| Literature DB >> 27783045 |
Go-Eun Yi1, Arif Hasan Khan Robin2, Kiwoung Yang3, Jong-In Park4, Byung Ho Hwang5, Ill-Sup Nou6.
Abstract
Glucosinolates have anti-carcinogenic properties. In the recent decades, the genetics of glucosinolate biosynthesis has been widely studied, however, the expression of specific genes involved in glucosinolate biosynthesis under exogenous phytohormone treatment has not been explored at the subspecies level in Brassica oleracea. Such data are vital for strategies aimed at selective exploitation of glucosinolate profiles. This study quantified the expression of 38 glucosinolate biosynthesis-related genes in three B. oleracea subspecies, namely cabbage, broccoli and kale, and catalogued associations between gene expression and increased contents of individual glucosinolates under methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and salicylic acid (SA) treatments. Glucosinolate accumulation and gene expression in response to phytohormone elicitation was subspecies specific. For instance, cabbage leaves showed enhanced accumulation of the aliphatic glucoiberin, progoitrin, sinigrin and indolic neoglucobrassicin under both MeJA and SA treatment. MeJA treatment induced strikingly higher accumulation of glucobrassicin (GBS) in cabbage and kale and of neoglucobrassicin (NGBS) in broccoli compared to controls. Notably higher expression of ST5a (Bol026200), CYP81F1 (Bol028913, Bol028914) and CYP81F4 genes was associated with significantly higher GBS accumulation under MeJA treatment compared to controls in all three subspecies. CYP81F4 genes, trans-activated by MYB34 genes, were expressed at remarkably high levels in all three subspecies under MeJA treatment, which also induced in higher indolic NGBS accumulation in all three subspecies. Remarkably higher expression of MYB28 (Bol036286), ST5b, ST5c, AOP2, FMOGS-OX5 (Bol031350) and GSL-OH (Bol033373) was associated with much higher contents of aliphatic glucosinolates in kale leaves compared to the other two subspecies. The genes expressed highly could be utilized in strategies to selectively increase glucosinolate compounds in B. oleracea subspecies. These results promote efforts to develop genotypes of B. oleracea and other species with enhanced levels of desired glucosinolates.Entities:
Keywords: Brassica oleracea; biosynthetic genes; expression analysis; glucosinolates; methyl jasmonate; salicylic acid; subspecies
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27783045 PMCID: PMC6273115 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21101417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The 38 genes (blue letters) analyzed in this work, with their postions in aliphatic and indolic glucosinolate (GSL, red letters) biosynthesis pathways. A total of 15 and 23 genes were selected from aliphatic and indolic glucosinolate biosynthesis pathways, respectively. Chemical structures of the glucosinolate compounds and intermediates are presented in Figure S2.
Figure 2Quantitative PCR analyses of the expression of glucosinolate biosynthesis genes under the exogenous application of MeJA and SA. Expression was normalized to that of actin and the values in control plants were set to 1. Each data point is the average for each of the three biological replicates with three technical replicates against each biological replicate. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation of the means. Different letters indicate statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). (A) Relative expression analyses of five aliphatic transcription factor-related genes; (B) Relative expression analyses of six indolic transcription factor-related genes; (C) Relative expression analyses of 10 aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis-related genes; (D) Relative expression analyses of 17 indolic glucosinolate biosynthesis-related genes.
Contents of aliphatic and indolic glucosinolates (µmol·g−1·DW) produced under the exogenous application of MeJA and SA in three B. oleracea subspecies.
| Subspecies | Treatment | GIB | PRO | GRA | SIN | GNA | GBS | MGBS | NGBS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cabbage | Control | 0.38 ± 0.17 b | 0.58 ± 0.66 b | 0.60 ± 0.29 a | 0.57 ± 0.25 b | 0.06 ± 0.07 b | 0.66 ± 0.20 b | bdl | 0.01 ± 0.004 b |
| MeJA | 1.63 ± 0.54 a | 2.33 ± 0.44 a | 1.27 ± 0.41 a | 1.58 ± 0.22 a | 0.19 ± 0.06 ab | 7.24 ± 3.16 a | bdl | 0.04 ± 0.006 a | |
| SA | 1.40 ± 0.41 a | 2.21 ± 0.18 a | 1.75 ± 0.77 a | 1.30 ± 0.13 a | 0.25 ± 0.02 a | 1.23 ± 1.23 b | bdl | 0.04 ± 0.007 a | |
| Treatment | 0.02 | 0.006 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.008 | 0.002 | ||
| Broccoli | Control | 0.20 ± 0.02 b | 0.10 ± 0.027 a | 0.09 ± 0.009 b | 0.25 ± 0.062 ab | bdl | 0.29 ± 0.29 b | 0.01 ± 0.003 b | 0.04 ± 0.023 b |
| MeJA | 0.23 ± 0.015 ab | 0.10 ± 0.006 a | 0.08 ± 0.015 b | 0.40 ± 0.083 a | bdl | 1.46 ± 0.09 a | 0.11 ± 0.016 ab | 6.31 ± 2.07 a | |
| SA | 0.28 ± 0.025 a | 0.13 ± 0.036 a | 0.14 ± 0.02 a | 0.14 ± 0.065 b | bdl | 0.20 ± 0.16 b | 0.19 ± 0.087 a | 0.11 ± 0.024 b | |
| Treatment | 0.012 | 0.37 | 0.007 | 0.011 | <0.001 | 0.016 | 0.001 | ||
| Kale | Control | 0.11 ± 0.025 a | 7.54 ± 5.02 a | 0.20 ± 0.087 a | 4.11 ± 2.25 a | 3.02 ± 1.63 a | 0.25 ± 0.102 b | 0.02 ± 0.002 a | 0.02 ± 0.01 b |
| MeJA | 0.41 ± 0.438 a | 6.20 ± 5.54 a | 1.67 ± 2.35 a | 6.37 ± 3.93 a | 2.23 ± 1.12 a | 4.52 ± 0.817 a | 0.08 ± 0.027 a | 0.38 ± 0.24 a | |
| SA | 0.10 ± 0.058 a | 5.48 ± 3.11 a | 0.63 ± 0.735 a | 2.89 ± 0.493 a | 2.54 ± 1.43 a | 0.45 ± 0.299 b | 0.08 ± 0.055 a | 0.07 ± 0.035 ab | |
| Treatment | 0.301 | 0.864 | 0.473 | 0.326 | 0.795 | <0.001 | 0.14 | 0.041 | |
| Subspecies | <0.001 | <0.001 | NS | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.005 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Each data point is the average of three biological replicates ± standard deviation; p, probability values for statistical significance of treatment, subspecies and treatment × subspecies against each glucosinolate compound; NS, not significant; bdl, below detection limit. Different lower case letters indicate statistically significant differences (see Table S4 for the HPLC data).
Principal component analysis for indolic glucosinolate contents and relative expression of genes in three subspecies of B. oleracea in control, MeJA-treated and SA-treated plants. PC, principal component; p, statistical significance.
| GBS | −0.025 | 0.326 | −0.416 | 0.081 | −0.250 |
| MGBS | 0.253 | 0.031 | 0.030 | −0.017 | 0.345 |
| NGBS | 0.150 | 0.344 | 0.344 | −0.107 | −0.044 |
| 0.078 | 0.310 | 0.446 | 0.164 | −0.174 | |
| 0.317 | 0.098 | 0.050 | 0.012 | −0.250 | |
| 0.199 | 0.259 | −0.101 | 0.387 | 0.013 | |
| 0.053 | 0.483 | 0.163 | −0.125 | 0.171 | |
| 0.305 | −0.007 | 0.197 | 0.096 | −0.165 | |
| 0.245 | −0.071 | 0.260 | 0.272 | −0.219 | |
| 0.155 | −0.065 | 0.250 | 0.423 | −0.147 | |
| 0.210 | −0.113 | −0.321 | −0.052 | 0.041 | |
| 0.244 | −0.285 | −0.036 | −0.125 | 0.230 | |
| 0.284 | −0.090 | −0.103 | −0.045 | 0.369 | |
| 0.016 | 0.084 | 0.019 | 0.554 | 0.541 | |
| 0.296 | −0.082 | −0.018 | −0.058 | −0.153 | |
| 0.004 | 0.326 | −0.182 | −0.122 | 0.237 | |
| 0.111 | 0.349 | 0.314 | −0.344 | 0.066 | |
| 0.318 | −0.070 | −0.138 | −0.143 | −0.115 | |
| 0.304 | −0.100 | −0.152 | −0.200 | 0.116 | |
| 0.331 | 0.003 | −0.105 | −0.057 | −0.059 | |
| % variation explained | 41.5 | 15.0 | 12.7 | 7.6 | 6.3 |
| <0.01 | 0.49 | <0.01 | 0.05 | <0.01 | |
| <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.46 | <0.01 | |
| <0.01 | 0.019 | <0.01 | 0.03 | 0.16 | |
| Subspecies | |||||
| Cabbage | −1.26 ± 0.41 | −0.06 ± 0.22 | −0.57 ± 0.17 | −0.01 ± 0.26 | −0.58 ± 0.2 |
| Broccoli | 2.35 ± 0.41 | −0.15 ± 0.22 | 0.77 ± 0.17 | −0.47 ± 0.26 | −0.01 ± 0.2 |
| Kale | −1.09 ± 0.41 | 0.21 ± 0.22 | −0.19 ± 0.17 | 0.48 ± 0.26 | 0.59 ± 0.2 |
| Treatment | |||||
| Control | −1.57 ± 0.41 | −1.11 ± 0.22 | 0.63 ± 0.17 | −0.22 ± 0.26 | −0.45 ± 0.2 |
| MeJA | 0.76 ± 0.41 | 1.96 ± 0.22 | −0.61 ± 0.17 | −0.02 ± 0.26 | −0.30 ± 0.2 |
| SA | 0.81 ± 0.41 | −0.84 ± 0.22 | −0.01 ± 0.17 | 0.24 ± 0.26 | 0.75 ± 0.2 |
| Subspecies × treatment | |||||
| Cabbage × Control | −1.61 ± 0.71 | −1.09 ± 0.38 | 0.58 ± 0.30 | −0.21 ± 0.45 | −0.52 ± 0.35 |
| Cabbage × MeJA | −0.31 ± 0.71 | 1.47 ± 0.38 | −2.69 ± 0.30 | 0.24 ± 0.45 | −1.03 ± 0.35 |
| Cabbage × SA | −1.85 ± 0.71 | −0.56 ± 0.38 | 0.38 ± 0.30 | −0.05 ± 0.45 | −0.20 ± 0.35 |
| Broccoli × Control | −1.56 ± 0.71 | −1.13 ± 0.38 | 0.65 ± 0.30 | −0.23 ± 0.45 | −0.43 ± 0.35 |
| Broccoli × MeJA | 3.81 ± 0.71 | 2.52 ± 0.38 | 2.47 ± 0.30 | −0.25 ± 0.45 | −0.36 ± 0.35 |
| Broccoli × SA | 4.82 ± 0.71 | −1.85 ± 0.38 | −0.81 ± 0.30 | −0.93 ± 0.45 | 0.76 ± 0.35 |
| Kale × Control | −1.54 ± 0.71 | −1.12 ± 0.38 | 0.64 ± 0.30 | −0.23 ± 0.45 | −0.40 ± 0.35 |
| Kale × MeJA | −1.21 ± 0.71 | 1.87 ± 0.38 | −1.63 ± 0.30 | −0.05 ± 0.45 | 0.48 ± 0.35 |
| Kale × SA | −0.52 ± 0.71 | −0.11 ± 0.38 | 0.39 ± 0.30 | 1.71 ± 0.45 | 1.69 ± 0.35 |
Fold increase in relative expression of aliphatic glucosinolate transcription factor and biosynthesis genes and glucosinolate contents in kale leaves compared to cabbage and broccoli leaves for the control plants. Fold increase was calculated based on mean values obtained from three biological replicates.
| Genes | Kale: Cabbage | Kale: Broccoli |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4 | 2.3 | |
| 93 | 253 | |
| 1.6 | 15.6 | |
| 1.4 | 12.9 | |
| 1.9 | 19.1 | |
| 3.3 | 2.7 | |
| 1.1 | 2.9 | |
| 4.9 | 0.9 | |
| 1.7 | 7.8 | |
| 4.5 | 9.1 | |
| 6.8 | 1.3 | |
| 5.3 | 6.5 | |
| 2.2 | 2.7 | |
| 20.5 | 10 | |
| 16.7 | 66 | |
| GIB | 0.3 | 0.6 |
| PRO | 13 | 72 |
| GRA | 0.3 | 2.2 |
| SIN | 7.2 | 17 |
| GNA | 53 | - |
Figure 3Subspecies variation in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis-related gene expression in the control cabbage, broccoli and kale leaves. Vertical bars indicate standard deviation of means. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between subspecies at 1% level of significance in one-way ANOVA. Genes with red letters were highly expressed only in kale.
Upregulation of indolic glucosinolate transcription factor and biosynthesis genes in one subspecies compared to other two subspecies for the control plants.
| Gene Name | Accession Number | GBS (Cabbage) | NGBS (Broccoli) | MGBS (Kale) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broccoli | Kale | Cabbage | Kale | Cabbage | Broccoli | ||
| Bol007760 | 2.5 | 20.4 | |||||
| Bol017062 | 1.0 | 2.7 | |||||
| Bol036262 | 3.4 | 2.7 | |||||
| Bol013207 | 2.0 | 3.0 | |||||
| Bol030761 | 0.3 | 1.9 | |||||
| Bol026204 | 2.2 | 3.1 | |||||
| Bol026200 | 3.5 | 6.5 | |||||
| Bol039395 | 1.9 | 1.3 | |||||
| Bol032712 | 2.7 | 1.0 | |||||
| Bol032714 | 316 | 0.6 | |||||
| Bol028918 | 1.44 | 1.4 | |||||
| Bol017375 | 4.3 | 24 | |||||
| Bol017376 | 2.8 | 35 | |||||
| Bol028913 | 2.2 | 1.4 | |||||
| Bol028914 | 3.2 | 3.8 | |||||
| Bol012237 | 1.2 | 1.95 | |||||
| Bol014239 | 2.5 | 2.1 | |||||
| Bol026044 | 1.5 | 1.9 | |||||
| Bol028919 | 2.6 | 1.4 | |||||
| Bol032711 | 1.5 | 1.9 | |||||
| Bol007029 | 3.98 | 5.1 | |||||
| Bol020663 | 3.5 | 2.35 | |||||
| Bol007030 | 1.8 | 3.97 | |||||
| Content increased (fold) | 2.24 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 2.54 | α (infinity) | 17 | |