Literature DB >> 27780000

Complications of Diverting Ileostomy after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Carcinoma.

Sean Maroney1, Carlos Chavez de Paz, Marjunphilip Duldulao, Tracey Kim, Mark E Reeves, Kevork K Kazanjian, Naveenraj Solomon, Carlos Garberoglio.   

Abstract

There have been few studies directly comparing the postoperative complications in patients with a diverting ileostomy to patients who were not diverted after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal carcinoma. This study is a retrospective chart review of all rectal carcinoma patients (99) who underwent a LAR from January 2009 to December 2014 at Loma Linda University Medical Center and Veterans Affairs Loma Linda Healthcare System. A majority of patients were diverted (58% vs 42%). The diverted patients were more likely to have a low tumor location (P < 0.01), preoperative chemoradiation (P < 0.01), and more intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.01). Our study shows a statistically significant higher overall complication rate among patients receiving a diverting ileostomy in the six months after LAR (61% vs 38%, P = 0.02). The difference is due to a higher rate of readmission (27% vs 14%) and acute kidney injury (14% vs 5%) in patients with a diverting ileostomy. It also shows that there is a higher rate of unplanned reoperation (11% vs 6%) due to anastomotic leak (17% vs 5%) in nondiverted patients. Further studies are needed to refine the specific indications to maximize the benefit of diverting ileostomy after LAR for rectal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27780000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  5 in total

1.  Readmissions With Dehydration After Ileostomy Creation: Rethinking Risk Factors.

Authors:  Carla F Justiniano; Larissa K Temple; Alex A Swanger; Zhaomin Xu; Jenny R Speranza; Christina Cellini; Rabih M Salloum; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  When Is a Diverting Stoma Indicated after Low Anterior Resection? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials and Meta-Regression of the Risk Factors of Leakage and Complications in Non-Diverted Patients.

Authors:  Sameh Hany Emile; Sualeh Muslim Khan; Zoe Garoufalia; Emanuela Silva-Alvarenga; Rachel Gefen; Nir Horesh; Michael R Freund; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Defunctioning ileostomy reduces leakage rate in rectal cancer surgery - systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Magdalena Pisarska; Natalia Gajewska; Piotr Małczak; Michał Wysocki; Jan Witowski; Grzegorz Torbicz; Piotr Major; Magdalena Mizera; Marcin Dembiński; Marcin Migaczewski; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-17

4.  Direct inpatient costs and influencing factors for patients with rectal cancer with low anterior resection: a retrospective observational study at a three-tertiary hospital in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Zhishui Chen; Jiahua Leng; Guangying Gao; Lianhai Zhang; Yang Yang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Bowel Rest with Total Parenteral Nutrition as an Alternative to Diverting Ileostomy in High-Risk Colorectal Anastomosis: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marius Kryzauskas; Matas Jakubauskas; Neda Gendvilaite; Vilius Rudaitis; Tomas Poskus
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.