Sandip P Tarpada1, Wayne D Hsueh1,2, Marc J Gibber1,2. 1. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, U.S.A. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: E-learning, in its most rudimentary form, is the use of Internet-based resources for teaching and learning purposes. In surgical specialties, this definition encompasses the use of virtual patient cases, digital modeling, and online tutorials, as well as standardized video and imaging. As new technological frontiers rapidly emerge within otolaryngology, e-learning may be an effective alternative to traditional teaching. Here we present a systematic review of the literature assessing the efficacy of e-learning for otolaryngology education and a discussion of the relevance of these programs for both medical students and residents within the field. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted according to the guidelines defined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. These studies measured a range of outcomes from basic science anatomical knowledge to clinically relevant endpoints such as diagnostic accuracy. Nearly all of the studies reported greater satisfaction and/or significantly increased objective knowledge using the e-learning intervention compared to traditional techniques. CONCLUSIONS: E-learning proves to be a powerful alternative to standard teaching techniques within otolaryngology education for both residents and medical students. Future work should focus on validating specific e-learning programs and accessing long-term knowledge retention using these innovative platforms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 127:E219-E224, 2017.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: E-learning, in its most rudimentary form, is the use of Internet-based resources for teaching and learning purposes. In surgical specialties, this definition encompasses the use of virtual patient cases, digital modeling, and online tutorials, as well as standardized video and imaging. As new technological frontiers rapidly emerge within otolaryngology, e-learning may be an effective alternative to traditional teaching. Here we present a systematic review of the literature assessing the efficacy of e-learning for otolaryngology education and a discussion of the relevance of these programs for both medical students and residents within the field. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted according to the guidelines defined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. These studies measured a range of outcomes from basic science anatomical knowledge to clinically relevant endpoints such as diagnostic accuracy. Nearly all of the studies reported greater satisfaction and/or significantly increased objective knowledge using the e-learning intervention compared to traditional techniques. CONCLUSIONS: E-learning proves to be a powerful alternative to standard teaching techniques within otolaryngology education for both residents and medical students. Future work should focus on validating specific e-learning programs and accessing long-term knowledge retention using these innovative platforms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 127:E219-E224, 2017.
Authors: Sara M van Bonn; Jan S Grajek; Armin Schneider; Tobias Oberhoffner; Robert Mlynski; Nora M Weiss Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-08-23 Impact factor: 3.236
Authors: Babak Givi; Michael G Moore; Arnaud F Bewley; Charles S Coffey; Marc A Cohen; Amy C Hessel; Scharukh Jalisi; Steven Kang; Jason G Newman; Liana Puscas; Maisie Shindo; Andrew Shuman; Punam Thakkar; Donald T Weed; Ara Chalian Journal: Head Neck Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Sara M van Bonn; Jan S Grajek; Wilma Großmann; Hans E Bernd; Stefanie Rettschlag; Robert Mlynski; Nora M Weiss Journal: HNO Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 1.284
Authors: David Alexander Back; Julian Scherer; Georg Osterhoff; Lia Rigamonti; Dominik Pförringer Journal: Eur Surg Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 0.953