David T Levy1, Darren Mays1, Raymond G Boyle2, Jamie Tam3, Frank J Chaloupka4. 1. Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. 2. Research Programs Department, ClearWay Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 3. Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 4. Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use has shifted increasingly from cigarettes to other products. While the focus has been mostly on cigarette-oriented policies, it is important to gauge the effects of policies targeting other products. We review and critique the literature on how policies affect smokeless tobacco (ST). METHODS: We conducted a search of the literature on tobacco control policies as they relate to ST use, focusing on tobacco taxes, smoke-free air laws, media campaigns, advertising restrictions, health warnings, cessation treatment policies, and youth access policies. Findings from 78 total studies are summarized. RESULTS: ST taxes, media campaigns, health warnings, and cessation treatment policies were found to be effective tools in reducing ST use. Evidence on the effects of current youth access policies is less strong. Studies have not yet been conducted on marketing or product content restrictions, but the literature indicates that product marketing, through advertising, packaging, flavorings, and extension of cigarette brands, plays an important role in ST use. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence base is less established for ST policies than for cigarette policies, the existing literature indicates ST use responds to tobacco control policies. Policies should be structured in a way that aims to reduce all tobacco use while at the same time increasing the likelihood that continuing tobacco users use the least risky products. IMPLICATIONS: Studies find that policies targeting smoking and policies targeting smokeless products affect smokeless use, but studies are needed to examine the effect of policies on the transitions between cigarette and smokeless use.
INTRODUCTION: Tobacco use has shifted increasingly from cigarettes to other products. While the focus has been mostly on cigarette-oriented policies, it is important to gauge the effects of policies targeting other products. We review and critique the literature on how policies affect smokeless tobacco (ST). METHODS: We conducted a search of the literature on tobacco control policies as they relate to ST use, focusing on tobacco taxes, smoke-free air laws, media campaigns, advertising restrictions, health warnings, cessation treatment policies, and youth access policies. Findings from 78 total studies are summarized. RESULTS: ST taxes, media campaigns, health warnings, and cessation treatment policies were found to be effective tools in reducing ST use. Evidence on the effects of current youth access policies is less strong. Studies have not yet been conducted on marketing or product content restrictions, but the literature indicates that product marketing, through advertising, packaging, flavorings, and extension of cigarette brands, plays an important role in ST use. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence base is less established for ST policies than for cigarette policies, the existing literature indicates ST use responds to tobacco control policies. Policies should be structured in a way that aims to reduce all tobacco use while at the same time increasing the likelihood that continuing tobacco users use the least risky products. IMPLICATIONS: Studies find that policies targeting smoking and policies targeting smokeless products affect smokeless use, but studies are needed to examine the effect of policies on the transitions between cigarette and smokeless use.
Authors: Linda Truitt; William L Hamilton; P R Johnston; C P Bacani; S O Crawford; L Hozik; Carolyn Celebucki Journal: Tob Control Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Israel T Agaku; Constantine I Vardavas; Olalekan A Ayo-Yusuf; Hillel R Alpert; Gregory N Connolly Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jon O Ebbert; Herbert H Severson; Ivana T Croghan; Brian G Danaher; Darrell R Schroeder Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Sherry T Liu; Julianna M Nemeth; Elizabeth G Klein; Amy K Ferketich; Mei-Po Kwan; Mary Ellen Wewers Journal: Tob Control Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Christine M Kava; Jeffrey R Harris; Kwun C Gary Chan; Marlana J Kohn; Amanda T Parrish; Peggy A Hannon Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: David T Levy; Alex C Liber; Christopher Cadham; Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero; Andrew Hyland; Michael Cummings; Cliff Douglas; Rafael Meza; Lisa Henriksen Journal: Tob Control Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: Yingning Wang; Hai-Yen Sung; James Lightwood; Benjamin W Chaffee; Tingting Yao; Wendy Max Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 4.244