Literature DB >> 26913936

Multi-level response coding in stimulus-response bindings: Irrelevant distractors retrieve both semantic and motor response codes.

Carina Giesen1, Klaus Rothermund1.   

Abstract

Stimulus-response (S-R) episodes are formed whenever a response is executed in close temporal proximity to a stimulus. Subsequent stimulus repetition will retrieve the episode from memory, reactivating the previous response. Whereas many research findings attest to the flexibility of representing stimulus features, only little is known about the way responses are coded within transient S-R episodes, that is, whether the retrieved response is represented in terms of specific motor codes, abstract/semantic codes, or both. To differentiate between these accounts, we used an approach/avoidance task in which semantic meanings (i.e., moving a word "towards" or "away from" a manikin on screen) and motor codes of responses (i.e., pulling or pushing a joystick) were manipulated orthogonally. Results of 2 experiments indicated that stimulus repetitions retrieve both, semantic as well as motor code representations, indicating multiple and independent levels of response coding. We conclude that response representation in S-R episodes follows similar binding principles as are known from stimulus integration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26913936     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  6 in total

1.  Flexible goal imitation: Vicarious feedback influences stimulus-response binding by observation.

Authors:  Carina Giesen; Kerstin Scherdin; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition.

Authors:  Carina G Giesen; James R Schmidt; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-15

3.  Perception and action as viewed from the Theory of Event Coding: a multi-lab replication and effect size estimation of common experimental designs.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Carina G Giesen; Birte Moeller; David Dignath; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-08-17

4.  Feature-specific retrieval of the knowledge of having lied before: Persons and questions independently retrieve truth-related information.

Authors:  Franziska Schreckenbach; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.138

5.  Study-test congruence of response levels in item stimulus-response priming.

Authors:  Carlos A Gomes; Andrew Mayes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-07

6.  Task relevance determines binding of effect features in action planning.

Authors:  Viola Mocke; Lisa Weller; Christian Frings; Klaus Rothermund; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.