Literature DB >> 27778419

Baseline impedance measured during high-resolution esophageal impedance manometry reliably discriminates GERD patients.

K Ravi1, D M Geno1, M F Vela1, M D Crowell2, D A Katzka1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Baseline impedance measured with ambulatory impedance pH monitoring (MII-pH) and a mucosal impedance catheter detects gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, these tools are limited by cost or patient tolerance. We investigated whether baseline impedance measured during high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) distinguishes GERD patients from controls.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with clinical HRIM and MII-pH testing were identified. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was defined by esophageal pH <4 for ≥5% of both the supine and total study time, whereas controls had an esophageal pH <4 for ≤3% of the study performed off PPI. Baseline impedance was measured over 15 seconds during the landmark period of HRIM and over three 10 minute intervals during the overnight period of MII-pH. KEY
RESULTS: Among 29 GERD patients and 26 controls, GERD patients had a mean esophageal acid exposure time of 22.7% compared to 1.2% in controls (P<.0001). Mean baseline impedance during HRIM was lower in GERD (1061 Ω) than controls (2814 Ω) (P<.0001). Baseline mucosal impedance measured during HRIM and MII-pH correlated (r=0.59, P<.0001). High-resolution esophageal manometry baseline impedance had high diagnostic accuracy for GERD, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.931 on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. A HRIM baseline impedance threshold of 1582 Ω had a sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 88.5% for GERD, with a positive predictive value of 89.3% and negative predictive value of 85.2%. CONCLUSIONS &amp; INFERENCES: Baseline impedance measured during HRIM can reliably discriminate GERD patients with at least moderate esophageal acid exposure from controls. This diagnostic tool may represent an accurate, cost-effective, and less invasive test for GERD.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GERD; baseline impedance; mucosal impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27778419     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  13 in total

1.  ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

2.  Baseline impedance via manometry and ambulatory reflux testing are not equivalent when utilized in the evaluation of potential extra-esophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Thomas A Zikos; George Triadafilopoulos; Afrin Kamal; Alexander Podboy; Irene S Sonu; Kirsten A Regalia; Monica C Nandwani; Linda A Nguyen; Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker; John O Clarke
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Daniel Sifrim; Dustin A Carlson; Mary Hawn; David A Katzka; John E Pandolfino; Roberto Penagini; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Roger Tatum; Michel Vaezi; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.960

4.  Distal Esophageal Impedance Measured by High-resolution Esophageal Manometry With Impedance Suggests the Presence of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Rahul Kataria; Benjamin Rosenfeld; Zubair Malik; Martha Harrison; Michael S Smith; Ron Schey; Henry P Parkman
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 5.  Revisiting Montreal: New Insights into Symptoms and Their Causes, and Implications for the Future of GERD.

Authors:  A Pali S Hungin; Michael Molloy-Bland; Carmelo Scarpignato
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Assessing different diagnostic tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mengyu Zhang; John E Pandolfino; Xuyu Zhou; Niandi Tan; Yuwen Li; Minhu Chen; Yinglian Xiao
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.409

7.  The Usefulness of Esophageal Baseline Impedance Levels for the Diagnosis of Nonerosive Reflux Disease and the Proper Time for Measurement in Endoscopy-negative Korean Patients With Esophageal or Supraesophageal Symptoms.

Authors:  Young-Gun Kim; Choong-Kyun Noh; Kwang Jae Lee
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.924

8.  Diagnostic yield and reliability of post-prandial high-resolution manometry and impedance-ph for detecting rumination and supragastric belching in PPI non-responders.

Authors:  Kelli DeLay; John E Pandolfino; Sabine Roman; C Prakash Gyawali; Edoardo Savarino; Michael Tye; Alexander Kaizer; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 9.  Drugs for improving esophageal mucosa defense: where are we now and where are we going?

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Patrizia Zentilin; Elisa Marabotto; Gaia Pellegatta; Claudia Coppo; Matteo Brunacci; Pietro Dulbecco; Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-17

10.  Devices for esophageal function testing.

Authors:  Rahul Pannala; Kumar Krishnan; Rabindra R Watson; Marcelo F Vela; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Amit Bhatt; Manoop S Bhutani; Juan Carlos Bucobo; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Andrew P Copland; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Nikhil A Kumta; Ryan J Law; John T Maple; Joshua Melson; Mansour A Parsi; Erik F Rahimi; Monica Saumoy; Amrita Sethi; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; Julie Yang; David R Lichtenstein
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2021-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.