Literature DB >> 27800568

Flexible goal imitation: Vicarious feedback influences stimulus-response binding by observation.

Carina Giesen1, Kerstin Scherdin2, Klaus Rothermund2.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether vicarious feedback influences binding processes between stimuli and observed responses. Two participants worked together in a shared color categorization task, taking the roles of actor and observer in turns. During a prime trial, participants saw a word while observing the other person executing a specific response. Automatic binding of words and observed responses into stimulus-response (S-R) episodes was assessed via word repetition effects in a subsequent probe trial in which either the same (compatible) or a different (incompatible) response had to be executed by the participants in response to the same or a different word. Results showed that vicarious prime feedback (i.e., the feedback that the other participant received for her or his response in the prime) modulated S-R retrieval effects: After positive vicarious prime feedback, typical S-R retrieval effects emerged (i.e., performance benefits for stimulus repetition probes with compatible responses, but performance costs for stimulus repetition probes with incompatible responses emerged). Notably, however, S-R-retrieval effects were reversed after vicarious negative prime feedback (meaning that stimulus repetition in the probe resulted in performance costs if prime and probe responses were compatible, and in performance benefits for incompatible responses). Findings are consistent with a flexible goal imitation account, according to which imitation is based on an interpretative and therefore feedback-sensitive reconstruction of action goals from observed movements. In concert with earlier findings, this data support the conclusion that transient S-R binding and retrieval processes are involved in social learning phenomena.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episodic retrieval; Event files; Observational learning; Stimulus-response binding; Vicarious feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27800568     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-016-0250-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  16 in total

1.  INFLUENCE OF MODEL'S REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCIES ON THE ACQUISITION OF IMITATIVE RESPONSES.

Authors:  A BANDURA
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1965-06

2.  Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming.

Authors:  Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Feature binding and affect: emotional modulation of visuo-motor integration.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Nelleke C van Wouwe; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Motivation and attention: Incongruent effects of feedback on the processing of valence.

Authors:  Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2003-09

5.  Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Copying competitors? Interdependency modulates stimulus-based retrieval of observed responses.

Authors:  Carina Giesen; Johanna Herrmann; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Multi-level response coding in stimulus-response bindings: Irrelevant distractors retrieve both semantic and motor response codes.

Authors:  Carina Giesen; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The role of group membership on the modulation of joint action.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Filomena Anelli; Roberto Nicoletti; Luciano Arcuri; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Episodic S-R bindings and emotion: about the influence of positive and negative action effects on stimulus-response associations.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Vanida Pholulamdeth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Stimulus-response bindings in priming.

Authors:  Richard N Henson; Doris Eckstein; Florian Waszak; Christian Frings; Aidan J Horner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  5 in total

1.  Intimacy Effects on Action Regulation: Retrieval of Observationally Acquired Stimulus-Response Bindings in Romantically Involved Interaction Partners Versus Strangers.

Authors:  Carina Giesen; Virginia Löhl; Klaus Rothermund; Nicolas Koranyi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-03

2.  Assessing the Durability of One-Shot Stimulus-Control Bindings.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Christina U Pfeuffer; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-04-07

3.  Frankly, My Error, I Don't Give a Damn: Retrieval of Goal-Based but Not Coactivation-Based Bindings after Erroneous Responses.

Authors:  Juhi Parmar; Anna Foerster; Roland Pfister; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-06-06

4.  Reluctance against the machine: Retrieval of observational stimulus-response episodes in online settings emerges when interacting with a human, but not with a computer partner.

Authors:  Carina G Giesen; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-01-21

5.  Smaller Than Expected.

Authors:  Carina G Giesen; Laura Nagel; Matthäus Rudolph; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2021-08-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.