Jason Amatoury1, Ali Azarbarzin2, Magdy Younes3,4, Amy S Jordan5, Andrew Wellman2, Danny J Eckert1. 1. Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), and the School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2. Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3. YRT Ltd, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 4. Sleep Disorders Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 5. Institute for Breathing and Sleep, and Melbourne School of Physiological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Arousals from sleep vary in duration and intensity. Accordingly, the physiological consequences of different types of arousals may also vary. Factors that influence arousal intensity are only partly understood. This study aimed to determine if arousal intensity is mediated by the strength of the preceding respiratory stimulus, and investigate other factors mediating arousal intensity and its role on post-arousal ventilatory and pharyngeal muscle responses. METHODS: Data were acquired in 71 adults (17 controls, 54 obstructive sleep apnea patients) instrumented with polysomnography equipment plus genioglossus and tensor palatini electromyography (EMG), a nasal mask and pneumotachograph, and an epiglottic pressure sensor. Transient reductions in CPAP were delivered during sleep to induce respiratory-related arousals. Arousal intensity was measured using a validated 10-point scale. RESULTS: Average arousal intensity was not related to the magnitude of the preceding respiratory stimuli but was positively associated with arousal duration, time to arousal, rate of change in epiglottic pressure and negatively with BMI (R2 > 0.10, P ≤ 0.006). High (> 5) intensity arousals caused greater ventilatory responses than low (≤ 5) intensity arousals (10.9 [6.8-14.5] vs. 7.8 [4.7-12.9] L/min; P = 0.036) and greater increases in tensor palatini EMG (10 [3-17] vs. 6 [2-11]%max; P = 0.031), with less pronounced increases in genioglossus EMG. CONCLUSIONS: Average arousal intensity is independent of the preceding respiratory stimulus. This is consistent with arousal intensity being a distinct trait. Respiratory and pharyngeal muscle responses increase with arousal intensity. Thus, patients with higher arousal intensities may be more prone to respiratory control instability. These findings are important for sleep apnea pathogenesis.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Arousals from sleep vary in duration and intensity. Accordingly, the physiological consequences of different types of arousals may also vary. Factors that influence arousal intensity are only partly understood. This study aimed to determine if arousal intensity is mediated by the strength of the preceding respiratory stimulus, and investigate other factors mediating arousal intensity and its role on post-arousal ventilatory and pharyngeal muscle responses. METHODS: Data were acquired in 71 adults (17 controls, 54 obstructive sleep apneapatients) instrumented with polysomnography equipment plus genioglossus and tensor palatini electromyography (EMG), a nasal mask and pneumotachograph, and an epiglottic pressure sensor. Transient reductions in CPAP were delivered during sleep to induce respiratory-related arousals. Arousal intensity was measured using a validated 10-point scale. RESULTS: Average arousal intensity was not related to the magnitude of the preceding respiratory stimuli but was positively associated with arousal duration, time to arousal, rate of change in epiglottic pressure and negatively with BMI (R2 > 0.10, P ≤ 0.006). High (> 5) intensity arousals caused greater ventilatory responses than low (≤ 5) intensity arousals (10.9 [6.8-14.5] vs. 7.8 [4.7-12.9] L/min; P = 0.036) and greater increases in tensor palatini EMG (10 [3-17] vs. 6 [2-11]%max; P = 0.031), with less pronounced increases in genioglossus EMG. CONCLUSIONS: Average arousal intensity is independent of the preceding respiratory stimulus. This is consistent with arousal intensity being a distinct trait. Respiratory and pharyngeal muscle responses increase with arousal intensity. Thus, patients with higher arousal intensities may be more prone to respiratory control instability. These findings are important for sleep apnea pathogenesis.
Authors: Amy S Jordan; Danny J Eckert; Andrew Wellman; John A Trinder; Atul Malhotra; David P White Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Vanessa Wilkinson; Atul Malhotra; Christian L Nicholas; Christopher Worsnop; Amy S Jordan; Jane E Butler; Julian P Saboisky; Simon C Gandevia; David P White; John Trinder Journal: Sleep Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Jayne C Carberry; Hanna Hensen; Lauren P Fisher; Julian P Saboisky; Jane E Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Danny J Eckert Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2015-03-06
Authors: Ali Azarbarzin; Michele Ostrowski; Magdy Younes; Brendan T Keenan; Allan I Pack; Bethany Staley; Samuel T Kuna Journal: Sleep Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Danny J Eckert; David P White; Amy S Jordan; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Scott A Sands; Kevin P Grace; Ali Azarbarzin; Ludovico Messineo; Rebecca Salant; David P White; D Andrew Wellman Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Diego R Mazzotti; Diane C Lim; Kate Sutherland; Lia Bittencourt; Jesse W Mindel; Ulysses Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Jason Amatoury; Amy S Jordan; Barbara Toson; Chinh Nguyen; Andrew Wellman; Danny J Eckert Journal: Sleep Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Scott A Sands; Philip I Terrill; Bradley A Edwards; Luigi Taranto Montemurro; Ali Azarbarzin; Melania Marques; Camila M de Melo; Stephen H Loring; James P Butler; David P White; Andrew Wellman Journal: Sleep Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Christine H J Won; Michelle Reid; Tamar Sofer; Ali Azarbarzin; Shaun Purcell; David White; Andrew Wellman; Scott Sands; Susan Redline Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Diane C Lim; Diego R Mazzotti; Kate Sutherland; Jesse W Mindel; Jinyoung Kim; Peter A Cistulli; Ulysses J Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Ali Azarbarzin; Scott A Sands; Luigi Taranto-Montemurro; Daniel Vena; Tamar Sofer; Sang-Wook Kim; Katie L Stone; David P White; Andrew Wellman; Susan Redline Journal: Chest Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: P G R Burke; S G Carter; F Knapman; J Patti; M Butlin; S C Gandevia; J E Butler; D J Eckert; L E Bilston Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 11.205