Literature DB >> 27796763

A Two-Stage Approach to Differentiating Normal and Aberrant Behavior in Computer Based Testing.

Chun Wang1, Gongjun Xu2, Zhuoran Shang2.   

Abstract

Statistical methods for identifying aberrances on psychological and educational tests are pivotal to detect flaws in the design of a test or irregular behavior of test takers. Two approaches have been taken in the past to address the challenge of aberrant behavior detection, which are (1) modeling aberrant behavior via mixture modeling methods, and (2) flagging aberrant behavior via residual based outlier detection methods. In this paper, we propose a two-stage method that is conceived of as a combination of both approaches. In the first stage, a mixture hierarchical model is fitted to the response and response time data to distinguish normal and aberrant behaviors using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. In the second stage, a further distinction between rapid guessing and cheating behavior is made at a person level using a Bayesian residual index. Simulation results show that the two-stage method yields accurate item and person parameter estimates, as well as high true detection rate and low false detection rate, under different manipulated conditions mimicking NAEP parameters. A real data example is given in the end to illustrate the potential application of the proposed method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian residual index; MCMC; hierarchical mixture model; response times

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27796763     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9525-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  6 in total

1.  The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times.

Authors:  Chun Wang; Hua-Hua Chang; Jeffrey A Douglas
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Detection of Test Speededness Using Change-Point Analysis.

Authors:  Can Shao; Jun Li; Ying Cheng
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  A speeded item response model: leave the harder till later.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Chang; Rung-Ching Tsai; Nan-Jung Hsu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  A mixture hierarchical model for response times and response accuracy.

Authors:  Chun Wang; Gongjun Xu
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Using Deterministic, Gated Item Response Theory Model to detect test cheating due to item compromise.

Authors:  Zhan Shu; Robert Henson; Richard Luecht
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Bayesian Checks on Cheating on Tests.

Authors:  Wim J van der Linden; Charles Lewis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.500

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Identifying Effortful Individuals With Mixture Modeling Response Accuracy and Response Time Simultaneously to Improve Item Parameter Estimation.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Ying Cheng; Hongyun Liu
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Methods of Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding: Comparisons and Practical Recommendations.

Authors:  Maxwell Hong; Jeffrey T Steedle; Ying Cheng
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.821

3.  Response Mixture Modeling: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Item Characteristics across Response Times.

Authors:  Dylan Molenaar; Paul de Boeck
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Application of Change Point Analysis of Response Time Data to Detect Test Speededness.

Authors:  Ying Cheng; Can Shao
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.088

5.  Two New Models for Item Preknowledge.

Authors:  Kylie Gorney; James A Wollack
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2022-06-22

6.  Modeling Conditional Dependence of Response Accuracy and Response Time with the Diffusion Item Response Theory Model.

Authors:  Inhan Kang; Paul De Boeck; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Bayesian Analysis of Aberrant Response and Response Time Data.

Authors:  Zhaoyuan Zhang; Jiwei Zhang; Jing Lu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-25

8.  Parameter Estimation Accuracy of the Effort-Moderated Item Response Theory Model Under Multiple Assumption Violations.

Authors:  Joseph A Rios; James Soland
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.088

9.  Modeling Response Time and Responses in Multidimensional Health Measurement.

Authors:  Chun Wang; David J Weiss; Shiyang Su
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-29

10.  Exploring the Correlation Between Multiple Latent Variables and Covariates in Hierarchical Data Based on the Multilevel Multidimensional IRT Model.

Authors:  Jiwei Zhang; Jing Lu; Feng Chen; Jian Tao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.