OBJECTIVE: To assess short-term repeatability of an fMRI protocol widely used to assess brain control of the bladder. fMRI offers the potential to discern incontinence phenotypes as well as the mechanisms mediating therapeutic response. If so, this could enable more targeted efforts to enhance therapy. Such data, however, require excellent test-retest repeatability. METHODS: Fifty-nine older women (age ≥60 years) with urgency incontinence underwent two fMRI scans within 5-10 min with a concurrent bladder infusion/withdrawal protocol. Activity in three brain regions relevant to bladder control was compared using paired t tests and intra-class correlation. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in brain activity between the two consecutive scans in the regions of interest. Intra-class correlation was 0.19 in the right insula, 0.32 in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area, and 0.44 in the medial pre-frontal cortex. Such correlations are considered fair or poor, but are comparable to those from studies of other repeated fMRI tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evaluation of the repeatability of a bladder fMRI protocol. The technique used provides a framework for comparing different fMRI protocols applied to brain-bladder research. Despite universal patient response to the stimulus, brain response had limited repeatability within individuals. Improvement of the investigational protocol should magnify brain response and reduce variability. These results suggest that although analysis of fMRI data among groups of subjects yields valuable insight into bladder control, fMRI is not yet appropriate for evaluation of the brain's role in continence on an individual level.
OBJECTIVE: To assess short-term repeatability of an fMRI protocol widely used to assess brain control of the bladder. fMRI offers the potential to discern incontinence phenotypes as well as the mechanisms mediating therapeutic response. If so, this could enable more targeted efforts to enhance therapy. Such data, however, require excellent test-retest repeatability. METHODS: Fifty-nine older women (age ≥60 years) with urgency incontinence underwent two fMRI scans within 5-10 min with a concurrent bladder infusion/withdrawal protocol. Activity in three brain regions relevant to bladder control was compared using paired t tests and intra-class correlation. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in brain activity between the two consecutive scans in the regions of interest. Intra-class correlation was 0.19 in the right insula, 0.32 in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area, and 0.44 in the medial pre-frontal cortex. Such correlations are considered fair or poor, but are comparable to those from studies of other repeated fMRI tasks. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evaluation of the repeatability of a bladder fMRI protocol. The technique used provides a framework for comparing different fMRI protocols applied to brain-bladder research. Despite universal patient response to the stimulus, brain response had limited repeatability within individuals. Improvement of the investigational protocol should magnify brain response and reduce variability. These results suggest that although analysis of fMRI data among groups of subjects yields valuable insight into bladder control, fMRI is not yet appropriate for evaluation of the brain's role in continence on an individual level.
Authors: Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; Christof van der Horst; Christina Pott; Stephan Wolff; Arya Nabavi; Olav Jansen; Klaus P Jünemann Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; C van der Horst; S Wolff; N Filippow; A Nabavi; O Jansen; P M Braun Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-01-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Anna Poggesi; Giovanni Pracucci; Hugues Chabriat; Timo Erkinjuntti; Franz Fazekas; Ana Verdelho; Michael Hennerici; Peter Langhorne; John O'Brien; Philip Scheltens; Marieke C Visser; Milita Crisby; Gunhild Waldemar; Anders Wallin; Domenico Inzitari; Leonardo Pantoni Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-08-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ilse M Groenendijk; Ulrich Mehnert; Jan Groen; Becky D Clarkson; Jeroen R Scheepe; Bertil F M Blok Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 3.240