Paul N Pfeiffer1,2, Marcia Valenstein3,4, Dara Ganoczy4, Jennifer Henry4, Steven K Dobscha5,6, John D Piette3,4,7. 1. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. ppfeiffe@umich.edu. 2. VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. ppfeiffe@umich.edu. 3. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 5. VA Center for Veteran Involvement in Care, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, MI, USA. 6. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 7. University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following discharge, patients hospitalized for depression are at high risk for poor retention in outpatient care and adverse outcomes. AIMS: Pilot tests a post-hospital monitoring and enhanced support program for depression. METHOD: 48 patients at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center discharged following a depression-related inpatient stay received weekly visits or phone calls for 6 months from their choice of either a family member/friend (n = 19) or a certified peer support specialist (n = 29). Participants also completed weekly automated telephone monitoring calls assessing depressive symptoms and antidepressant medication adherence. RESULTS: Over 90% of participants were more satisfied with their care due to the service. The mean change from baseline to 6 months in depression symptoms was -7.9 (p < 0.05) according to the Patient Health Questionnaire and -11.2 (p < 0.05) according to the Beck Depression Inventory-II for those supported by a family member/friend, whereas those supported by a peer specialist had mean changes of -3.5 (p < 0.05) and -1.7 (p > 0.10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Increased contact with a chosen support person coupled with automated telephone monitoring after psychiatric hospitalization is an acceptable service for patients with depression. Those who received the service, and particularly those supported by a family member/friend, experienced reductions in symptoms of depression.
BACKGROUND: Following discharge, patients hospitalized for depression are at high risk for poor retention in outpatient care and adverse outcomes. AIMS: Pilot tests a post-hospital monitoring and enhanced support program for depression. METHOD: 48 patients at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center discharged following a depression-related inpatient stay received weekly visits or phone calls for 6 months from their choice of either a family member/friend (n = 19) or a certified peer support specialist (n = 29). Participants also completed weekly automated telephone monitoring calls assessing depressive symptoms and antidepressant medication adherence. RESULTS: Over 90% of participants were more satisfied with their care due to the service. The mean change from baseline to 6 months in depression symptoms was -7.9 (p < 0.05) according to the Patient Health Questionnaire and -11.2 (p < 0.05) according to the Beck Depression Inventory-II for those supported by a family member/friend, whereas those supported by a peer specialist had mean changes of -3.5 (p < 0.05) and -1.7 (p > 0.10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Increased contact with a chosen support person coupled with automated telephone monitoring after psychiatric hospitalization is an acceptable service for patients with depression. Those who received the service, and particularly those supported by a family member/friend, experienced reductions in symptoms of depression.
Entities:
Keywords:
Depression; Discharge; Family; Inpatient; Mobile; Monitoring; Peer support
Authors: Susan V Eisen; Mark R Schultz; Lisa N Mueller; Curt Degenhart; Jack A Clark; Sandra G Resnick; Cindy L Christiansen; Moe Armstrong; Kathryn A Bottonari; Robert A Rosenheck; Dolly Sadow Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Amy N Cohen; Amy L Drapalski; Shirley M Glynn; Deborah Medoff; Li Juan Fang; Lisa B Dixon Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: William H Sledge; Martha Lawless; David Sells; Melissa Wieland; Maria J O'Connell; Larry Davidson Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Marcia Valenstein; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Dara Ganoczy; John F McCarthy; Kara Zivin; Karen L Austin; Katherine Hoggatt; Daniel Eisenberg; John D Piette; Frederic C Blow; Mark Olfson Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Gigi Toh; Eiluned Pearce; John Vines; Sarah Ikhtabi; Mary Birken; Alexandra Pitman; Sonia Johnson Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 4.144
Authors: Jackson M Steinkamp; Nathaniel Goldblatt; Jacob T Borodovsky; Amy LaVertu; Ian M Kronish; Lisa A Marsch; Zev Schuman-Olivier Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2019-03-12