K Ravi1, D M Geno1, M F Vela1, M D Crowell2, D A Katzka1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Baseline impedance measured with ambulatory impedance pH monitoring (MII-pH) and a mucosal impedance catheter detects gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, these tools are limited by cost or patient tolerance. We investigated whether baseline impedance measured during high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) distinguishes GERD patients from controls. METHODS: Consecutive patients with clinical HRIM and MII-pH testing were identified. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was defined by esophageal pH <4 for ≥5% of both the supine and total study time, whereas controls had an esophageal pH <4 for ≤3% of the study performed off PPI. Baseline impedance was measured over 15 seconds during the landmark period of HRIM and over three 10 minute intervals during the overnight period of MII-pH. KEY RESULTS: Among 29 GERD patients and 26 controls, GERD patients had a mean esophageal acid exposure time of 22.7% compared to 1.2% in controls (P<.0001). Mean baseline impedance during HRIM was lower in GERD (1061 Ω) than controls (2814 Ω) (P<.0001). Baseline mucosal impedance measured during HRIM and MII-pH correlated (r=0.59, P<.0001). High-resolution esophageal manometry baseline impedance had high diagnostic accuracy for GERD, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.931 on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. A HRIM baseline impedance threshold of 1582 Ω had a sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 88.5% for GERD, with a positive predictive value of 89.3% and negative predictive value of 85.2%. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Baseline impedance measured during HRIM can reliably discriminate GERD patients with at least moderate esophageal acid exposure from controls. This diagnostic tool may represent an accurate, cost-effective, and less invasive test for GERD.
BACKGROUND: Baseline impedance measured with ambulatory impedance pH monitoring (MII-pH) and a mucosal impedance catheter detects gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, these tools are limited by cost or patient tolerance. We investigated whether baseline impedance measured during high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) distinguishes GERDpatients from controls. METHODS: Consecutive patients with clinical HRIM and MII-pH testing were identified. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was defined by esophageal pH <4 for ≥5% of both the supine and total study time, whereas controls had an esophageal pH <4 for ≤3% of the study performed off PPI. Baseline impedance was measured over 15 seconds during the landmark period of HRIM and over three 10 minute intervals during the overnight period of MII-pH. KEY RESULTS: Among 29 GERDpatients and 26 controls, GERDpatients had a mean esophageal acid exposure time of 22.7% compared to 1.2% in controls (P<.0001). Mean baseline impedance during HRIM was lower in GERD (1061 Ω) than controls (2814 Ω) (P<.0001). Baseline mucosal impedance measured during HRIM and MII-pH correlated (r=0.59, P<.0001). High-resolution esophageal manometry baseline impedance had high diagnostic accuracy for GERD, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.931 on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. A HRIM baseline impedance threshold of 1582 Ω had a sensitivity of 86.2% and specificity of 88.5% for GERD, with a positive predictive value of 89.3% and negative predictive value of 85.2%. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Baseline impedance measured during HRIM can reliably discriminate GERDpatients with at least moderate esophageal acid exposure from controls. This diagnostic tool may represent an accurate, cost-effective, and less invasive test for GERD.
Authors: C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 12.045
Authors: Thomas A Zikos; George Triadafilopoulos; Afrin Kamal; Alexander Podboy; Irene S Sonu; Kirsten A Regalia; Monica C Nandwani; Linda A Nguyen; Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker; John O Clarke Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: C Prakash Gyawali; Daniel Sifrim; Dustin A Carlson; Mary Hawn; David A Katzka; John E Pandolfino; Roberto Penagini; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Roger Tatum; Michel Vaezi; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 3.960
Authors: Rahul Kataria; Benjamin Rosenfeld; Zubair Malik; Martha Harrison; Michael S Smith; Ron Schey; Henry P Parkman Journal: J Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2020-07-30 Impact factor: 4.924
Authors: Rahul Pannala; Kumar Krishnan; Rabindra R Watson; Marcelo F Vela; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Amit Bhatt; Manoop S Bhutani; Juan Carlos Bucobo; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Andrew P Copland; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Nikhil A Kumta; Ryan J Law; John T Maple; Joshua Melson; Mansour A Parsi; Erik F Rahimi; Monica Saumoy; Amrita Sethi; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; Julie Yang; David R Lichtenstein Journal: VideoGIE Date: 2021-10-22