| Literature DB >> 27793201 |
Maaike Koning1, Trynke Hoekstra2,3, Elske de Jong4,5, Tommy L S Visscher4, Jacob C Seidell4,2, Carry M Renders4,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To date, many epidemiologic studies examining associations between obesity and dietary and sedentary/physical activity behaviors have focused on assessing Body Mass Index (BMI) at one point in time. Recent developments in statistical techniques make it possible to study the potential heterogeneity in the development of BMI during childhood by identifying distinct subpopulations characterized by distinct developmental trajectories. Using Latent Class Growth (Mixture) Modelling (LCGMM) techniques we aimed to identify BMI trajectories in childhood and to examine associations between these distinct trajectories and dietary, sedentary and physical activity behaviors.Entities:
Keywords: Body mass index; Childhood overweight; Developmental trajectory; Health related behaviors; Latent class growth (mixture) models; Longitudinal study
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27793201 PMCID: PMC5086035 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3757-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Model fit indices of LCGMM
| Number of classes | Bayesian Information Criterion | Bootstrapped likelihood ratio test (BLRT) | Average posterior probability (min-max) | Number of subjects per class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3631.500 | - | 1.00 | 613 |
| 2 | 3607.081 |
| 0.827 (0.784-0.869) | 416/197 |
| 3 | 3608.926 |
| 0.739 (0.678-0.825) | 212/346/55 |
| 4 | 3618.315 |
| 0.823 (0.709-0.918) | 204/23/4/382 |
| 5 | 3626.946 |
| 0.771 (0.709-0.826) | 353/23/25/200/12 |
Fig. 1Two class linear model of BMI SDS trajectories. The latent growth patterns of BMI SDS are represented by mean trajectories of BMI standard deviation scores (SDS) (y-axis) at the different mean ages (x-axis)
Characteristics of the study population
| Variables of interest [%] or [mean (SD)] | BMI trajectories |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increasing ( | Decreasing ( | Total sample ( | ||
| Gender % male | 54.8 | 48.1 | 50.2 | |
| SES | ||||
| low | 18.2 | 9.3 | 12.1 | ** |
| middle | 26.6 | 20.3 | 22.3 | ** |
| high | 55.2 | 70.4 | 65.6 | ** |
| Ethnicity – % non-western | 14.4 | 5.8 | 8.5 | ** |
| BMI | ||||
| 2006 | 15.8 (1.5) | 15.5 (1.2) | 5.6 (1.3) | |
| 2009 | 17.1 (2.4) | 15.4 (1.6) | 16.0 (2.0) | ** |
| 2012 | 19.8 (2.6) | 16.6 (1.6) | 17.6 (2.5) | ** |
| Waist circumference | ||||
| 2006 | 53.6 (4.2) | 53.3 (5.8) | 53.4 (5.4) | |
| 2009 | 61.6 (7.0) | 57.3 (4.0) | 58.7 (5.5) | ** |
| 2012 | 71.8 (8.1) | 62.8 (5.1) | 65.7 (7.5) | ** |
| Weight status child (%) | ||||
| Thinness | ||||
| 2006 | 9.6 | 10.8 | 10.4 | * |
| 2009 | 5.0 | 17.9 | 13.8 | ** |
| 2012 | 0.0 | 15.6 | 10.6 | ** |
| Healthy weight | ||||
| 2006 | 81.1 | 82.7 | 82.4 | * |
| 2009 | 77.3 | 77.3 | 77.3 | ** |
| 2012 | 73.1 | 82.1 | 79.6 | ** |
| Overweight (including obesity) | ||||
| 2006 | 8.7 | 6.5 | 7.2 | * |
| 2009 | 17.6 | 4.8 | 8.9 | ** |
| 2012 | 26.9 | 1.7 | 9.8 | ** |
| Weight status parent | ||||
| BMI mother (% overweight) | ||||
| 2006 | 46.0 | 20.7 | 29.6 | ** |
| 2012 | 40.7 | 25.3 | 30.2 | ** |
| BMI father (% overweight) | ||||
| 2006 | 51.4 | 46.6 | 48.1 | |
| 2012 | 58.2 | 45.3 | 49.4 | * |
Abbreviations: BMI body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared), SDS standard deviation scores, SES socioeconomic status, SD standard deviation
a P-values determined using X 2 test (categorical variables or T-test (continuous variables): * p < 0.05 for difference between trajectories; **p < 0.001 for difference between trajectories
Health related behaviors in the BMI SDS trajectories
| Variables of interest [%] | BMI trajectories |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increasing ( | Decreasing ( | Total sample ( | ||
| Dietary behaviors | ||||
| Vegetable intake < 5 days a week | ||||
| 2006 | 60.8 | 55.5 | 57.1 | |
| 2012 | 52.8 | 59.8 | 57.4 | |
| Fruit < 2 portions a day | ||||
| 2006 | 72.5 | 72.9 ***b | 72.8 *** | |
| 2012 | 76.0 | 82.2 *** | 80.4 *** | |
| Sugared drinks > 3 glasses a day | ||||
| 2006 | 54.0 *** | 46.0 *** | 48.6 *** | |
| 2012 | 40.2 *** | 33.8 *** | 35.9 *** | |
| Physical activity behaviors | ||||
| Outside play < 1 h a day | ||||
| 2006 | 53.6 (4.2) | 53.3 (5.8) | 53.4 (5.4) | |
| 2012 | 71.8 (8.1) | 62.8 (5.1) | 65.7 (7.5) | |
| Organized sports < 1 h a week | ||||
| 2006 | 69.1 *** | 66.5 *** | 67.3 *** | |
| 2012 | 20.9 *** | 14.7 *** | 16.7 *** | * |
| Sedentary behaviors | ||||
| TV viewing > 2 h a day | ||||
| 2006 | 4.1 *** | 2.8 *** | 3.2 *** | |
| 2012 | 14.9 *** | 9.9 *** | 11.5 *** | |
| Screentime > 2 h a day | ||||
| 2006 | 6.2 *** | 5.6 *** | 5.8 *** | |
| 2012 | 65.0 *** | 57.2 *** | 59.7 *** | |
Abbreviations: BMI body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared), SDS standard deviation scores
a P-values determined using X 2 test : *p < 0.05 for difference between trajectories
b P-values determined using X 2 test: ***p <0.001 for differences in health related behaviors between baseline and follow-up
Logistic regressions showing associations between class membership and behaviors at baseline (2006) and at follow-up (2012)
| Crude analyses, unadjusted | Adjusted for gender, SES and ethnicity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 OR (95 %-CI) | 2012 OR (95 %-CI) | 2006 OR (95 %-CI) | 2012 OR (95 %-CI) | |
| Dietary behaviors | ||||
| Vegetable intake < 5 days a week | 1.2 (0.8-1.8) | 0.8 (0.5-1.1) | 1.1 (0.8-1.7) | 0.7 (0.5-1.0)* |
| Fruit < 2 portions a day | 1.0 (0.7-1.5) | 0.7 (0.4-1.0) | 1.0 (0.7-1.6) | 0.8 (0.5-1.2) |
| Sugared drinks > 3 glasses a day | 1.4 (1.0-2.0) | 1.3 (0.9-1.9) | 1.2 (0.8-1.8) | 1.2 (0.8-1.8) |
| Physical activity behaviors | ||||
| Outside play < 1 h a day | 0.9 (0.6-1.3) | 0.8 (0.6-1.2) | 0.8 (0.6-1.2) | 1.0 (0.7-1.4) |
| Organized sports < 1 h a week | 1.13 (0.76-1.68) | 1.5 (1.0-2.4) | 1.1 (0.7-1.6) | 1.3 (0.8-2.0) |
| Sedentary behaviors | ||||
| TV viewing > 2 h a day | 1.5 (0.5-4.8) | 1.6 (1.0-2.7) | 1.2 (0.4-3.6) | 1.3 (0.8-2.3) |
| Screentime > 2 h a day | 1.1 (0.5-2.6) | 1.4 (1.0-2.0) | 1.0 (0.4-2.3) | 1.3 (0.9-1.8) |
| Weight status parent | ||||
| BMI mother - overweight | 3.0 (2.0-4.5)** | 2.0 (1.4-3.0)** | 2.9 (1.9-4.3)** | 1.8 (1.2-2.7)** |
| BMI father - overweight | 1.2 (0.8-1.8) | 1.7 (1.2-2.4)* | 1.2 (0.8-1.7) | 1.6 (1.1-2.4)* |
Abbreviations: BMI body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared), SES socioeconomic status, OR odds ratios, CI confidence interval
Decreasing BMI SDS group was set as reference
P-values: *p < 0.05 for difference between trajectories; **p < 0.001 for difference between trajectories
Fig. 2Changes in health related behaviors between 2006 and 2012 in the two BMI SDS trajectories. Depicted are the percentage of children who display the examined unhealthy behaviors in 2006 in each BMI SDS trajectory and the percentage of children who display these unhealthy behaviors in 2012, visualizing the change in behaviors per trajectory in six years time