Literature DB >> 27782996

Comparison of Antibiotic-Coated versus Uncoated Porcine Dermal Matrix.

Leslie E Cohen1, Thomas A Imahiyerobo, Jeffrey R Scott, Jason A Spector.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial performance of a rifampin/minocycline-coated, non-cross-linked, acellular porcine dermal matrix (XenMatrix AB) compared to an uncoated, non-cross-linked, acellular porcine dermal matrix (Strattice) after implantation/inoculation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Escherichia coli in a dorsal rabbit model.
METHODS: Forty male New Zealand White rabbits were bilaterally implanted with XenMatrix AB or Strattice grafts and inoculated with clinically isolated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (5 × 10 colony-forming units/ml) or E. coli (1 × 10 colony-forming units/ml). At 2 and 8 weeks, sites were analyzed for viable methicillin-resistant S. aureus/E. coli colony-forming units, abscess formation, and histologic response (n = 5 rabbits per group per bacterium per time point).
RESULTS: XenMatrix AB completely inhibited bacterial colonization of the graft, inhibited abscess formation, reduced inflammation and encapsulation, and improved neovascularization compared with Strattice. XenMatrix AB implants exhibited significantly fewer colony-forming units compared with Strattice implants at 2 weeks (methicillin-resistant S. aureus) (p < 0.01) and at 2 and 8 weeks (E. coli) (p < 0.05). In addition, XenMatrix AB implants demonstrated a significantly lower abscess score at 2 weeks (methicillin-resistant S. aureus) and 8 weeks (E. coli) (p < 0.01 in both cases). For both types of bacteria and both time points evaluated, XenMatrix AB implants exhibited minimal inflammation and encapsulation and a lack of neutrophils. In contrast, Strattice implants displayed marked inflammatory and neutrophilic responses and moderate encapsulation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the antimicrobial performance of a rifampin/minocycline-coated bioprosthetic (XenMatrix AB) in a rabbit inoculation model. XenMatrix AB completely inhibited bacterial colonization of the graft, with minimal host inflammation and encapsulation, and improved neovascularization compared with Strattice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27782996     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

1.  Characterization of host response, resorption, and strength properties, and performance in the presence of bacteria for fully absorbable biomaterials for soft tissue repair.

Authors:  N F N Stoikes; J R Scott; A Badhwar; C R Deeken; G R Voeller
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Minimizing Skin Scarring through Biomaterial Design.

Authors:  Alessandra L Moore; Clement D Marshall; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2017-01-21

3.  Contamination of hybrid hernia meshes compared to bioresorbable Phasix™ Mesh in a rabbit subcutaneous implant inoculation model.

Authors:  Spencer P Lake; Nathaniel F N Stoikes; Amit Badhwar; Corey R Deeken
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-08-13

Review 4.  Antimicrobial Meshes for Hernia Repair: Current Progress and Perspectives.

Authors:  Simona Mirel; Alexandra Pusta; Mihaela Moldovan; Septimiu Moldovan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.