| Literature DB >> 27776352 |
Sinead Toomey1, Stephen F Madden2, Simon J Furney3, Yue Fan4, Mark McCormack5, Carragh Stapleton5, Mattia Cremona1, Gianpiero L Cavalleri5, Malgorzata Milewska1, Naomi Elster1, Aoife Carr1, Joanna Fay6, Elaine W Kay6, Susan Kennedy7, John Crown7, William M Gallagher4, Bryan T Hennessy1,8, Alex J Eustace1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab treatment for women with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) resulted in the significant improvement of both relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). However, many women who are classified as HER2-positive do not respond. Many studies have focused on the role of somatic mutations rather than germline polymorphisms in trastuzumab resistance.Entities:
Keywords: ERBB-family germline mutations; high depth sequencing; single nucleotide polymorphisms; survival impact
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27776352 PMCID: PMC5342757 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Impact of ERBB-family SNPs on relapse free and overall survival of HER2-positive BC patients who have received adjuvant trastuzumab as part of their therapeutic regimen (n = 194)
| Gene | Protein Domain | Accession number | SNP | R/MA allele | RFS HR (95% CI) | Adjusted | OS HR (95% CI) | Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Receptor ligand | rs2072454 | N158N | C/T | 1.03 (0.43–2.48) | 0.96 | 0.96 | 4.01 (1.53–10.69) | 4.8 × 10−3 | 0.05 | |
| GFR | rs2227983 | T584T | T/A | 0.90 (0.38–2.14) | 0.80 | 0.89 | 1.51 (0.43–5.38) | 0.52 | 0.95 | |
| Trans membrane | rs10258429 | H656H | C/T | 0.72 (0.38–1.38) | 0.32 | 0.78 | 1.41 (0.58–3.44) | 0.44 | 0.95 | |
| Protein kinase | rs1050171 | Q787Q | G/A | 1.17 (0.39–3.55) | 0.78 | 0.89 | 1.11 (0.31–3.93) | 0.88 | 0.95 | |
| Protein kinase | rs1140475 | T903T | C/T | 1.05 (0.25–4.40) | 0.95 | 0.95 | ||||
| NDD | rs2293347 | D994D | G/C | 1.38 (0.66–2.91) | 0.39 | 0.78 | ||||
| Trans membrane | rs1136201 | I655V | A/G | 1.07 (0.52–2.23) | 0.85 | 0.95 | ||||
| NDD | rs1058808 | P1170A | C/G | 0.68 (0.23–1.95) | 0.47 | 0.78 | 0.87 (0.29–2.57) | 0.80 | 0.95 | |
| Receptor ligand | rs2229046 | I390I | T/C | 1.85 (0.81–3.67) | 0.15 | 0.51 | ||||
| NDD | rs2271189 | R1116R | G/A | 1.28 (0.54–3.07) | 0.57 | 0.81 | 0.94 (0.32–2.70) | 0.90 | 0.95 |
SNP = Single nucleotide polymorphism; RFS = Relapse Free Survival; OS = overall survival; HR = Hazard Ratio; R = reference allele; MA = minor allele.
Figure 1The prognostic role of 4 SNPs in trastuzumab treated primary tumours (n = 194)
In each plot the black, grey and dotted grey lines represent the samples with the wild type (reference), heterozygous and mutant (minor) alleles respectively. Kaplan Meier estimates of (A) the ERBB2-I655V SNP where RFS is the survival endpoint (HR = 1.79 (CI = 1.00–3.19), p = 0.17), (B) the EGFR-T903T SNP, where RFS is the survival endpoint (HR = 3.52, (CI = 1.38–8.97), p = 0.05), (C) the EGFR-D994D SNP, where OS is the survival endpoint (HR = 3.13 (CI = 1.19–8.33), p = 0.08), and in this case there were no samples with the minor allele (no green line) and (D) the EGFR-N151N SNP, where OS is the survival endpoint (HR = 4.01 (CI = 1.53–10.69), p = 0.05). * indicates a significant p-value after multiple testing correction.
Figure 2Forest plot of the impact of ERBB-family SNPs on (A) relapse free survival and (B) Overall survival of HER2-positive BC patients who have received adjuvant trastuzumab as part of their therapeutic regimen (n = 194)
Hazard ratios, confidence intervals and p-values were calculated using Cox regression analysis, where an adjusted p-value of < = 0.05 was considered significant. Significant SNPs are marked on the plot.
Comparison of the allele frequencies of ERBB-family SNPs between the Irish HER2-Positive BC cohort and the 1000 Genomes UK and Chinese Han cohorts
| Gene | Protein Change | Accession number | HER2-IRE MAF | 1kG-GBR MAF | 1kG-CHB MAF | HER2 IRE vs 1kG GBR | HER2 IRE vs 1kG CHB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted | Adjusted | ||||||||
| rs2072454 | 0.416 | 0.54 | 0.44 | 0.014 | 0.04 | 0.566 | 0.57 | ||
| rs2227984 | 0.125 | 0.3 | 0.48 | 9.12xe-06 | 4.56xe-05 | 1.27xe-16 | 1.91xe-15 | ||
| rs10258429 | 0.088 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.591 | 0.81 | 0.135 | 0.17 | ||
| rs1050171 | 0.357 | 0.64 | 0.17 | 9.80xe-09 | 7.35xe-08 | 9.86xe-06 | 2.11xe-05 | ||
| rs1140475 | 0.125 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.760 | 0.88 | 0.007 | 0.01 | ||
| rs2293347 | 0.092 | 0.07 | 0.26 | 0.481 | 0.72 | 2.18xe-06 | 5.45xe-06 | ||
| rs1136201 | 0.247 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.653 | 0.82 | 0.049 | 0.07 | ||
| rs1058808 | 0.275 | 0.65 | 0.52 | 2.34xe-14 | 3.50xe-13 | 2.02xe-07 | 1.01xe-06 | ||
| rs2229046 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.034 | 0.08 | 1.40xe-06 | 4.21xe-06 | ||
| rs2271189 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.921 | 0.99 | 0.438 | 0.47 | ||
MAF = Mutant Allele Frequency; IRE = Ireland (n = 239); 1 kG GBR = 1000 Genomes Study participants from Great Britain (n = 91); 1kG CHB = 1000 Genomes Study participants from Beijing, China (n = 103).