| Literature DB >> 27783346 |
Osvalda De Giglio1, Giovanna Barbuti1, Paolo Trerotoli1, Silvia Brigida2, Angelantonio Calabrese2, Giuseppe Di Vittorio3, Grazia Lovero1, Giuseppina Caggiano1, Vito Felice Uricchio2, Maria Teresa Montagna4.
Abstract
This study represents the first investigation of microbiological groundwater pollution as a function of aquifer type and season for the Apulia region of southern Italy. Two hundred and seven wells were randomly selected from those monitored by the Regional Agency for Environmental Protection for emergency use. Both compulsory (Escherichia coli, Total Coliform, and Enterococci) and optional (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella spp., Heterotrophic Plate Count at 37 and 22 °C) microbiological parameters were assessed regularly at these wells. Groundwater from only 18 of the 207 (8.7 %) wells was potable; these all draw from karst-fissured aquifers. The remaining 189 wells draw from karst-fissured (66.1 %) or porous (33.9 %) aquifers. Of these, 82 (43.4 %) tested negative for Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa, while 107 (56.6 %) tested positive for P. aeruginosa (75.7 %), Salmonella spp. (10.3 %), or for both Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa (14 %). A logistic regression model shows that the probability of potable groundwater depends on both season and aquifer type. Typically, water samples were more likely to be potable in autumn-winter than in spring-summer periods (odds ratio, OR = 2.1; 95 % confidence interval, 95 % CI = 1.6-2.7) and from karst-fissured rather than porous aquifers (OR = 5.8; 95 % CI = 4.4-7.8). Optional parameters only showed a seasonal pattern (OR = 2.6; 95 % CI = 1.7-3.9). Clearly, further investigation of groundwater microbiological aspects should be carried out to identify the risks of fecal contamination and to establish appropriate protection methods, which take into account the hydrogeological and climatic characteristics of this region.Entities:
Keywords: Apulia; Drinking water; Fecal contamination; Groundwater; Italy; Microbiological pollution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27783346 PMCID: PMC5080310 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5655-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513
Fig. 1Distribution of aquifers in Apulia, southern Italy [from the Geological Survey of Italy]
Fig. 2Distribution of monitored wells in Apulia, southern Italy
Median values of microbial indicators defined in D. Lgs 31/01
| Microbial parameters | Karst-fissured aquifers (No. wells) | Porous aquifers (No. wells) |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gargano (21) | Salento (47) | Murgia (75) | Tavoliere (44) | Arco Jonico (20) | |||||||
| Median | Range | Median | Range | Median | Range | Median | Range | Median | Range | ||
| Compulsory* | |||||||||||
| Total coliform | 30 | 0–1500 | 0 | 0–6000 | 0 | 0–2000 | 20 | 0–2000 | 16 | 0–6000 | 0.0014 |
|
| 2 | 0–800 | 0 | 0–3000 | 0 | 0–1800 | 0 | 0–900 | 0 | 0–1600 | 0.0014 |
| Enterococci | 3 | 0–500 | 0 | 0–900 | 0 | 0–800 | 1 | 0–500 | 0 | 0–600 | 0.0014 |
| Optional** | |||||||||||
|
| 0 | 0–0 | 0 | 0–120 | 0 | 0–20 | 0 | 0–7 | 0 | 0–8 | 0.124 |
|
| 0 | 0–800 | 0 | 0–3000 | 0 | 0–900 | 0 | 0–2000 | 0 | 0–600 | 0.06 |
| HPC 22 °C | 50 | 0–900 | 2 | 0–3000 | 3 | 0–22,000 | 50 | 0–6000 | 20 | 0–2300 | 0.0014 |
| HPC 37 °C | 25 | 0–700 | 0 | 0–3000 | 0 | 0–20,000 | 20 | 0–8000 | 9 | 0–2000 | 0.0014 |
*Total coliform, Escherichia coli and Enterococci (CFU/100 ml); **Salmonella spp. (CFU/L), P. aeruginosa (CFU/250 ml), and HPC (CFU/ml)
Results of logistic regression used to evaluate factors that affect water potability in the Apulia region
| UNIVARIATE | MULTIVARIATE | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR | 95 % CI |
| OR | 95 % CI | |
| COMPULSORY PARAMETERS | ||||||
| Season: | ||||||
| autumn-winter vs. spring-summer | <0.0001 | 2.2 | 1.8–2.8 | <0.0001 | 2.1 | 1.6–2.7 |
| Aquifer: | ||||||
| karst vs. porous | <0.0001 | 4.8 | 3.6–6.4 | <0.0001 | 5.8 | 4.4–7.8 |
| Area: | ||||||
| Gargano vs. Arco Jonico | 0.0003 | 1.5 | 0.8–3.1 | Not entered | ||
| Tavoliere vs. Arco Jonico | 0.0011 | 1.9 | 1.1–3.6 | |||
| Murgia vs. Arco Jonico | <0.0001 | 11 | 6.3–19.4 | |||
| Salento vs. Arco Jonico | <0.0001 | 8.6 | 4.8–15.3 | |||
| OPTIONAL PARAMETERS | ||||||
| Season: | ||||||
| autumn-winter vs. spring-summer | 0.0007 | 1.8 | 1.3–2.6 | <0.0001 | 2.6 | 1.7–3.9 |
| Aquifer: | ||||||
| karst vs. porous | 0.2703 | 1.2 | 0.8–1.7 | Not entered | ||
| Area: | ||||||
| Gargano vs. Arco Jonico | 0.339 | 0.8 | 0.4–1.6 | Not entered | ||
| Tavoliere vs. Arco Jonico | 0.2112 | 0.8 | 0.5–1.5 | |||
| Murgia vs. Arco Jonico | 0.2505 | 0.9 | 0.5–1.5 | |||
| Salento vs. Arco Jonico | 0.0039 | 1.7 | 0.9–3.2 | |||
The odds ratio (OR) expresses the probability of potability with respect to a reference class. The reference classes are spring–summer for season; porous for aquifer type; and Arco Jonico for area