Literature DB >> 27774614

Blood component transfusion and wastage rates in the setting of massive transfusion in three regional trauma centers.

Nancy M Dunbar1,2, Nicholas J Olson1, Zbigniew M Szczepiorkowski1,2, Eric D Martin3, Ryan M Tysarcyk4, Darrell J Triulzi4,5, Louis H Alarcon6, Mark H Yazer4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) is to provide large quantities of blood products rapidly to exsanguinating patients. The expected rates of blood product transfusion and wastage in this setting have not been defined. This study was undertaken to assess the transfusion and wastage rates for bleeding patients requiring emergency issue of blood components at three American Level I trauma centers. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Three hospitals participated, all of which are Level I trauma centers that have MTPs in place where uncrossmatched red blood cells (RBCs) can be ordered with or without platelets (PLTs), plasma, and cryoprecipitate. Data on the transfusion, return to blood bank, and wastage rates were recorded on all products issued within 3 hours after MTP activation.
RESULTS: The majority of products were issued to the emergency department and/or operating room at all three institutions (84%-95%). The percentage of RBCs, plasma, and PLTs transfused during MTPs were 39% to 65%, 43% to 66%, and 75% to 100%, respectively. Wastage rates were comparable for RBCs (0%-9%), plasma (0%-7%), and PLTs (0%-7%). Cryoprecipitate had the highest wastage rates at all three sites (7%-33%).
CONCLUSION: A large portion of blood products issued during MTPs are not transfused. Some are wasted due to stringent storage requirements and/or limited shelf lives. The optimum ratio of transfused to returned products in these patients is likely to be determined more by clinical need than by transfusion service policy.
© 2016 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27774614     DOI: 10.1111/trf.13880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  3 in total

1.  How well does your massive transfusion protocol perform? A scoping review of quality indicators.

Authors:  Brenton Sanderson; Enrico Coiera; Lia Asrianti; Jeremy Field; Lise J Estcourt; Erica M Wood
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Quality Improvement Project of a Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) to Reduce Wastage of Blood Components.

Authors:  Matteo Paganini; Hesham Abowali; Gerardo Bosco; Maha Balouch; Garrett Enten; Jin Deng; Aryeh Shander; David Ciesla; Jason Wilson; Enrico Camporesi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Blood shortages and changes to massive transfusion protocols: Survey of hospital practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jeremy W Jacobs; Garrett S Booth
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.596

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.