Literature DB >> 27794405

Robot-assisted surgery for lung cancer: State of the art and perspectives.

Giulia Veronesi1, Pierluigi Novellis2, Emanuele Voulaz1, Marco Alloisio1.   

Abstract

The robotic surgical system is the result of a long process of development aimed at producing a natural extension of the surgeon's eyes and hands via the intermediation of a computer. In this way, the ease of movement obtained with open surgery is summated with the advantages of the minimally invasive technique. Since 2000, when the first robotic system for surgery was introduced, robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has been adopted by an increasing number of centres around the world, and today is used in ∼10% of lobectomies in the US. Here, we review the characteristics and function of the robotic system available today (namely, Intuitive Surgical Inc.'s da Vinci Surgical System), outline the different techniques for major lung resection via RATS, compare RATS with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy, and speculate on future developments. To date, no randomized trials have reported comparative data on RATS vs. VATS/thoracotomy for lung cancer. Retrospective analysis comparing RATS vs. thoracotomy have revealed advantages for the former, especially shorter hospital stays and a lower complication rate, but RATS produces similar or only slightly better results to VATS, the two being minimally invasive techniques with no need for rib separation. A few studies have reported RATS to be safer than VATS, with less conversions for bleeding, less complications; in others, it was associated with lower postoperative consumption of pain killers and quicker return of patients to normal activity. In addition, lymphnode upstaging has been shown to be higher with RATS than with VATS, with a similar rate as thoracotomy. The main disadvantage of RATS is the higher costs of instrumentation. Nevertheless, the future will probably see reductions in the costs and improvements in the instrumentation, integration with 3D imaging to improve virtual reality, and more patients benefitting from minimally invasive procedures for lung malignancies.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robot-assisted thoracic surgery; Surgical robot; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery RATS vs. VATS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27794405     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  32 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted right medial and anterior basal segmentectomy (S7+S8).

Authors:  Jian-Tao Li; Jia Huang; Qing-Quan Luo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Four arms robotic-assisted pulmonary resection-left lower lobectomy: how to do it.

Authors:  Alessandro Pardolesi; Luca Bertolaccini; Jury Brandolini; Piergiorgio Solli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  The lobar vs. sublobar "limited" resection respiratory function preservation debate: learning to speak the same language.

Authors:  Vasileios Kouritas; Richard Milton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-04

4.  Postoperative pain after lobectomy: robot-assisted, video-assisted and open thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Augustinus P T van der Ploeg; Ninos Ayez; George P Akkersdijk; Charles C van Rossem; Peter D de Rooij
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-29

5.  Four arms robotic-assisted pulmonary resection-right lower/middle lobectomy: how to do it.

Authors:  Alessandro Pardolesi; Luca Bertolaccini; Jury Brandolini; Filippo Tommaso Gallina; Pierluigi Novellis; Giulia Veronesi; Piergiorgio Solli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  From manual to robotic video-assisted resection of posterior mediastinal masses.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi; Michela Solinas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Different techniques in robotic lung resection.

Authors:  Pierluigi Novellis; Marco Alloisio; Umberto Cariboni; Giulia Veronesi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Utilization Trends, Outcomes, and Cost in Minimally Invasive Lobectomy.

Authors:  Melanie P Subramanian; Jingxia Liu; William C Chapman; Margaret A Olsen; Yan Yan; Ying Liu; Tara R Semenkovich; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri; Benjamin D Kozower
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Perioperative outcomes of radical lobectomies using robotic-assisted thoracoscopic technique vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic technique: retrospective study of 1,075 consecutive p-stage I non-small cell lung cancer cases.

Authors:  Jian-Tao Li; Pei-Yao Liu; Jia Huang; Pei-Ji Lu; Hao Lin; Qian-Jun Zhou; Qing-Quan Luo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy or segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianglei Ma; Xiaoyao Li; Shifu Zhao; Jiawei Wang; Wujia Zhang; Guangyuan Sun
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.