Literature DB >> 27787706

Particle removal by vegetation: comparison in a forest and a wetland.

Jiakai Liu1, Jiexiu Zhai1, Lijuan Zhu1, Yilian Yang1, Jiatong Liu1, Zhenming Zhang2.   

Abstract

Vegetation collection is one of the most effective scavenging methods but relevant studies are limited. It can be described by some abstract parameters such as collection rates and deposition fluxes within the canopy. In order to estimate the dry deposition within the canopy of particular matters (PMs) in Beijing, a highly particle-polluted city, and reveal the PM pollution-removal abilities of plants in wetlands and forests, concentration and meteorological data were collected during the daytime in an artificial forest and a wetland in the Olympic Park in Beijing. The dry depositions within the canopy and vegetation collection rates were calculated by a well-developed model and validated by measured deposition fluxes in 11 random experiment days. The experiment year was divided into three plant growth stages based on canopy density, and the day was divided into four different times. Two heights, 10 and 1.5 m, were defined in the forest while in the wetland, 0.5 and 1.5 m were defined. The results showed that in Beijing, the most severe pollution by PMs occurs in the non-leaf stage (NS), and the full-leaf stage (FS) is the cleanest stage. In NS, namely winter, more fossil fuel was used for worms in Beijing and peripheral areas and this might be the reason for the serious pollution condition. Within the canopy, PM deposition fluxes in the wetland are more than those in the forest, but the vegetation collection rates of the forest are higher. The lower temperature conditions led to more dry deposition, and the larger canopy contributed to the higher collection rates. During the daytime, over the year, the deposition of PM10 in three plant growth stages is NS ≥ half-leaf stages (HS) ≥ FS, whereas the deposition of PM2.5 is NS ≥ FS ≥ HS, and during the daytime, the maximum deposition fluxes occur in 6:00-9:00 in the wetland while the minimum deposition values occur in 15:00-18:00. This phenomenon was related to the temporal variation of particle concentration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Different times; Dry deposition; Forest and wetland; Plant growth stages; Vegetation collection rate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27787706     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7790-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  12 in total

1.  Deposition to forests in Europe: most important factors influencing dry deposition and models used for generalisation.

Authors:  Jan Willem Erisman; Geert Draaijers
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Urban woodlands: their role in reducing the effects of particulate pollution.

Authors:  K P Beckett; P H Freer-Smith; G Taylor
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Deposition of particulate matter of different size fractions on leaf surfaces and in waxes of urban forest species.

Authors:  Kajetan Dzierzanowski; Robert Popek; Helena Gawrońska; Arne Saebø; Stanislaw W Gawroński
Journal:  Int J Phytoremediation       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.212

4.  Removal efficiency of particulate matters at different underlying surfaces in Beijing.

Authors:  Jiakai Liu; Lichun Mo; Lijuan Zhu; Yilian Yang; Jiatong Liu; Dongdong Qiu; Zhenming Zhang; Jinglan Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Dry deposition profile of small particles within a model spruce canopy.

Authors:  Zitouni Ould-Dada
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2002-03-08       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  The role of a peri-urban forest on air quality improvement in the Mexico City megalopolis.

Authors:  Darrel Baumgardner; Sebastian Varela; Francisco J Escobedo; Alicia Chacalo; Carlos Ochoa
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China.

Authors:  Ru-Jin Huang; Yanlin Zhang; Carlo Bozzetti; Kin-Fai Ho; Jun-Ji Cao; Yongming Han; Kaspar R Daellenbach; Jay G Slowik; Stephen M Platt; Francesco Canonaco; Peter Zotter; Robert Wolf; Simone M Pieber; Emily A Bruns; Monica Crippa; Giancarlo Ciarelli; Andrea Piazzalunga; Margit Schwikowski; Gülcin Abbaszade; Jürgen Schnelle-Kreis; Ralf Zimmermann; Zhisheng An; Sönke Szidat; Urs Baltensperger; Imad El Haddad; André S H Prévôt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Particulate matter assessment of a wetland in Beijing.

Authors:  Dongdong Qiu; Jiakai Liu; Lijuan Zhu; Lichun Mo; Zhenming Zhang
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.565

9.  Differences in accumulation of PAHs and metals on the leaves of Tiliaxeuchlora and Pyrus calleryana.

Authors:  Venera A Jouraeva; David L Johnson; John P Hassett; David J Nowak
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Particulate Matter and Dry Deposition Flux in the Cuihu Wetland of Beijing.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhu; Jiakai Liu; Ling Cong; Wenmei Ma; Wu Ma; Zhenming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Phyllostachys edulis forest reduces atmospheric PM2.5 and PAHs on hazy days at suburban area.

Authors:  Yu Fang Bi; Fei Yan Guo; Liu Yang; Hao Zhong; An Ke Wang; Yu Kui Wang; Zhi Zhuang Wu; Xu Hua Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Measuring and Quantifying Impacts of Environmental Parameters on Airborne Particulate Matter in Under-Viaducts Spaces in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Lihua Yin; Tian Hang; Fanfan Qin; Xueting Lin; Yiwen Han
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.