| Literature DB >> 27780000 |
Sean Maroney1, Carlos Chavez de Paz, Marjunphilip Duldulao, Tracey Kim, Mark E Reeves, Kevork K Kazanjian, Naveenraj Solomon, Carlos Garberoglio.
Abstract
There have been few studies directly comparing the postoperative complications in patients with a diverting ileostomy to patients who were not diverted after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal carcinoma. This study is a retrospective chart review of all rectal carcinoma patients (99) who underwent a LAR from January 2009 to December 2014 at Loma Linda University Medical Center and Veterans Affairs Loma Linda Healthcare System. A majority of patients were diverted (58% vs 42%). The diverted patients were more likely to have a low tumor location (P < 0.01), preoperative chemoradiation (P < 0.01), and more intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.01). Our study shows a statistically significant higher overall complication rate among patients receiving a diverting ileostomy in the six months after LAR (61% vs 38%, P = 0.02). The difference is due to a higher rate of readmission (27% vs 14%) and acute kidney injury (14% vs 5%) in patients with a diverting ileostomy. It also shows that there is a higher rate of unplanned reoperation (11% vs 6%) due to anastomotic leak (17% vs 5%) in nondiverted patients. Further studies are needed to refine the specific indications to maximize the benefit of diverting ileostomy after LAR for rectal carcinoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27780000
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am Surg ISSN: 0003-1348 Impact factor: 0.688