Literature DB >> 2777678

Field matching considerations in craniospinal irradiation.

M Tatcher1, A S Glicksman.   

Abstract

Radiotherapy of the craniospinal axis in leukemia and medulloblastoma patients usually involves parallel-opposed lateral cranial fields adjacent and orthogonal to a posterior spinal field. Most current treatment protocols require rotation of the cranial fields to compensate for the divergence of the spinal field such that the adjacent field edges abut along the match line in the mid-saggital plane. Some departments introduce gaps up to 1-2 cm wide between the matched fields out of concern for overdosing the spinal cord. The behavior of the dose distribution was studied in the junction region of divergence-compensated fields as the separation of their edges varied from 0.5 cm overlap to a gap 1 cm wide. Composite dose profiles and isodose maps were calculated for 60Co and 4 MV photon beams using static and moving junction (feathering) techniques. When the fields are appropriately matched there is no gap between them in the mid-saggital plane and the dose varies smoothly across the junction. Gapping of divergence-compensated fields is detrimental to dose uniformity, producing underdosage in a volume that extends to all depths in the body. With proper localization, there is no way that the commonly accepted critical dose for myelopathy can be exceeded in typical treatments of leukemia patients. It can occur in the treatment of medulloblastoma patients only in the unlikely situation where there is gross overlapping of the adjacent fields. Feathering may be considered as a safety margin against spinal cord damage in medulloblastoma but it is superfluous in leukemia. The importance of treatment machine quality assurance and verification of patient set up geometry are emphasized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2777678     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90080-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  [A simple device for improving the reproducibility of patient positioning in craniospinal irradiation].

Authors:  P Geyer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  HIT '91 (prospective, co-operative study for the treatment of malignant brain tumors in childhood): accuracy and acute toxicity of the irradiation of the craniospinal axis. Results of the quality assurance program.

Authors:  R D Kortmann; B Timmermann; J Kühl; N Willich; M Flentje; C Meisner; M Bamberg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Estimation of radiation-induced second cancer risk associated with the institutional field matching craniospinal irradiation technique: A comparative treatment planning study.

Authors:  Hemalatha Athiyaman; Athiyaman Mayilvaganan; Arun Chougule; Mary Joan; Harvinder Singh Kumar
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-07-08

4.  Method to plan, administer, and verify supine craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Eric E Klein; Russell Gerber
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  A light field-based method to adjust rounded leaf end MLC position for split shape dose calculation correction in a radiation therapy treatment planning system.

Authors:  Jia-Ming Wu; Tsair-Fwu Lee; Chung-Ming Kuo; Ching-Jiang Chen; Shyh-An Yeh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Assessment of the results and hematological side effects of 3D conformal and IMRT/ARC therapies delivered during craniospinal irradiation of childhood tumors with a follow-up period of five years.

Authors:  Zoltán Lőcsei; Róbert Farkas; Kornélia Borbásné Farkas; Klára Sebestyén; Zsolt Sebestyén; Zoltán Musch; Ágnes Vojcek; Noémi Benedek; László Mangel; Gábor Ottóffy
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Practical aspects of the application of helical tomotherapy for craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Joongyo Lee; Euidam Kim; Nalee Kim; Hwa Kyung Byun; Chang-Ok Suh; Yoonsun Chung; Hong In Yoon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A light-field-based method to adjust on-axis rounded leaf end MLC position to predict off-axis MLC penumbra region dosimetric performance in a radiation therapy planning system.

Authors:  Jia-Ming Wu; Tsair-Fwu Lee; Shyh-An Yeh; Kuan-Yin Hsiao; Hsin-Hsiung Chen; Pei-Ju Chao; Yi-Ting Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Acute toxicity profile of craniospinal irradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in children with medulloblastoma: A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Maurice C Cox; Johannes M Kusters; Corrie E Gidding; Jolanda H Schieving; Erik J van Lindert; Johannes H Kaanders; Geert O Janssens
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.481

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.