Literature DB >> 27798723

Impact of the Level of Anastomosis on Reflux Esophagitis Following Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction.

Makoto Sakai1, Makoto Sohda2, Tatsuya Miyazaki2, Tomonori Yoshida2, Yuji Kumakura2, Hiroaki Honjo2, Keigo Hara2, Takehiko Yokobori3, Hiroyuki Kuwano2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among patients who undergo gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy, it is generally accepted that the incidence of reflux esophagitis (RE) is significantly lower in patients with neck anastomosis than in those with intrathoracic anastomosis. However, the true impact of the level of anastomosis on RE currently remains unclear.
METHODS: We examined 53 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and neck anastomosis. The level of anastomosis was assessed by measuring the distance from the sternal notch to the stapled ring by computed tomography. The relative level of anastomosis was calculated by the distance from the sternal notch to the most caudal side of the stapled ring (mm)/height (cm).
RESULTS: The relative level of anastomosis in 30 (56.6%) patients showed <0, which indicated that anastomosis in these patients was located at a lower level than the sternal notch. The mean relative level of anastomosis was significantly lower in patients with RE (grade A to D) than in those without RE (grade N) (-0.062 vs. -0.012 mm/cm, respectively; p = 0.043). RE was more severe with a lower relative level of anastomosis (p for trends = 0.044).
CONCLUSIONS: The level of anastomosis in patients with gastric tube reconstruction following esophagectomy was associated with the incidence of RE. The displacement of anastomosis into the thoracic cavity was detected in approximately half of the patients with neck anastomosis. RE was more severe with a lower level of anastomosis, even in patients with neck anastomosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27798723     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3786-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

1.  The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement.

Authors:  D Armstrong; J R Bennett; A L Blum; J Dent; F T De Dombal; J P Galmiche; L Lundell; M Margulies; J E Richter; S J Spechler; G N Tytgat; L Wallin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Functional evaluation of the intrathoracic stomach as an oesophageal substitute.

Authors:  L Bonavina; M Anselmino; A Ruol; R Bardini; N Borsato; A Peracchia
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute recovers intraluminal acidity with time.

Authors:  C Gutschow; J M Collard; R Romagnoli; M Salizzoni; A Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A physical model of the intrathoracic stomach.

Authors:  W A Bemelman; J Verburg; W H Brummelkamp; P J Klopper
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1988-02

5.  Acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

Authors:  Norihiro Yuasa; Eiji Sasaki; Takashi Ikeyama; Hideo Miyake; Yuji Nimura
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Reflux esophagitis after esophagectomy: impact of duodenogastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  K Nishimura; T Tanaka; T Tsubuku; S Matono; T Nagano; K Murata; Y Aoyama; T Yanagawa; K Shirouzu; H Fujita
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.429

7.  High incidence of reflux esophagitis observed by routine endoscopic examination after gastric pull-up esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shunsuke Shibuya; Shin Fukudo; Ryuzaburo Shineha; Shukichi Miyazaki; Go Miyata; Koh Sugawara; Takahiro Mori; Shuichi Tanabe; Norio Tonotsuka; Susumu Satomi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Helicobacter pylori infection influences the acidity in the gastric tube as an esophageal substitute after esophagectomy.

Authors:  N Mori; H Fujita; S Sueyoshi; Y Aoyama; T Yanagawa; K Shirouzu
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.429

9.  Clinical analysis of reflux esophagitis following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

Authors:  Soichiro Yamamoto; Hiroyasu Makuuchi; Hideo Shimada; Osamu Chino; Takayuki Nishi; Yoshifumi Kise; Takahiro Kenmochi; Tadashi Hara
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Quality of life measurements as an indicator for timing of support after oesophagectomy for cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marlene Malmström; Rosemarie Klefsgard; Bodil Ivarsson; Maria Roman; Jan Johansson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  Two-step method for creating a gastric tube during laparoscopic-thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Ji-Jia Li; Peng Zu; Hong-Xu Liu; Zhan-Wu Yu; Yi Ren
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Functional syndromes and symptom-orientated aftercare after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kristjan Ukegjini; Diana Vetter; Rebecca Fehr; Valerian Dirr; Christoph Gubler; Christian A Gutschow
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.445

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.