Literature DB >> 27775407

Positivity bias in judging ingroup members' emotional expressions.

Talya Lazerus1, Zachary A Ingbretsen2, Ryan M Stolier3, Jonathan B Freeman3, Mina Cikara2.   

Abstract

We investigated how group membership impacts valence judgments of ingroup and outgroup members' emotional expressions. In Experiment 1, participants, randomized into 2 novel, competitive groups, rated the valence of in- and outgroup members' facial expressions (e.g., fearful, happy, neutral) using a circumplex affect grid. Across all emotions, participants judged ingroup members' expressions as more positive than outgroup members' expressions. In Experiment 2, participants categorized fearful and happy expressions as being either positive or negative using a mouse-tracking paradigm. Participants exhibited the most direct trajectories toward the "positive" label for ingroup happy expressions and an initial attraction toward positive for ingroup expressions of fear, with outgroup emotion trajectories falling in between. Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 2 and demonstrated that the effect could not be accounted for by targets' gaze direction. Overall, people judged ingroup faces as more positive, regardless of emotion, both in deliberate and implicit judgments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27775407     DOI: 10.1037/emo0000227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  7 in total

1.  How White American Children Develop Racial Biases in Emotion Reasoning.

Authors:  Ashley L Ruba; Ryan McMurty; Sarah E Gaither; Makeba Parramore Wilbourn
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  The black sheep effect: The case of the deviant ingroup robot.

Authors:  Andrew Steain; Christopher John Stanton; Catherine J Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Social connectedness and negative affect uniquely explain individual differences in response to emotional ambiguity.

Authors:  Maital Neta; Rebecca L Brock
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter.

Authors:  Roza G Kamiloğlu; Akihiro Tanaka; Sophie K Scott; Disa A Sauter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Culture-free perceptual invariant for trustworthiness.

Authors:  Ce Mo; Irene Cristofori; Guillaume Lio; Alice Gomez; Jean-René Duhamel; Chen Qu; Angela Sirigu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Commentary: A Neural Mechanism of Social Categorization.

Authors:  Xiaoming Jiang; Ryan Sanford
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Emotion perception bias associated with the hijab in Austrian and Turkish participants.

Authors:  Sebastian Korb; Tugba Ceren Deniz; Bengi Ünal; Alasdair Clarke; Giorgia Silani
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.143

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.