matthew M Endo; Luke Whitesell; Karen Marchillo; David R Andes; Susan Lindquist; Martin D Burke
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 15.040

9.  Amphotericin forms an extramembranous and fungicidal sterol sponge.

Authors:  Thomas M Anderson; Mary C Clay; Alexander G Cioffi; Katrina A Diaz; Grant S Hisao; Marcus D Tuttle; Andrew J Nieuwkoop; Gemma Comellas; Nashrah Maryum; Shu Wang; Brice E Uno; Erin L Wildeman; Tamir Gonen; Chad M Rienstra; Martin D Burke
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 10.  Recent progress in the study of the interactions of amphotericin B with cholesterol and ergosterol in lipid environments.

Authors:  Daniel Michał Kamiński
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 1.733

View more
  2 in total

1.  Amphotericin B Tamed by Salicylic Acid.

Authors:  Yuming Yu; Peng Chen; Ming Gao; Wei Lan; Shijun Sun; Ziwei Ma; Rome Sultani; Yincang Cui; Muhammad Naveed Umar; Sher Wali Khan; Xiaodong Cai; Zhenjiang Liang; Hui Tan
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-04-19

2.  Channel Formation and Membrane Deformation via Sterol-Aided Polymorphism of Amphidinol 3.

Authors:  Masayuki Iwamoto; Ayumi Sumino; Eri Shimada; Masanao Kinoshita; Nobuaki Matsumori; Shigetoshi Oiki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.