Literature DB >> 26308922

Removal efficiency of particulate matters at different underlying surfaces in Beijing.

Jiakai Liu1, Lichun Mo1, Lijuan Zhu1, Yilian Yang1, Jiatong Liu1, Dongdong Qiu1, Zhenming Zhang2, Jinglan Liu3.   

Abstract

Particulate matter (PM) pollution has been increasingly becoming serious in Beijing and has drawn the attention of the local government and general public. This study was conducted during early spring of 2013 and 2014 to monitor the concentration of PM at three different land surfaces (bare land, urban forest, and lake) in the Olympic Park in Beijing and to analyze its effect on the concentration of meteorological factors and the dry deposition onto different land cover types. The results showed that diurnal variation of PM concentrations at the three different land surfaces had no significant regulations, and sharp short-term increases in PM10 (particulate matter having an aerodynamic diameter <10 μm) occurred occasionally. The concentrations also differed from one land cover type to another at the same time, but the regulation was insignificant. The most important meteorological factor influencing the PM concentration is relative humidity; it is positively correlated with the PM concentration. While in the forests, the wind speed and irradiance also influenced the PM concentration by affecting the capture capacity of trees and dry deposition velocity. Other factors were not correlated with or influenced by the PM concentration. In addition, the hourly dry deposition in unit area (μg/m(2)) onto the three types of land surfaces and the removal efficiency based on the ratio of dry deposition and PM concentration were calculated. The results showed that the forest has the best removal capacity for both PM2.5 (particulate matter having an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm) and PM10 because of the faster deposition velocity and relatively low resuspension rate. The lake's PM10 removal efficiency is higher than that of the bare land because of the relatively higher PM resuspension rates on the bare land. However, the PM2.5 removal efficiency is lower than that of the bare land because of the significantly lower dry deposition velocity.

Keywords:  Dry deposition; Meteorological factors; Particulate matter; Removal efficiency; Underlying surfaces

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26308922     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5252-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  13 in total

1.  Pollution mitigation and carbon sequestration by an urban forest.

Authors:  C L Brack
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Deposition to forests in Europe: most important factors influencing dry deposition and models used for generalisation.

Authors:  Jan Willem Erisman; Geert Draaijers
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Urban woodlands: their role in reducing the effects of particulate pollution.

Authors:  K P Beckett; P H Freer-Smith; G Taylor
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Deposition of particulate matter of different size fractions on leaf surfaces and in waxes of urban forest species.

Authors:  Kajetan Dzierzanowski; Robert Popek; Helena Gawrońska; Arne Saebø; Stanislaw W Gawroński
Journal:  Int J Phytoremediation       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.212

5.  Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile's policy of using urban forests to improve air quality.

Authors:  Francisco J Escobedo; John E Wagner; David J Nowak; Carmen Luz De la Maza; Manuel Rodriguez; Daniel E Crane
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Dry deposition profile of small particles within a model spruce canopy.

Authors:  Zitouni Ould-Dada
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2002-03-08       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  The role of a peri-urban forest on air quality improvement in the Mexico City megalopolis.

Authors:  Darrel Baumgardner; Sebastian Varela; Francisco J Escobedo; Alicia Chacalo; Carlos Ochoa
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities.

Authors:  D W Dockery; C A Pope; X Xu; J D Spengler; J H Ware; M E Fay; B G Ferris; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Modeled PM2.5 removal by trees in ten U.S. cities and associated health effects.

Authors:  David J Nowak; Satoshi Hirabayashi; Allison Bodine; Robert Hoehn
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 8.071

10.  Characteristics of atmospheric aerosol and acidic gases from urban and forest sites in central taiwan.

Authors:  Man-Ting Cheng; Chuen-Liang Horng; Yu-Chi Lin
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  6 in total

1.  Particle removal by vegetation: comparison in a forest and a wetland.

Authors:  Jiakai Liu; Jiexiu Zhai; Lijuan Zhu; Yilian Yang; Jiatong Liu; Zhenming Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Particulate Matter and Dry Deposition Flux in the Cuihu Wetland of Beijing.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhu; Jiakai Liu; Ling Cong; Wenmei Ma; Wu Ma; Zhenming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Multi-scale comparison of the fine particle removal capacity of urban forests and wetlands.

Authors:  Zhenming Zhang; Jiakai Liu; Yanan Wu; Guoxin Yan; Lijuan Zhu; Xinxiao Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  PM2.5 Spatiotemporal Variations and the Relationship with Meteorological Factors during 2013-2014 in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Fangfang Huang; Xia Li; Chao Wang; Qin Xu; Wei Wang; Yanxia Luo; Lixin Tao; Qi Gao; Jin Guo; Sipeng Chen; Kai Cao; Long Liu; Ni Gao; Xiangtong Liu; Kun Yang; Aoshuang Yan; Xiuhua Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Spatiotemporal Changes in PM2.5 and Their Relationships with Land-Use and People in Hangzhou.

Authors:  Li Tian; Wei Hou; Jiquan Chen; Chaonan Chen; Xiaojun Pan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Understanding PM2.5 concentration and removal efficiency variation in urban forest park-Observation at human breathing height.

Authors:  Guoxin Yan; Zibo Yu; Yanan Wu; Jiakai Liu; Yu Wang; Jiexiu Zhai; Ling Cong; Zhenming Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.