Literature DB >> 27785387

Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers in Pinus armandii (Pinaceae), an endemic conifer species to China.

Wan-Lin Dong1, Ruo-Nan Wang1, Xiao-Hao Yan1, Chuan Niu1, Lin-Lin Gong1, Zhong-Hu Li1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Pinus armandii (Pinaceae) is an important conifer tree species in central and southwestern China, and it plays a key role in the local forest ecosystems. To investigate its population genetics and design effective conservation strategies, we characterized 18 polymorphic microsatellite markers for this species. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Eighteen novel polymorphic and 16 monomorphic microsatellite loci of P. armandii were isolated using Illumina MiSeq technology. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to five. The expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.061 to 0.609 with an average of 0.384, and the observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.063 to 0.947 with an average of 0.436. Seventeen loci could be successfully transferred to five related Pinus species (P. koraiensis, P. griffithii, P. sibirica, P. pumila, and P. bungeana).
CONCLUSIONS: These novel microsatellites could potentially be used to investigate the population genetics of P. armandii and related species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pinaceae; Pinus armandii; cross-amplification; microsatellite markers; polymorphism; population genetics

Year:  2016        PMID: 27785387      PMCID: PMC5077286          DOI: 10.3732/apps.1600072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


Pinus armandii Franch. (Pinaceae) is an evergreen conifer tree species that is endemic to central and southwestern China (Fu et al., 1999). As a dominant species in warm- and cold-temperate forests, P. armandii plays a key role in the local ecosystems (Willyard et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2014). Previous studies of P. armandii focused mainly on its physiological ecology (Xiong et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2014), phylogenetic relationships, and phylogeographic structure (Liu et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015). In recent years, due to overcutting and destruction of natural habitats, the natural populations of P. armandii have been dramatically decreasing (Wang et al., 2014). It is important to gain knowledge of population genetic structure and genetic diversity of P. armandii to formulate effective conservation and management strategies. In addition, the closely related species P. koraiensis Siebold & Zucc., P. griffithii McClell., P. sibirica Du Tour, P. pumila (Pall.) Regel, and P. bungeana Zucc. ex Endl., which form a clade with P. armandii within subg. Strobus (D. Don) Lemmon (Liu et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015), are also important forest species in eastern Asia. In this study, we developed and characterized polymorphic microsatellite loci (simple sequence repeats [SSRs]) of P. armandii and its relatives to facilitate studies of their population genetics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Genomic DNA was extracted from a fresh needle (specimen no.: WNU-NG-SX-2013-LZH-036) of P. armandii using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and was sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) at Shanghai Genesky Biotechnologies (Shanghai, China) with 2 × 300-bp paired-end sequencing and MiSeq Reagent Kit version 3 (Illumina). A total of 6,783,777 clean reads were obtained after the adapter and low-quality sequences were removed. These clean reads were further assembled into 350,628 contigs using CLC Genomics Workbench version 7.5 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). The set of detailed parameters were: mismatch cost of 2, length fraction of 0.4, similarity fraction of 0.4, insertion cost of 2, deletion cost of 2, and a minimum contig length of 200 nucleotides. We extracted the contigs containing microsatellite markers with SciRoKo version 3.1 (Kofler et al., 2007), using default identification criteria used for mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeats, with a minimum of 14, seven, five, four, four, and four repeats, respectively. In total, 887 microsatellite-containing contigs were obtained. Then, forward and reverse primers were designed with Primer Premier version 7.0 software (Clarke and Gorley, 2015). The criteria for primer design were as follows: (1) product size from 100 to 350 bp; (2) primer size from 18 to 25 bp with an optimum size of 20 bp; (3) primer melting temperate from 55°C to 63°C with an optimum temperature of 60°C; and (4) GC content of primers from 40% to 60%. Fifty pairs of primers containing microsatellite repeats were randomly selected to test amplification efficiency and polymorphism in 52 individuals from three natural populations of P. armandii (Appendix 1). PCR amplification was performed in a 10-μL reaction volume containing 10 ng DNA template, 5 μL 2× polymerase mixture, 0.2 μM of each primer, and 3.6 μL ddH2O. The PCR profiles were as follows: an initial denaturation of 5 min at 95°C; 35 cycles of denaturation of 30 s at 95°C, at the appropriate annealing temperature (Table 1) for 30 s, and an extension of 30 s at 72°C; followed by a final extension of 5 min at 72°C. The PCR amplification products were separated in 10% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels and were visualized by silver staining.
Table 1.

Characteristics of 34 microsatellite primers developed for Pinus armandii.

LocusaPrimer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifTa (°C)Allele size range (bp)AGenBank accession no.
Pa83F: TAGTGTGGGAGTGGGAGGAA(AG)1062208–2205KU373058
R: CCCACACCCTCTCCCTACTT
Pa1539F: AATTTTAGATGTAAAGCCTCATG(TA)1253204–2102KU373059
R: TTGTGAACTAACTTTGGTGGG
Pa2226F: CATTGATCCTCAGCAGGTAG(TA)1255254–2642KU373060
R: TATTGTTGTTTCATTCCCAC
Pa2423F: ATGACCAAATCACCCACAAA(ATTT)455136–1482KU373061
R: TTTGACTTGGGTCAAATCCC
Pa26711F: CAAGGTCAAGGTAAGGTTAAGGG(AACCTT)560107–1213KU373062
R: AAGGTTAAGGTTAAGGTTAGGTTAAGG
Pa3553F: AAGATTAAATCCCTAGCATCTACC(ATTT)559341–3615KU373063
R: TGTCCACGAGTTCTGCTCTGT
Pa3701F: TCATTACAGATGGCTGCGTC(AT)1359203–2072KU373064
R: CCCAGTCGGAATCCTGTAAA
Pa5960F: TTACCCTAGCCACGACTATGC(GCCTA)655204–2093KU373065
R: GCTGCGTAAGGTTCGGTTAG
Pa10136F: CCATATGGTCACGCTACCTCT(TTA)559289–2984KU373066
R: TATGGAGTCAAGGTGGGAGC
Pa11411F: GAGAGGCCTGTCATGGAGTC(AGG)653104–1072KU373067
R: TAAAGGAGGCAGACCACGTC
Pa12333F: CCTTAACCTTAACCTTAACCTAACC(AACCTT)759232–2403KU373068
R: TTGACCTTGACGAAACCCTT
Pa15326F: CCCTTAACCTTAACCTTAACCTGAG(AAGGTT)459138–1444KU373069
R: CCCTAACCTTGACCAAACCC
Pa118137F: TACCAGTGCTCTTGGACTTGTGT(GAT)86287–964KU373070
R: GAAAGTCACCATCCTCACCCTC
Pa180916F: CACATACACATCTATCTGCAAGC(AT)195994–1063KU373071
R: GTACCACCAGCTGATATTTGACA
Pa5962F: CCCTACCCATACACTACCCTAGC(CCTAA)565238–2443KX254165
R: AGGATGGTCTAGGATGGGCT
Pa14201F: TTCATAGGTTGTCAAGAAAGAGG(AT)1257232–2382KX254166
R: AATAACAAGCCAAAGAAATCTCA
Pa5418F: AGGGCGTGACAGTTGGTATC(TTA)855226–2382KX254167
R: TGTCCTCCTCTTGCACAATG
Pa8608F: GGGTTTGGTCAAGGTTAGGG(TAAGGT)457238–2443KX254168
R: AAGGTTTGGTCAAGGTTAGGG
Pa2181F: GAGAGAGCGTGTATGTTTGGG(AG)20622161KX254169
R: TCATCTCTCTTTCCCTCCCTC
Pa3455F: ATGCTAGGCAAGGTAAGGCT(CTAGG)4602081KX254170
R: CCTATCCAATCGTAGCCCAA
Pa5890F: GGCTTGGGAGATTCTCGG(CTCTGC)4561501KX254171
R: GCAAAGAAGCAAATGAAGGC
Pa6516F: AAACATGGTGACCCAAGCAT(AAT)956951KX254172
R: TTGAAGTCATCTTGTAATGTACTTGTC
Pa9058F: ACTTGGTAACCTTTCGCTTCT(TA)14551271KX254173
R: TGTGGATTTAAATGGAGATGAAA
Pa9864F: CCTTAACCTTAACCTAACCTTAACCT(GTTAAG)6601811KX254174
R: CCCTAACCTTGACCAAACCC
Pa12494F: AAGGACCTAGCCTTCTTGGG(TTGA)6521651KX254175
R: GCCCAATGGATTAATCTTCC
Pa18101F: TTGTTTGACACATCTAACAAGACC(TA)14612061KX254176
R: GATGGTTGAACTACATTTGGCA
Pa19210F: CACAATGTATCAATGGTCCG(AAT)8603301KX254177
R: ACAAGTGTTGAGTTAGGCGTAG
Pa86828F: GATTGGGGTTTATGAATGCTT(TG)12591721KX254178
R: AGAAAATAAACAATAGCGAGAGC
Pa117430F: AGAGATAGAAAGGGGGGGAG(AG)1259981KX254179
R: TTTGTCTCTTTATCTCACCCC
Pa120817F: CAACGATCCATGATGACCCTG(ACAT)5562041KX254180
R: TGCCTTGGCTATGTTGGGAA
Pa832F: CAATCTCTCCCCATTTCTATC(AATA)6582361KX254181
R: CCTCCCACTCCCACACTATC
Pa101F: GGAGACAGGGAGAGAGAGCA(GA)14552721KX254182
R: TAGGATAGGCTAGGCGAGGC
Pa3849F: GGGTGTTACACTAACCCAGCC(CCTAA)4592381KX254183
R: GCAACTCCTACTTCAGGTGTGT
Pa23367F: GGGAGGGAAGAAGAAAGACA(GA)14602401KX254184
R: CCCTACCTCTCTCCACTCTCTCT

Note: A = number of alleles; Ta = annealing temperature.

The first 18 primer pairs were determined to be polymorphic in Pinus armandii.

Characteristics of 34 microsatellite primers developed for Pinus armandii. Note: A = number of alleles; Ta = annealing temperature. The first 18 primer pairs were determined to be polymorphic in Pinus armandii. The allele sizes for each individual were automatically determined using Quantity One (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA) with pBR322 DNA/MspI as DNA molecular-weight marker. The program GenAlEx version 6.501 (Peakall and Smouse, 2012) was used to evaluate various population genetic parameters of microsatellite loci, including the number of alleles per locus, expected and observed heterozygosity (He and Ho), and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). In addition, linkage disequilibrium (LD) among loci was detected using GENEPOP version 4.2.2 (Rousset, 2008). We also detected the null allele frequencies for each primer with MICRO-CHECKER version 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al., 2004). In total, 34 primer pairs were successfully amplified with high-quality PCR products, with 18 of them exhibiting polymorphisms (Table 1). The number of alleles of these polymorphic primers ranged from two to five with an average of 2.4. He ranged from 0.061 to 0.609 with an average of 0.384, and Ho ranged from 0.063 to 0.947 with an average of 0.436. Two pairs of primers (Pa3553 and Pa118137) were found to deviate greatly from HWE, while we did not detect any LD between loci. This deviation might have been caused by insufficient sample size, nonrandom mating between individuals, migration, and/or natural selection of these two loci. In addition, no null alleles were detected for any locus in the current study. The detailed SSR characteristics are provided in Table 2.
Table 2.

Locus-specific measures of genetic diversity across three populations of Pinus armandii.

YT population (n = 16)NG population (n = 17)XH population (n = 19)
LocusAHoHeHWEbAHoHeHWEbAHoHeHWEb
Pa8330.5630.5760.19640.7500.6070.43740.3680.3590.050
Pa1539M20.2350.3600.15420.1580.1450.709
Pa222620.0630.0610.89720.5290.3890.13820.5790.4500.212
Pa242320.2500.3750.18220.2940.2510.47720.1580.2290.178
Pa2671120.1250.2190.08620.2940.2510.47720.3680.3010.325
Pa355320.5000.3750.18250.8820.6040.001*20.5260.3880.120
Pa3701M20.1760.3270.05820.4740.4500.820
Pa596020.2500.3750.18220.2350.2080.58230.4740.4500.648
Pa10136M40.4120.3890.35430.1580.1480.987
Pa1141120.5000.3750.18220.5880.4150.08620.3160.3880.418
Pa1233320.3750.4690.42420.5000.3750.21230.4210.4810.844
Pa1532630.2500.2250.95520.2940.2510.47740.3160.3930.141
Pa11813740.8750.6090.000*30.8820.5170.01430.9470.5480.000*
Pa180916MM30.1050.1010.996
Pa596220.6880.4980.12820.7060.4980.08630.5790.5360.628
Pa1420120.3130.4040.36420.4710.4840.90620.3680.4940.267
Pa541820.6250.4300.06920.4120.3890.81220.6840.4780.060
Pa860820.1880.1700.67920.6470.5000.22520.4740.4940.855

Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; M = monomorphic fragment; n = number of individuals sampled.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

P value of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test (*P < 0.001).

Locus-specific measures of genetic diversity across three populations of Pinus armandii. Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; M = monomorphic fragment; n = number of individuals sampled. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. P value of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test (*P < 0.001). To explore the broader utility of the SSR loci developed here, we amplified the primers in 20 individuals from five other species closely related to P. armandii (Appendix 1). Seventeen of the 18 primers produced robust, usually polymorphic DNA fragments across P. koraiensis, P. griffithii, P. sibirica, P. pumila, and P. bungeana. However, Pa3553 was not successfully amplified in P. pumila and P. bungeana (Table 3).
Table 3.

Results of tests of cross-amplification of the 18 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed for Pinus armandii in each of five related Pinus taxa.

Species nameNPa83Pa1539Pa2226Pa2423Pa26711Pa3553Pa3701Pa5960Pa10136Pa11411Pa12333Pa15326Pa118137Pa180916Pa5962Pa14201Pa5418Pa8608
P. koraiensis6221243221122312122
P. griffithii5332231121311212212
P. sibirica2411223112122112121
P. pumila212123111112112222
P. bungeana511123211212122121

Note: — = no amplification; N = number of individuals sampled.

Numbers presented for each locus represent number of alleles observed.

Results of tests of cross-amplification of the 18 polymorphic microsatellite markers developed for Pinus armandii in each of five related Pinus taxa. Note: — = no amplification; N = number of individuals sampled. Numbers presented for each locus represent number of alleles observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, we developed 18 polymorphic and 16 monomorphic loci for P. armandii, with allele numbers ranging from two to five for the polymorphic loci. These microsatellite markers will be useful for conservation genetic studies of P. armandii, such as those detecting genetic diversity and patterns of gene flow within and between populations. An assessment of their genetic information will also contribute to addressing how declining populations of P. armandii affect genetic diversity and gene flow, and will be useful more broadly in subg. Strobus.
Appendix 1.

Voucher information for Pinus species used in this study. All vouchers were deposited at the Herbarium of the College of Life Sciences (WNU), Northwest University, Xi’an, China.

SpeciesVoucher specimen accession no.Collection locality (Population code)Geographic coordinatesN
P. armandii Franch.WNU-YT-TB-2014-LZH-022Yupu town, Tibet Province (YT)29°37′15″N, 96°18′11″E16
P. armandiiWNU-NG-SX-2013-LZH-036Mt. Nangong, Shaanxi Province (NG) 32°13′48″N, 109°1′12″E17
P. armandiiWNU-XH-SX-2013-LZH-087Xunhua, Qinghai Province (XH)35°48′56″N, 102°42′16″E19
P. koraiensis Siebold & Zucc.WNU-BS-PK-2013-LZH-049Baishan, Jilin Province41°56′24″N, 127°35′24″E6
P. griffithii McClell.WNU-JL-PG-2013-LZH-032Jilong, Tibet Province28°30′36″N, 85°13′12″E5
P. sibirica Du TourWNU-BJ-PS-2013-LZH-008Buerjing, Xinjiang Province48°25′30″N, 86°6′4″E2
P. pumila (Pall.) RegelWNU-GH-PP-2013-LZH-003Genghe, Neimenggu Province52°21′55″N, 122°28′24″E2
P. bungeana Zucc. ex Endl.WNU-WZ-PB-2014-LZH-055Wuzishan, Shaanxi Province32°55′59″N, 107°49′59″E5

Note: LZH = Zhonghu Li, collector; N = number of individuals sampled.

  6 in total

1.  Fossil calibration of molecular divergence infers a moderate mutation rate and recent radiations for pinus.

Authors:  Ann Willyard; Willyard Ann; John Syring; David S Gernandt; Aaron Liston; Richard Cronn
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  SciRoKo: a new tool for whole genome microsatellite search and investigation.

Authors:  Robert Kofler; Christian Schlötterer; Tamas Lelley
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux.

Authors:  François Rousset
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Does animal-mediated seed dispersal facilitate the formation of Pinus armandii-Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata forests?

Authors:  Fei Yu; Dexiang Wang; Xianfeng Yi; Xiaoxiao Shi; Yakun Huang; Hongwu Zhang; XinPing Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phylogeography of Pinus armandii and its relatives: heterogeneous contributions of geography and climate changes to the genetic differentiation and diversification of Chinese white pines.

Authors:  Liu Liu; Zhen-Zhen Hao; Yan-Yan Liu; Xiao-Xin Wei; Yu-Zhi Cun; Xiao-Quan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Morphological and Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Three Species of Five-Needle Pines: Insights Into Phenotypic Evolution and Phylogeny.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Kewei Cai; Qiushuang Zhao; Hanxi Li; Xuelai Wang; Mulualem Tigabu; Ronald Sederoff; Wenjun Ma; Xiyang Zhao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Disentangling the effects of species interactions and environmental factors on the spatial pattern and coexistence of two congeneric Pinus species in a transitional climatic zone.

Authors:  Zhichun Yang; Ying Luo; Nan Ye; Lishunan Yang; Qiulong Yin; Shihong Jia; Chunmei He; Zuoqiang Yuan; Zhanqing Hao; Arshad Ali
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-11       Impact factor: 3.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.