Elisa Gervasoni1, Johanna Jonsdottir1, Angelo Montesano1, Davide Cattaneo2. 1. LaRiCE Gait and Balance Disorders Laboratory, Department of Neurorehabilitation, Don Gnocchi Foundation, Milan, Italy. 2. LaRiCE Gait and Balance Disorders Laboratory, Department of Neurorehabilitation, Don Gnocchi Foundation, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: dcattaneo@dongnocchi.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to define clinically meaningful patient's improvement on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in response to rehabilitation. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Neurorehabilitation institute. PARTICIPANTS: PwMS (N=110). INTERVENTIONS: This study comprised inpatients and outpatients who participated in research on balance and gait rehabilitation. All received 20 rehabilitation sessions with different intensities. Inpatients received daily treatments over a period of 4 weeks, while outpatients received 2 to 3 treatments per week for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An anchor-based approach using clinical global impression of improvement in balance (Activities-specific Balance Confidence [ABC] Scale) was used to determine the MCID of the BBS. The MCID was defined as the minimum change in the BBS total score (postintervention - preintervention) that was needed to perceive at least a 10% improvement on the ABC Scale. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the cutoff of the optimal MCID of the BBS discriminating between improved and not improved subjects. RESULTS: The MCID for change on the BBS was 3 points for the whole sample, 3 points for the inpatients, and 2 points for the outpatients. The area under the curve was .65 for the whole sample, .64 for inpatients, and .68 for outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: The MCID for improvement in balance as measured by the BBS was 3 points, meaning that PwMS are likely to perceive that as a reproducible and clinically important change in their balance performance.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to define clinically meaningful patient's improvement on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in response to rehabilitation. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Neurorehabilitation institute. PARTICIPANTS: PwMS (N=110). INTERVENTIONS: This study comprised inpatients and outpatients who participated in research on balance and gait rehabilitation. All received 20 rehabilitation sessions with different intensities. Inpatients received daily treatments over a period of 4 weeks, while outpatients received 2 to 3 treatments per week for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An anchor-based approach using clinical global impression of improvement in balance (Activities-specific Balance Confidence [ABC] Scale) was used to determine the MCID of the BBS. The MCID was defined as the minimum change in the BBS total score (postintervention - preintervention) that was needed to perceive at least a 10% improvement on the ABC Scale. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the cutoff of the optimal MCID of the BBS discriminating between improved and not improved subjects. RESULTS: The MCID for change on the BBS was 3 points for the whole sample, 3 points for the inpatients, and 2 points for the outpatients. The area under the curve was .65 for the whole sample, .64 for inpatients, and .68 for outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: The MCID for improvement in balance as measured by the BBS was 3 points, meaning that PwMS are likely to perceive that as a reproducible and clinically important change in their balance performance.
Authors: Klara Novotna; Marketa Janatova; Karel Hana; Olga Svestkova; Jana Preiningerova Lizrova; Eva Kubala Havrdova Journal: Mult Scler Int Date: 2019-12-23
Authors: Bobbette J Miller; Thubi Ha Kolobe; Rebecca D Larson; Brian A Pribble; Gabriel Pardo; Shirley A James Journal: Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Date: 2022-01-05
Authors: Cristina García-Muñoz; María Jesús Casuso-Holgado; Juan Carlos Hernández-Rodríguez; Elena Pinero-Pinto; Rocío Palomo-Carrión; María-Dolores Cortés-Vega Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ana Myriam Lavín-Pérez; Daniel Collado-Mateo; Alejandro Caña-Pino; Santos Villafaina; Jose Alberto Parraca; María Dolores Apolo-Arenas Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 2.650
Authors: Dario Calafiore; Marco Invernizzi; Antonio Ammendolia; Nicola Marotta; Francesco Fortunato; Teresa Paolucci; Francesco Ferraro; Claudio Curci; Agnieszka Cwirlej-Sozanska; Alessandro de Sire Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 4.003