Literature DB >> 35915378

When Is a Diverting Stoma Indicated after Low Anterior Resection? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials and Meta-Regression of the Risk Factors of Leakage and Complications in Non-Diverted Patients.

Sameh Hany Emile1,2, Sualeh Muslim Khan3, Zoe Garoufalia1, Emanuela Silva-Alvarenga1, Rachel Gefen1, Nir Horesh1, Michael R Freund1, Steven D Wexner4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a potentially life-threatening complication after low anterior resection (LAR). This meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes of LAR with and without diverting stoma and to determine factors associated with AL in non-diverted patients.
METHODS: This was a PRISMA-compliant systematic review of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Randomized controlled trials comparing LAR with and without diverting stoma were included. Main outcome measures were AL, complications, and operation time in the two groups and risk factors of AL in non-diverted patients.
RESULTS: Nine randomized control trials (RCTs) (946 patients; 53.2% male) were included. The diverting stoma group had lower odds of complications (OR: 0.61, 95%CI: 0.461-0.828; p < 0.001), AL (OR: 0.362, 95%CI: 0.236-0.555; p < 0.001, I2 = 0), abscess (OR: 0.392, 95%CI: 0.174-0.883; p < 0.024, I2 = 0), and reoperation (OR: 0.352, 95%CI: 0.222-0.559, p < 0.001, I2 = 0) than the no-diversion group. Both groups had comparable odds of bowel obstruction, surgical site infection, and perioperative mortality. The weighted mean operation time in the diverting stoma group was longer than the no-diversion group (WMD: 34.804, 95%CI: 14.649-54.960, p < 0.001). Factors significantly associated with AL in non-diverted patients were higher body mass index (BMI), ASA ≥ 3, lower tumor height, neoadjuvant therapy, open surgery, end-to-end anastomosis, and longer operation time.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-diverted patients with increased body mass index, high American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, low rectal cancers, received neoadjuvant therapy, underwent open surgery, end-to-end anastomosis, and longer operation times were at a higher risk of AL after LAR.
© 2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diverting; Leak; Low Anterior Resection; Meta-analysis; Stoma

Year:  2022        PMID: 35915378     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05427-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.267


  40 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of perioperative selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  D Roos; L M Dijksman; J G Tijssen; D J Gouma; M F Gerhards; H M Oudemans-van Straaten
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Long-term oncologic outcomes following anastomotic leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer: does the leak severity matter?

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Fabrizio Rebecchi; Federico Famiglietti; Simone Arolfo; Alberto Arezzo; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The role of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Paul F Ridgway; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 4.  Impact of change in the surgical plan based on indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on the rates of colorectal anastomotic leak: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sameh Hany Emile; Sualeh Muslim Khan; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Quality of Life after Rectal Cancer Resection Comparing Anterior Resection, Abdominoperineal Resection, and Complicated Cases.

Authors:  Jan Scheele; Johannes Lemke; Mathias Wittau; Silvia Sander; Doris Henne-Bruns; Marko Kornmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities.

Authors:  Hannah Caulfield; Neil H Hyman
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of colorectal surgery with or without mechanical bowel preparation.

Authors:  K Slim; E Vicaut; Y Panis; J Chipponi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Mikael Machado; Jonas Nygren; Sven Goldman; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Does a stoma reduce the risk of anastomotic leak and need for re-operation following low anterior resection for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Lawrence Oh; Grahame Ctercteko; Nimalan Pathma-Nathan; Toufic El Khoury; Hamza Azam; Danette Wright; James Wei Tatt Toh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-04

Review 10.  Sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with low-lying rectal cancer: techniques, oncologic outcomes, and functional results.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Lillias Holmes Maguire; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise; Andreas M Kaiser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.