Matthew J Klebanoff1, Jagpreet Chhatwal2, Jacob D Nudel3, Kathleen E Corey4, Lee M Kaplan4, Chin Hur2. 1. Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston2Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston3Now at Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston2Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston4Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts5Now at Department of Surgery, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston4Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Severe obesity affects 4% to 6% of US youth and is increasing in prevalence. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of adolescents with severe obesity is becoming more common, but data on cost-effectiveness are limited. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for adolescents with obesity using recently published results from the Teen-Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. Design, Setting, and Patients: A state-transition model was constructed to compare 2 strategies: no surgery and bariatric surgery. In the no surgery strategy, patients remained at their initial body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) over time. In the bariatric surgery strategy, patients were subjected to risks of perioperative mortality and complications as well as initial morbidity but also experienced longer-term quality-of-life improvements associated with weight loss. Cohort demographic information-of the 228 patients included, the mean (SD) age was 17 (1.6) years, the mean (range) body mass index was 53 (34-88), and 171 (75.0%) were female-surgery-related outcomes, and base case time horizon (3 years) were based on data from the Teen-Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs (in US dollars adjusted to 2015-year values using the Consumer Price Index), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY was used to assess cost-effectiveness. Results: After 3 years, surgery led to a gain of 0.199 QALYs compared with no surgery at an incremental cost of $30 747, yielding an unfavorable ICER of $154 684 per QALY. When the clinical study results were extrapolated to 4 years, the ICER decreased to $114 078 per QALY and became cost-effective by 5 years with an ICER of $91 032 per QALY. Outcomes were robust in most 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: Bariatric surgery incurs substantial initial cost and morbidity. We found that surgery could be a cost-effective treatment for adolescents with severe obesity if assessed over a time horizon of 5 years. Our study underscores the need for long-term clinical trials in adolescents with at least 5 years of follow-up data that capture financial and quality-of-life end points.
Importance: Severe obesity affects 4% to 6% of US youth and is increasing in prevalence. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of adolescents with severe obesity is becoming more common, but data on cost-effectiveness are limited. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for adolescents with obesity using recently published results from the Teen-Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. Design, Setting, and Patients: A state-transition model was constructed to compare 2 strategies: no surgery and bariatric surgery. In the no surgery strategy, patients remained at their initial body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) over time. In the bariatric surgery strategy, patients were subjected to risks of perioperative mortality and complications as well as initial morbidity but also experienced longer-term quality-of-life improvements associated with weight loss. Cohort demographic information-of the 228 patients included, the mean (SD) age was 17 (1.6) years, the mean (range) body mass index was 53 (34-88), and 171 (75.0%) were female-surgery-related outcomes, and base case time horizon (3 years) were based on data from the Teen-Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery study. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), total costs (in US dollars adjusted to 2015-year values using the Consumer Price Index), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY was used to assess cost-effectiveness. Results: After 3 years, surgery led to a gain of 0.199 QALYs compared with no surgery at an incremental cost of $30 747, yielding an unfavorable ICER of $154 684 per QALY. When the clinical study results were extrapolated to 4 years, the ICER decreased to $114 078 per QALY and became cost-effective by 5 years with an ICER of $91 032 per QALY. Outcomes were robust in most 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: Bariatric surgery incurs substantial initial cost and morbidity. We found that surgery could be a cost-effective treatment for adolescents with severe obesity if assessed over a time horizon of 5 years. Our study underscores the need for long-term clinical trials in adolescents with at least 5 years of follow-up data that capture financial and quality-of-life end points.
Authors: Valentin Mocanu; Krista Lai; Jerry T Dang; Noah J Switzer; Daniel W Birch; Geoff D C Ball; Shahzeer Karmali Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-02-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Petter Bjornstad; Kara Hughan; Megan M Kelsey; Amy S Shah; Jane Lynch; Edward Nehus; Mark Mitsnefes; Todd Jenkins; Peixin Xu; Changchun Xie; Thomas Inge; Kristen Nadeau Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Claire B Cummins; Omar Nunez Lopez; Byron D Hughes; Deepak Adhikari; Christopher A Guidry; Samantha Stubbs; Ravi S Radhakrishnan; Kanika A Bowen-Jallow Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Janey S A Pratt; Allen Browne; Nancy T Browne; Matias Bruzoni; Megan Cohen; Ashish Desai; Thomas Inge; Bradley C Linden; Samer G Mattar; Marc Michalsky; David Podkameni; Kirk W Reichard; Fatima Cody Stanford; Meg H Zeller; Jeffrey Zitsman Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Lauren A Sarno; Steven E Lipshultz; Carroll Harmon; Nestor F De La Cruz-Munoz; Preetha L Balakrishnan Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2019-08-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: S Christopher Derderian; Luke Patten; Alexander M Kaizer; Jaime M Moore; Sarah Ogle; Todd M Jenkins; Marc P Michalsky; James E Mitchell; Petter Bjornstad; John B Dixon; Thomas H Inge Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jaime M Moore; Jacqueline J Glover; Brian M Jackson; Curtis R Coughlin; Megan M Kelsey; Thomas H Inge; Richard E Boles Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 4.734