Literature DB >> 2778050

Fertility prognosis in IVF treatment of patients with cancelled cycles.

M Van Rysselberge1, F Puissant, P Barlow, B Lejeune, A Delvigne, F Leroy.   

Abstract

Among 429 patients admitted in our in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programme during the last 3 years, 106 experienced cancellation of one or more treatment cycles. A low oestrogen (E2) response represented by far the main reason for cancellation (144/184). Significantly lower clinical pregnancy rates were found in the group of patients with low E2-cancelled cycles (E2CC) as compared to the rest of the IVF population (13 versus 37%). Further comparison between these groups showed only little or no difference in the mean age of patients, basal FSH levels, number of egg collections, rate of oocytes obtained and fertilized per trial and mean embryonic vitality score. A large majority of E2CC patients were found to belong to the tubal infertility group (75%) as opposed to a lower proportion of tubal cases among other IVF patients (56%). E2CC tubal patients showed a lower pregnancy rate than other cases with abandoned cycles and also than other tubal patients (8.9 versus 25 and 35%, respectively). Mean numbers of previous laparotomies, of attempts at oocyte retrieval and of oocytes recovered per trial were similar in tubal patients with or without E2CC. However, in the E2CC tubal group mean age and basal FSH levels were somewhat higher, whereas E2 peak values and fertilization rates were lower, leading to a greater proportion of trials without embryo transfer. Embryonic scores and the E2/P ratio at day 3 of the luteal phase did not differ significantly. It may be concluded that cancelling of a cycle because of a low E2 response in a patient with tubal infertility is indicative of a poor prognosis in further IVF trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2778050     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  In vitro fertilization with low-dose clomiphene citrate stimulation in women who respond poorly to superovulation.

Authors:  A O Awonuga; A Nabi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  In vitro fertilization outcome according to age and follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3.

Authors:  S Bassil; P A Godin; S Gillerot; J C Verougstraete; J Donnez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Does pretreatment with progestogen or oral contraceptive pills in low responders followed by the GnRHa flare protocol improve the outcome of IVF-ET?

Authors:  E al-Mizyen; L Sabatini; A M Lower; C M Wilson; T al-Shawaf; J G Grudzinskas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The prognostic importance of the number of oocytes retrieved and estradiol levels in poor and normal responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.

Authors:  J Dor; D S Seidman; I Ben-Shlomo; D Levran; A Karasik; S Mashiach
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Follicle stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3 predict ovulation stimulation response.

Authors:  A Ebrahim; G Rienhardt; S Morris; T F Kruger; C J Lombard; J P Van der Merwe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.412

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.