Literature DB >> 27789258

National Trends in Direct Health Care Expenditures Among US Adults With Migraine: 2004 to 2013.

Amit D Raval1, Anal Shah2.   

Abstract

Migraine is a common neurological disorder with significant economic burden in the United States. However, changes in the economic burden of migraine in the past decade have not been examined considering therapeutic advances at the national level. Therefore, we estimated cross-sectional trends in the incremental total and types of direct health care expenditures among individuals with migraine using nationally representative data, the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey. The analytic sample was comprised of an annually weighted population of 228,010,000 adults aged 18 years and older from 2004 to 2013. Two-part models were used to estimate the incremental total and types of annual direct health care expenditures (adjusted to 2013 US dollars) among individuals with migraine after adjusting for predisposing, enabling, need, personal health practice, and external environment factors selected on the basis of the Anderson Healthcare Behavior Model. The unadjusted average annual total health care expenditure for individuals with migraine was $8,033 (standard error [SE] = $292) which comprised major proportions of outpatient ($2,952, SE = $128), prescription drugs ($2,207, SE = $91), and inpatient ($1,784, SE = $178) expenditures. Individuals with migraine had $866 (SE = $298) and $1,519 (SE = $400) greater adjusted annual total direct health care expenditures in 2004/2005 and 2012/2013 compared with those without migraine. However, those with migraine in 2012/2013 did not have significant changes in the total direct health care expenditures compared with those having migraine in 2004/2005 (changes: -$330, SE = $480). The estimated adjusted incremental total direct health care expenditures for individuals with migraine was approximately $9.20 billion per year compared with those without migraine. PERSPECTIVE: Although annual incremental total direct health care expenditures among individuals with migraine did not change significantly from 2004 to 2013, expenditures remained significantly greater in the migraine population compared with those without migraine across the years. Our study findings suggest the need to design and implement policy and interventions to reduce excess health care expenditures among individuals with migraine.
Copyright © 2016 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-part model; Migraine; direct health care expenditures; economic burden; trends

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27789258     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  16 in total

1.  Efficacy of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in the Preventative Treatment of Episodic Migraine in Adults.

Authors:  T Dorosch; C A Ganzer; M Lin; A Seifan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-09-12

2.  Efficacy of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a trial sequential meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shi-Qi Fan; Song Jin; Tai-Chun Tang; Min Chen; Hui Zheng
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Health Care Utilization and Costs in Patients With Migraine Who Have Failed Previous Preventive Treatments.

Authors:  Lawrence Newman; Pamela Vo; Lujia Zhou; Cristina Lopez Lopez; Andy Cheadle; Melvin Olson; Juanzhi Fang
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-06

4.  Rimegepant, Ubrogepant, and Lasmiditan in the Acute Treatment of Migraine Examining the Benefit-Risk Profile Using Number Needed to Treat/Harm.

Authors:  Karissa M Johnston; Lauren Powell; Evan Popoff; Linda Harris; Robert Croop; Vladimir Coric; Gilbert L'Italien
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2022-11-01       Impact factor: 3.423

5.  Rimegepant for the treatment of migraine.

Authors:  Amnon A Berger; Ariel Winnick; Austin H Carroll; Alexandra Welschmeyer; Nathan Li; Marc Colon; Antonella Paladini; Giovanni F Ramírez; Jamal Hasoon; Elyse M Cornett; Jaehong Song; Giustino Varrassi; Adam M Kaye; Alan D Kaye; Latha Ganti
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2022-10-12

Review 6.  Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiuyuan Zhao; Xiaolin Xu; Qingyun Li
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies: the Next Era of Migraine Prevention?

Authors:  Amy R Tso; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Phase 1, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effects of erenumab (AMG 334) and concomitant sumatriptan on blood pressure in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jan de Hoon; Anne Van Hecken; Corinne Vandermeulen; Marissa Herbots; Yumi Kubo; Ed Lee; Osa Eisele; Gabriel Vargas; Kristin Gabriel
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 6.292

9.  United States Patients' Perspective of Living With Migraine: Country-Specific Results From the Global "My Migraine Voice" Survey.

Authors:  Sarah N Gibbs; Shweta Shah; Chinmay G Deshpande; Mark E Bensink; Michael S Broder; Paula K Dumas; Dawn C Buse; Pamela Vo; Todd J Schwedt
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.887

10.  Association of expression of DRD2 rs1800497 polymorphism with migraine risk in Han Chinese individuals.

Authors:  Yingfeng Deng; Jianping Huang; Huijun Zhang; Xueqin Zhu; Qin Gong
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.