Erika L Abramson1, Vaishali Patel, Elizabeth R Pfoh, Rainu Kaushal. 1. Erika Abramson, MD, MS, Departments of Pediatrics and Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, Rm M 610A, New York, NY 10065, Tel: 212-746-3929, Fax: 212-746-3140, Email: err9009@med.cornell.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physicians are expending tremendous resources transitioning to new electronic health records (EHRs), with electronic prescribing as a key functionality of most systems. Physician dissatisfaction post-transition can be quite marked, especially initially. However, little is known about how physicians' experiences using new EHRs for e-prescribing evolve over time. We previously published a qualitative case study about the early physician experience transitioning from an older to a newer, more robust EHR, in the outpatient setting, focusing on their perceptions of the electronic prescribing functionality. OBJECTIVE: Our current objective was to examine how perceptions about using the new HER evolved over time, again with a focus on electronic prescribing. METHODS: We interviewed thirteen internists at an academic medical center-affiliated ambulatory care clinic who transitioned to the new EHR two years prior. We used a grounded theory approach to analyze semi-structured interviews and generate key themes. RESULTS: We identified five themes: efficiency and usability, effects on safety, ongoing training requirements, customization, and competing priorities for the EHR. We found that for even experienced e-prescribers, achieving prior levels of perceived prescribing efficiency took nearly two years. Despite the fact that speed in performing prescribing-related tasks was highly important, most were still not utilizing system short cuts or customization features designed to maximize efficiency. Alert fatigue remained common. However, direct transmission of prescriptions to pharmacies was highly valued and its benefits generally outweighed the other features considered poorly designed for physician workflow. CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring that physicians are able to do key prescribing tasks efficiently is critical to the perceived value of e-prescribing applications. However, successful transitions may take longer than expected and e-prescribing system features that do not support workflow or require constant upgrades may further prolong the process. Additionally, as system features continually evolve, physicians may need ongoing training and support to maintain efficiency.
BACKGROUND: Physicians are expending tremendous resources transitioning to new electronic health records (EHRs), with electronic prescribing as a key functionality of most systems. Physician dissatisfaction post-transition can be quite marked, especially initially. However, little is known about how physicians' experiences using new EHRs for e-prescribing evolve over time. We previously published a qualitative case study about the early physician experience transitioning from an older to a newer, more robust EHR, in the outpatient setting, focusing on their perceptions of the electronic prescribing functionality. OBJECTIVE: Our current objective was to examine how perceptions about using the new HER evolved over time, again with a focus on electronic prescribing. METHODS: We interviewed thirteen internists at an academic medical center-affiliated ambulatory care clinic who transitioned to the new EHR two years prior. We used a grounded theory approach to analyze semi-structured interviews and generate key themes. RESULTS: We identified five themes: efficiency and usability, effects on safety, ongoing training requirements, customization, and competing priorities for the EHR. We found that for even experienced e-prescribers, achieving prior levels of perceived prescribing efficiency took nearly two years. Despite the fact that speed in performing prescribing-related tasks was highly important, most were still not utilizing system short cuts or customization features designed to maximize efficiency. Alert fatigue remained common. However, direct transmission of prescriptions to pharmacies was highly valued and its benefits generally outweighed the other features considered poorly designed for physician workflow. CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring that physicians are able to do key prescribing tasks efficiently is critical to the perceived value of e-prescribing applications. However, successful transitions may take longer than expected and e-prescribing system features that do not support workflow or require constant upgrades may further prolong the process. Additionally, as system features continually evolve, physicians may need ongoing training and support to maintain efficiency.
Authors: Erika L Abramson; Vaishali Patel; Sameer Malhotra; Elizabeth R Pfoh; S Nena Osorio; Adam Cheriff; Curt L Cole; Arwen Bunce; Joan Ash; Rainu Kaushal Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Nidhi R Shah; Andrew C Seger; Diane L Seger; Julie M Fiskio; Gilad J Kuperman; Barry Blumenfeld; Elaine G Recklet; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2005-10-12 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Joan S Ash; Dean F Sittig; Veena Seshadri; Richard H Dykstra; James D Carpenter; P Zoe Stavri Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Shobha Phansalkar; Heleen van der Sijs; Alisha D Tucker; Amrita A Desai; Douglas S Bell; Jonathan M Teich; Blackford Middleton; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jesse C Crosson; Nicole Isaacson; Debra Lancaster; Emily A McDonald; Anthony J Schueth; Barbara DiCicco-Bloom; Joshua L Newman; C Jason Wang; Douglas S Bell Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Blackford Middleton; Meryl Bloomrosen; Mark A Dente; Bill Hashmat; Ross Koppel; J Marc Overhage; Thomas H Payne; S Trent Rosenbloom; Charlotte Weaver; Jiajie Zhang Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Saul N Weingart; Michael Massagli; Adrienne Cyrulik; Thomas Isaac; Laurinda Morway; Daniel Z Sands; Joel S Weissman Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Duwayne L Willett; Vaishnavi Kannan; Ling Chu; Joel R Buchanan; Ferdinand T Velasco; John D Clark; Jason S Fish; Adolfo R Ortuzar; Josh E Youngblood; Deepa G Bhat; Mujeeb A Basit Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Nuraini Nazeha; Deepali Pavagadhi; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Josip Car; Geronimo Jimenez; Lorainne Tudor Car Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 5.428