| Literature DB >> 27790292 |
Alan Mackie1, Neil Rigby2, Pascale Harvey3, Balazs Bajka2.
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of the dietary fibre β-glucan on nutrient composition and mucus permeability. Pigs were fed a standard diet or a diet containing twice the β-glucan content for 3 days (n = 5 per group), followed by the collection of small intestinal mucus and tissue samples. Samples of the consumed diets were subjected to in vitro digestion to determine β-glucan release, nutrient profile and assessment of mucus permeability. In vitro digestion of the diets indicated that 90% of the β-glucan was released in the proximal small intestine. Measurements of intestinal mucus showed a reduction in permeability to 100 nm latex beads and also lipid from the digested enhanced β-glucan diet. The data from this study show for the first time that reducing mass transfer of bile and lipid through the intestinal mucus layer may be one way in which this decrease in bile reabsorption by soluble fibre is enabled.Entities:
Keywords: Beta-glucan; Dietary fibre; Diffusion; Mucus; Permeability; Porcine
Year: 2016 PMID: 27790292 PMCID: PMC5070621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2016.08.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Foods ISSN: 1756-4646 Impact factor: 4.451
The macronutrient of the control (55–100 finisher diet) and enhanced β-glucan diet composition (%).
| Control | OM10 (10% oat bran) | |
|---|---|---|
| Crude protein | 16.59 | 16.03 |
| Crude fat | 4.00 | 4.40 |
| Carbohydrate | 74.75 | 73.28 |
| Fibre (NDF) | 15.92 | 23.33 |
| β-Glucan | 0.7 | 1.4 |
| Gross energy (MJ/kg DM) | 13.35 | 13.52 |
A list of the qPCR primers used to follow expression of intestinal mucin genes.
| Gene name | Accession number | Primers | Tm (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUC1 | XM_001926883.1 | F: TTAAGTGCTGTGAGCGCAAC | 59.5 |
| R: TCTGGTAGGGCTGATGGTCA | 60.0 | ||
| MUC2 | AK231524.1 | F: AGGAAATGCATCCCTCGCAA | 60.0 |
| R: GGAGCAGTCGTTCATGGTCA | 60.0 | ||
| MUC4 | XM_005670136.2 | F: TTTCTGGAGCCATGAGGGGG | 61.6 |
| R: GTCATAGTGTTTCCACCCAGGAC | 60.9 | ||
| MUC5ac | AF054584.1 | F: CGTAGAGCACAGGTGCAAGT | 59.0 |
| R: GCAGGGTCACGTTTCTCAG | 59.0 |
Fig. 1Analysis of the macronutrient content of the Control and OM10 diets. Protein hydrolysis is shown in A, starch content in B, lipid hydrolysis products (mono- and di-glycerides and free fatty acids) in C and remaining triglycerides are shown in D. Data represented as the mean ± sem, n = 5 per group. Statistical significance was determined using a 2-way ANOVA (*P < 0.5 and ***P < 0.001 vs control Diet).
The concentrations (µM) of the bile acids found in intestinal mucus samples. The data are given as the mean and standard deviation.
| Bile acid | OM10 | Control | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| α-Muricholic acid (α-MCA) | 1.58 | 1.53 | 0.91 | 0.46 |
| β-Muricholic acid (β-MCA) | 0.53 | 0.44 | 1.07 | 0.96 |
| Cholic acid (CA) | 29.25 | 37.56 | 6.14 | 5.24 |
| Chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) | 290.12 | 241.84 | 430.34 | 392.05 |
| Deoxycholic acid (DCA) | 25.97 | 34.26 | 6.37 | 2.37 |
| Glycocholic acid (GCA) | 31.65 | 20.67 | 14.03 | 13.79 |
| Glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) | 23.97 | 34.84 | 2.37 | 1.95 |
| Glycodeoxycholic acid (GDCA) | 28.42 | 41.75 | 2.85 | 2.12 |
| Glycolithocholic acid (GLCA) | 16.86 | 19.33 | 16.91 | 19.93 |
| Hyodeoxycholic acid (HDCA) | 258.74 | 190.78 | 351.92 | 304.51 |
| Lithocholic acid (LCA) | 3.05 | 2.62 | 6.20 | 6.23 |
| Muricholic acid (MCA) | 15.89 | 20.43 | 52.04 | 49.48 |
| Tauro-α-mirocholic acid (T-α-MCA) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.39 |
| Taurocholic acid (TCA) | 12.41 | 11.10 | 4.73 | 2.46 |
| Taurochenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA) | 63.34 | 59.48 | 66.93 | 71.43 |
| Taurodeoxycholic acid (TDCA) | 2.94 | 3.31 | 0.94 | 0.40 |
| Taurolithocholic acid (TLCA) | 4.13 | 5.08 | 5.45 | 6.38 |
| Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) | 8.60 | 10.87 | 22.32 | 25.81 |
| ω-Muricholic acid (ω-MCA) | 1.96 | 1.95 | 4.06 | 3.93 |
| Taurohyodeoxycholate (THDC) | 214.52 | 205.29 | 249.05 | 266.52 |
| Glycohyodeoxycholate (GHDC) | 472.94 | 330.72 | 228.90 | 299.93 |
Fig. 2The average bile acid composition (% of total bile) in mucus samples taken from the intestines of pigs fed either the control diet (white) or OM10 diet (grey) plotted on a log scale. Data are presented as the mean ± sem, n = 5 per group. Statistical significance was determined using a 2-way ANOVA (**P < 0.01 vs control Diet).
Fig. 3Assessment of the mobility of (A) 100 nm and (B) 500 nm bile salt coated carboxylated polystyrene beads through small intestinal mucus ex vivo from pigs fed Control (open circles) or OM10 diets (closed circles). Mean squared displacement values were calculated over 50 frames (1.85 s for 100 nm beads and 25 s for 500 nm beads) and used to derive a Stokes viscosity (inserts). The viscosity is presented as the mean ± sem, n = 5. Statistical significance was determined using Students t-test (**P < 0.01 vs control Diet).
Fig. 4The diffusion coefficient of fluorescently labelled lipid from (A) the pig diet and (B) an emulsion following 120 min simulated duodenal digestion in intestinal mucus from pigs fed control or OM10 diets. The data are presented as the mean diffusion coefficient of lipid from the pig diets (open and closed bars represent digested control or OM10 diets respectively). The values shown are the mean ± sem, n = 5. Statistical significance was determined using a 2-way ANOVA (**P < 0.01 vs control Diet).
Relative abundance (2−ΔΔCt) of mucin genes in proximal small intestinal mucosa of pigs fed control or 10% oat bran diets. ΔΔCt was calculated using the average of 3 housekeeping genes (GAPDH, GSR and GPI). The data are given as the mean and standard deviation, n = 5.
| Gene name | Relative abundance | SD | Significance (P value) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUC1 | Control | 1.000 | 0.573 | 0.375 |
| OM10 | 1.196 | 0.926 | ||
| MUC2 | Control | 1.000 | 0.676 | 0.431 |
| OM10 | 0.917 | 0.442 | ||
| MUC4 | Control | 1.000 | 0.696 | 0.279 |
| OM10 | 0.377 | 0.386 | ||
| MUC5ac | Control | 1.000 | 0.776 | 0.140 |
| OM10 | 0.347 | 0.341 | ||