Literature DB >> 27774758

A prospective evaluation of a standardized strategy for the use of a polymeric everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Rationale and design of the BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT study.

Alfonso Ielasi1, Attilio Varricchio2, Gianluca Campo3, Massimo Leoncini4, Bernardo Cortese5, Paolo Vicinelli6, Salvatore Brugaletta7, Fortunato Scotto di Uccio8, Azeem Latib9, Maurizio Tespili1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and the clinical results following a prespecified bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) implantation strategy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. BACKGROUNDS: Concerns raised about the BVS safety in STEMI setting because a not negligible thrombosis rate was reported within 30 days and 12 months after implantation. Technical procedural issues related to the structural BVS features were advocated as probable causes for the thrombotic events.
METHODS: This is an investigators-owned and -directed, prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm multicenter registry intended to obtain data from 500 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with BVS (1.1 or GT1) following a prespecified implantation protocol. The study is recorded in ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier: NCT02601781.
RESULTS: The primary endpoint is a device-oriented composite end-point (DOCE) of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction clearly attributable to the intervention culprit vessel and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization within 30 days after the index procedure. The DOCE will be assessed even at 6-month, 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: This will be the first study investigating the feasibility and the early- and long-term clinical impact of a prespecified BVS implantation protocol in thrombotic lesions causing STEMI. Here, we describe the rationale and the design of the study.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute myocardial infarction; angioplasty; bioresorbable scaffold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27774758     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  Bioresorbable scaffolds and drug-eluting balloons for the management of spontaneous coronary artery dissections.

Authors:  Vasileios F Panoulas; Alfonso Ielasi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  BRS implantation in long lesions requiring device overlapping: myth or reality?

Authors:  Simone Biscaglia; Andrea Erriquez; Davide Bernucci; Giulia Bugani; Enrico Favaretto; Gianluca Campo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Are acute coronary syndromes an ideal scenario for bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation?

Authors:  Elisabetta Moscarella; Alfonso Ielasi; Maria Carmen De Angelis; Fortunato Scotto di Uccio; Enrico Cerrato; Roberta De Rosa; Gianluca Campo; Attilio Varricchio
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  The impact of the 3-year ABSORB II trial results on my clinical practice: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Matteo Serenelli; Simone Biscaglia; Elisabetta Tonet; Arnaldo Poli; Elisa Nicolini; Alfonso Ielasi; Andrea Erriquez; Gianluca Campo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Long-term outcome of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Alberto Polimeni; Remzi Anadol; Thomas Münzel; Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.