S Christopher Derderian1, Luke Patten1, Alexander M Kaizer1, Jaime M Moore2, Sarah Ogle1, Todd M Jenkins3, Marc P Michalsky4, James E Mitchell5, Petter Bjornstad1, John B Dixon6, Thomas H Inge1. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 4. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 5. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of North Dakota, Fargo, North Dakota, USA. 6. School of Primary Health Care, Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), most adolescents experience weight loss and improvement of many obesity-associated complications (OACs). The relationship between weight loss and remission of OACs after MBS in adolescents has not been well described. METHODS: The Teen Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (Teen-LABS) is a multi-institutional prospective observational study of adolescents who underwent MBS between 2007 and 2012. Lower-weight-loss responders (LWLRs) were defined as having <20% total body weight loss (TBWL) and higher-weight-loss responders (HWLRs) were defined as having ≥20% TBWL at 5 years after MBS. The prevalence of OACs was compared at baseline and 5 years after MBS. RESULTS: Both LWLRs (n = 114) and HWLRs (n = 78) lost significant weight within the first year following MBS; however, the TBWL at 5 years for the LWLRs was 8.6% ± 9.5% compared with 33.8% ± 9.2% for the HWLRs. Those in the HWLR group were more likely to experience durable remission of composite dyslipidemia at 5 years, whereas there were no differences between groups in remission rates of all other OACs. CONCLUSIONS: Greater weight loss after MBS in adolescents was associated with greater remission of composite dyslipidemia; however, remission of other OACs was not dependent on major sustained weight loss.
OBJECTIVE: Following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), most adolescents experience weight loss and improvement of many obesity-associated complications (OACs). The relationship between weight loss and remission of OACs after MBS in adolescents has not been well described. METHODS: The Teen Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (Teen-LABS) is a multi-institutional prospective observational study of adolescents who underwent MBS between 2007 and 2012. Lower-weight-loss responders (LWLRs) were defined as having <20% total body weight loss (TBWL) and higher-weight-loss responders (HWLRs) were defined as having ≥20% TBWL at 5 years after MBS. The prevalence of OACs was compared at baseline and 5 years after MBS. RESULTS: Both LWLRs (n = 114) and HWLRs (n = 78) lost significant weight within the first year following MBS; however, the TBWL at 5 years for the LWLRs was 8.6% ± 9.5% compared with 33.8% ± 9.2% for the HWLRs. Those in the HWLR group were more likely to experience durable remission of composite dyslipidemia at 5 years, whereas there were no differences between groups in remission rates of all other OACs. CONCLUSIONS: Greater weight loss after MBS in adolescents was associated with greater remission of composite dyslipidemia; however, remission of other OACs was not dependent on major sustained weight loss.
Authors: Petter Bjornstad; Lori Laffel; Jane Lynch; Laure El Ghormli; Ruth S Weinstock; Sherida E Tollefsen; Kristen J Nadeau Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Richard F Hamman; Rena R Wing; Sharon L Edelstein; John M Lachin; George A Bray; Linda Delahanty; Mary Hoskin; Andrea M Kriska; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Judith Regensteiner; Beth Venditti; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Francesco Rubino; Michel Gagner; Paolo Gentileschi; Subhash Kini; Shoji Fukuyama; John Feng; Ed Diamond Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Markku Peltonen; Peter Jacobson; Sofie Ahlin; Johanna Andersson-Assarsson; Åsa Anveden; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Kristjan Karason; Hans Lönroth; Ingmar Näslund; Elisabeth Sjöström; Magdalena Taube; Hans Wedel; Per-Arne Svensson; Kajsa Sjöholm; Lena M S Carlsson Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thomas H Inge; Anita P Courcoulas; Todd M Jenkins; Marc P Michalsky; Michael A Helmrath; Mary L Brandt; Carroll M Harmon; Meg H Zeller; Mike K Chen; Stavra A Xanthakos; Mary Horlick; C Ralph Buncher Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nestor de la Cruz-Muñoz; Luyu Xie; Hallie J Quiroz; Onur C Kutlu; Folefac Atem; Steven E Lipshultz; M Sunil Mathew; Sarah E Messiah Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 6.532
Authors: Andrea B Goldschmidt; Jane C Khoury; James E Mitchell; Todd M Jenkins; Dale S Bond; Meg H Zeller; Marc P Michalsky; Thomas H Inge Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 9.298
Authors: Margaret S Bohm; Laura M Sipe; Madeline E Pye; Matthew J Davis; Joseph F Pierre; Liza Makowski Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2022-07-23 Impact factor: 9.237