Literature DB >> 32803394

Identification of the optimal growth chart and threshold for the prediction of antepartum stillbirth.

Liran Hiersch1,2,3, Hayley Lipworth4, John Kingdom5,6, Jon Barrett4,5, Nir Melamed4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the choice growth chart and threshold used to define small for gestational age (SGA) on the predictive value of SGA for placenta-related or unexplained antepartum stillbirth.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women with a singleton pregnancy who gave birth > 24 week gestation in a single center (2000-2016). The exposure of interest was SGA, defined as birth weight < 10th or < 25th centile according to three fetal growth charts (Hadlock et al., Radiology 181:129-133, 1991; intergrowth-21st (IG21), WHO 2017, and a Canadian birthweight-based reference-Kramer et al., Pediatrics 108:E35, 2001). The outcome of interest was antepartum stillbirth due to placental dysfunction or unknown etiology. Cases of stillbirth attributed to other specific etiologies were excluded.
RESULTS: A total of 49,458 women were included in the cohort. There were 103 (0.21%) cases of stillbirth due to placental dysfunction or unknown etiology. For cases in the early stillbirth cluster (≤ 30 weeks), the detection rate was high and was similar for the three ultrasound-based fetal growth charts of Hadlock, IG21, and WHO (range 83.3-87.0%). In contrast, the detection rate of SGA for cases in the late stillbirth cluster (> 30 weeks) was low, being highest for WHO and Hadlock (36.7% and 34.7%, respectively), and lowest for IG21 (18.4%). Using a threshold of the 25th centile increased the detection rate for stillbirth by approximately 15-20% compared with that achieved by the 10th centile cutoff.
CONCLUSION: At > 30 week gestation, the Hadlock or WHO fetal growth charts provided the best balance between detection rate and false positive rate for stillbirth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detection; Growth charts; Prediction; Small for gestational age; Stillbirth

Year:  2020        PMID: 32803394     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05747-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  43 in total

1.  The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.

Authors:  L J Salomon; J P Bernard; M Duyme; I Buvat; Y Ville
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Birth weight and mortality: causality or confounding?

Authors:  Olga Basso; Allen J Wilcox; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vicki Flenady; Laura Koopmans; Philippa Middleton; J Frederik Frøen; Gordon C Smith; Kristen Gibbons; Michael Coory; Adrienne Gordon; David Ellwood; Harold David McIntyre; Ruth Fretts; Majid Ezzati
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Association between delivery of small-for-gestational age neonate and long-term pediatric ophthalmic morbidity.

Authors:  Zvi Gur; Erez Tsumi; Tamar Wainstock; Eyal Walter; Eyal Sheiner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth.

Authors:  Liran Hiersch; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  A United States national reference for fetal growth.

Authors:  G R Alexander; J H Himes; R B Kaufman; J Mor; M Kogan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California.

Authors:  R L Williams; R K Creasy; G C Cunningham; W E Hawes; F D Norris; M Tashiro
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  G L Malin; R K Morris; R Riley; M J Teune; K S Khan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study.

Authors:  Jason Gardosi; Vichithranie Madurasinghe; Mandy Williams; Asad Malik; André Francis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-24

10.  Prevalence of small-for-gestational-age and its mortality risk varies by choice of birth-weight-for-gestation reference population.

Authors:  Joanne Katz; Lauren A Wu; Luke C Mullany; Christian L Coles; Anne C C Lee; Naoko Kozuki; James M Tielsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.

Authors:  Bronius Žaliūnas; Vaidilė Jakaitė; Juozas Kurmanavičius; Daiva Bartkevičienė; Kristina Norvilaitė; Karolina Passerini
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Predictive performance of newborn small for gestational age by a United States intrauterine vs birthweight-derived standard for short-term neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Nathan R Blue; Lisa Mele; William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Ronald J Wapner; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; Mona Prasad; Alan T N Tita; George R Saade; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2022-02-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.