Literature DB >> 27779497

Variable Selection for Confounding Adjustment in High-dimensional Covariate Spaces When Analyzing Healthcare Databases.

Sebastian Schneeweiss1, Wesley Eddings, Robert J Glynn, Elisabetta Patorno, Jeremy Rassen, Jessica M Franklin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data-adaptive approaches to confounding adjustment may improve performance beyond expert knowledge when analyzing electronic healthcare databases and have additional practical advantages for analyzing multiple databases in rapid cycles. Improvements seemed possible if outcome predictors were reliably identified empirically and adjusted.
METHODS: In five cohort studies from diverse healthcare databases, we implemented a base-case high-dimensional propensity score algorithm with propensity score decile-adjusted outcome models to estimate treatment effects among prescription drug initiators. The original variable selection procedure based on the estimated bias of each variable using unadjusted associations between confounders and exposure (RRCE) and disease outcome (RRCD) was augmented by alternative strategies. These included using increasingly adjusted RRCD estimates, including models considering >1,500 variables jointly (Lasso, Bayesian logistic regression); using prediction statistics or likelihood-ratio statistics for covariate prioritization; directly estimating the propensity score with >1,500 variables (Lasso, Bayesian regression); or directly fitting an outcome model using all covariates jointly (Lasso, Ridge).
RESULTS: In five example studies, most tested augmentations of the base-case hdPS did not meaningfully change estimates in light of wide confidence intervals except for Bayesian regression and Lasso to estimate RRCD, which moved estimates minimally closer to the expectation in three of five examples. The direct outcome estimation with Lasso performed worst.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the basic heuristic of variable reduction in high-dimensional propensity score adjustment performed, as well as alternative approaches in diverse settings. Minor improvements in variable selection may be possible using Bayesian outcome regression to prioritize variables for propensity score estimation when outcomes are rare. See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B162.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27779497     DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  18 in total

1.  Maternal Mental Health after Custody Loss and Death of a Child: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Linkable Administrative Data.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Leslie L Roos; James Bolton; Marni Brownell; Nathan Nickel; Dan Chateau
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Theory meets practice: a commentary on VanderWeele's 'principles of confounder selection'.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Evaluating large-scale propensity score performance through real-world and synthetic data experiments.

Authors:  Yuxi Tian; Martijn J Schuemie; Marc A Suchard
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Effectiveness and safety of 110 or 150 mg dabigatran vs. vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Patrick Blin; Caroline Dureau-Pournin; Yves Cottin; Jacques Bénichou; Patrick Mismetti; Abdelilah Abouelfath; Regis Lassalle; Cécile Droz; Nicholas Moore
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  The Impact of Acute Organ Dysfunction on Long-Term Survival in Sepsis.

Authors:  Alejandro Schuler; David A Wulf; Yun Lu; Theodore J Iwashyna; Gabriel J Escobar; Nigam H Shah; Vincent X Liu
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Cys34 Adductomics Links Colorectal Cancer with the Gut Microbiota and Redox Biology.

Authors:  Hasmik Grigoryan; Courtney Schiffman; Marc J Gunter; Alessio Naccarati; Silvia Polidoro; Sonia Dagnino; Sandrine Dudoit; Paolo Vineis; Stephen M Rappaport
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Collaborative-controlled LASSO for constructing propensity score-based estimators in high-dimensional data.

Authors:  Cheng Ju; Richard Wyss; Jessica M Franklin; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jenny Häggström; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Metabolomics of neonatal blood spots reveal distinct phenotypes of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and potential effects of early-life nutrition.

Authors:  Lauren M Petrick; Courtney Schiffman; William M B Edmands; Yukiko Yano; Kelsi Perttula; Todd Whitehead; Catherine Metayer; Craig E Wheelock; Manish Arora; Hasmik Grigoryan; Henrik Carlsson; Sandrine Dudoit; Stephen M Rappaport
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Propensity Scores in Pharmacoepidemiology: Beyond the Horizon.

Authors:  John W Jackson; Ian Schmid; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2017-11-06

10.  Antidepressant Use around Conception, Prepregnancy Depression, and Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Thalia K Robakis; Carolyn E Cesta; Reem Masarwa; Deirdre J Lyell; Can Liu; Robert W Platt; Suzan L Carmichael
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.356

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.