Literature DB >> 27781321

Effects of intrauterine retention and postmortem interval on body weight following intrauterine death: implications for assessment of fetal growth restriction at autopsy.

J Man1,2, J C Hutchinson1,2, M Ashworth1, A E Heazell3, S Levine4, N J Sebire1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: According to the classification system used, 15-60% of stillbirths remain unexplained, despite undergoing recommended autopsy examination, with variable attribution of fetal growth restriction (FGR) as a cause of death. Distinguishing small-for-gestational age (SGA) from pathological FGR is a challenge at postmortem examination. This study uses data from a large, well-characterized series of intrauterine death autopsies to investigate the effects of secondary changes such as fetal maceration, intrauterine retention and postmortem interval on body weight.
METHODS: Autopsy findings from intrauterine death investigations (2005-2013 inclusive, from Great Ormond Street Hospital and St George's Hospital, London) were collated into a research database. Growth charts published by the World Health Organization were used to determine normal expected weight centiles for fetuses born ≥ 24 weeks' gestation, and the effects of intrauterine retention (maceration) and postmortem interval were calculated.
RESULTS: There were 1064 intrauterine deaths, including 533 stillbirths ≥ 24 weeks' gestation with a recorded birth weight. Of these, 192 (36%) had an unadjusted birth weight below the 10th centile and were defined as SGA. The majority (86%) of stillborn SGA fetuses demonstrated some degree of maceration, indicating a significant period of intrauterine retention after death. A significantly greater proportion of macerated fetuses were present in the SGA population compared with the non-SGA population (P = 0.01). There was a significant relationship between increasing intrauterine retention interval and both more severe maceration and reduction in birth weight (P < 0.0001 for both), with an average artifactual reduction in birth weight of around -0.8 SD of expected weight. There was an average 12% reduction in fetal weight between delivery and autopsy and, as postmortem interval increased, fetal weight loss increased (P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Based on birth weight alone, 36% of stillbirths are classified as SGA. However, fetuses lose weight in utero with increasing intrauterine retention and continue to lose weight between delivery and autopsy, resulting in erroneous overestimation of FGR.
Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth weight; intrauterine death; maceration; postmortem interval; retention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27781321     DOI: 10.1002/uog.16018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  4 in total

1.  Identification of the optimal growth chart and threshold for the prediction of antepartum stillbirth.

Authors:  Liran Hiersch; Hayley Lipworth; John Kingdom; Jon Barrett; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Mechanisms of death in structurally normal stillbirths.

Authors:  Percy Pacora; Roberto Romero; Sunil Jaiman; Offer Erez; Gaurav Bhatti; Bogdan Panaitescu; Neta Benshalom-Tirosh; Eun Jung Jung; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Sonia S Hassan; Lami Yeo; Nicholas Kadar
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 2.716

3.  Maceration determines diagnostic yield of fetal and neonatal whole body post-mortem ultrasound.

Authors:  Susan Cheng Shelmerdine; Dean Langan; Uday Mandalia; Neil James Sebire; Owen John Arthurs
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 4.  Molecular Pathways of Cellular Senescence and Placental Aging in Late Fetal Growth Restriction and Stillbirth.

Authors:  Anna Kajdy; Jan Modzelewski; Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska; Ewa Kwiatkowska; Magdalena Bednarek-Jędrzejek; Dariusz Borowski; Katarzyna Stefańska; Michał Rabijewski; Andrzej Torbé; Sebastian Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.