Literature DB >> 11303132

Denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute recovers intraluminal acidity with time.

C Gutschow1, J M Collard, R Romagnoli, M Salizzoni, A Hölscher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute recovers normal intraluminal acidity with time. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Bilateral truncal vagotomy to the stomach as an esophageal substitute reduces both gastric acid production and antral motility, but a spontaneous motor recovery process takes place over years.
METHODS: Intraluminal gastric pH and bile were monitored during a 24-hour period 1 to 195 months after transthoracic elevation of the stomach as esophageal replacement in 91 and 76 patients, respectively. Nine patients underwent a second gastric pH monitoring after a 3-year period. The percentages of time that the gastric pH was less than 2 and bile absorbance exceeded 0.25 were calculated in reference to values from 25 healthy volunteers. Eighty-nine upper gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed in 83 patients. Patients were divided into three groups depending on length of follow-up: group 1, less than 1 year; group 2, 1 to 3 years; group 3, more than 3 years.
RESULTS: The prevalence of a normal gastric pH profile was 32.3% in group 1, 81.5% in group 2, and 97.6% in group 3. The percentage of time that the gastric pH was less than 2 increased from group 1 (27.3%) to group 2 (56.1%) and group 3 (70.5%), parallel to an increase in the prevalence of cervical heartburn and esophagitis. The percentage of time that the gastric pH was less than 2 increased from 28.7% to 81.2% in the nine patients investigated twice. Exposure of the gastric mucosa to bile was 12.8% in patients with a high gastric pH profile versus 19.3% in those with normal acidity. In the esophageal remnant in six patients, Barrett's metaplasia developed, intestinal (n = 2) or gastric (n = 4) in type.
CONCLUSIONS: Early after vagotomy, intraluminal gastric acidity is reduced in two thirds of patients, but the stomach recovers a normal intraluminal pH profile with time, so that in more than one third of patients, disabling cervical heartburn and esophagitis develop. The potential for the development of Barrett's metaplasia in the esophageal remnant brings into question the use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute in benign and early neoplastic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11303132      PMCID: PMC1421279          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200104000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  31 in total

1.  [Barrett esophagus in the esophageal stump after subtotal esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastroplasty].

Authors:  J R da Rocha; I Cecconello; B Zilberstein; R A Sallum; P Sakai; S Ishioka; H W Pinotti
Journal:  Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr

2.  Electrophysiological identification of vagally innervated enteric neurons in guinea pig stomach.

Authors:  M Schemann; D Grundy
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-11

3.  Surgical anatomy of the arterial supply to the colon from the superior mesenteric artery based upon a study of 600 specimens.

Authors:  J SONNELAND; B J ANSON; L E BEATON
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1958-04

4.  Functional evaluation of the intrathoracic stomach as an oesophageal substitute.

Authors:  L Bonavina; M Anselmino; A Ruol; R Bardini; N Borsato; A Peracchia
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Simultaneous labeling of vagal innervation of the gut and afferent projections from the visceral forebrain with dil injected into the dorsal vagal complex in the rat.

Authors:  H R Berthoud; A Jedrzejewska; T L Powley
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1990-11-01       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  The effect of posture on the emptying of the intrathoracic vagotomized stomach.

Authors:  R A Hinder
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Function of the intrathoracic stomach as esophageal replacement.

Authors:  A H Hölscher; H Voit; G Buttermann; J R Siewert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  [20 years of vagotomy: indications and choice of procedure--duodenal ulcer].

Authors:  J R Siewert; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 0.942

9.  Role of pyloroplasty in the retrosternal stomach: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  A Mannell; A McKnight; J D Esser
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  The denervated stomach as an esophageal substitute is a contractile organ.

Authors:  J M Collard; R Romagnoli; J B Otte; P J Kestens
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  25 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Christian A Gutschow; Arnulf H Hölscher; Jessica Leers; Hans Fuchs; Marc Bludau; Klaus L Prenzel; E Bollschweiler; Wolfgang Schröder
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction.

Authors:  Iraklis E Katsoulis; Ioannis Robotis; Grigorios Kouraklis; Panagiotis Yannopoulos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Risk factors of reflux esophagitis in the cervical remnant following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.

Authors:  Kazuhito Yajima; Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Tatsuo Kanda; Atsushi Matsuki; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Esophagotracheal fistula caused by gastroesophageal reflux 9 years after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kiyotomi Maruyama; Satoru Motoyama; Manabu Okuyama; Yusuke Sato; Kaori Hayashi; Yoshihiro Minamiya; Jun-ichi Ogawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Late presentation of gastric tube ulcer perforation after oesophageal atresia repair.

Authors:  Eric J Hazebroek; Frans W J Hazebroek; Steven Leibman; Garett S Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  The Impact of the Location of Esophagogastrostomy on Acid and Duodenogastroesophageal Reflux After Transthoracic Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction and Intrathoracic Esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Hiroaki Usui; Masahide Fukaya; Keita Itatsu; Kazushi Miyata; Ryoji Miyahara; Kohei Funasaka; Masato Nagino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Metaplastic columnar mucosa in the cervical esophagus after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Stefan Oberg; Jan Johansson; Jörgen Wenner; Bruno Walther
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Methods of reconstruction after esophagectomy on long-term health-related quality of life: a prospective, randomized study of 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Qiang Li; Hong-Tao Tie; Ying-Jiu Jiang; Qing-Chen Wu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy.

Authors:  Sadik Yildirim; Hakan Köksal; Fevzi Celayir; Levent Erdem; Muharrem Oner; Adil Baykan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Ivor-Lewis oesophagogastrectomy with Roux-en-Y duodenal bypass.

Authors:  J Cartwright; E Forbat; A Botha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.