| Literature DB >> 27774456 |
Maryam Bello-Akinosho1, Rosina Makofane2, Rasheed Adeleke3, Mapitsi Thantsha4, Michael Pillay5, George Johannes Chirima6.
Abstract
Restoration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon- (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27774456 PMCID: PMC5059645 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5798593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Some physical and chemical characteristics of the soil.
| pH (H2O) | EC (mS/m) | Fe (mg/kg) | Cu (mg/kg) | Zn (mg/kg) | Total C (%) | Total N (%) | P Bray 1 (mg/kg) | CEC (cmol/kg) | Particle size (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sand | Silt | Clay | |||||||||
| 7.60 | 0.52 | 49.72 | 2.09 | 3.63 | 0.232 | 0.31 | 28.93 | 13.917 | 76.0 | 8.0 | 16.0 |
OTUs in relation to the phyla and the number of sequences they contain. The OTUs were computed using mothur software pipeline [26].
| OTUs | Number of sequences | Accession numbers of sequences | Genus | Phylum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU 1 | 1 | KR185703_10_5A4 |
| Proteobacteria |
| OTU 2 | 1 | KR185716_10_5A8 |
| Actinobacteria |
| OTU 3 | 2 | KR185719_10_6A1, KR185718_10_3A2 |
| Proteobacteria |
| OTU 4 | 1 | KU216390_10_7A4 |
| Proteobacteria |
| OTU 5 | 1 | KM578849_10_1E |
| Actinobacteria |
| OTU 6 | 2 | KM578846_10_1C, KR185712_10_8A5 |
| Proteobacteria |
| OTU 7 | 1 | KU216391_10_9A4 |
| Bacteriodetes |
| OTU 8 | 2 | KR185715_10_1B2, KR185714_10_1B1 |
| Actinobacteria |
| OTU 9 | 2 | KR185731_10_1B3, KR185732_10_7A3 |
| Actinobacteria |
| OTU 10 | 2 | KR185730_10_11A, KR185729_10_9A3 |
| Firmicutes |
| OTU 11 | 17 | KR185710_10_8A4, KR185713_10_11C, KR185697_10_3A3, KR185709_10_8A3, KR185696_10_3A1, KR185701_10_4A4, KR185693_10_1A8, KR185695_10_2A3, KR185706_10_6A2, KR185699_10_4A2, KR185704_10_5A5, KM578847_10_1B, KR185700_10_4A3, KR185707_10_7A6, KR185702_10_5A3, KR185705_10_5A7, KR185698_10_4A1 |
| Proteobacteria |
| OTU 12 | 2 | KU216393_10_11F, KU216392_10_9A6 |
| Proteobacteria |
| OTU 13 | 5 | KM578848_10_1D, KR185727_10_11G, KR185726_10_11E, KR185725_10_11D, KR185723_10_7A2 |
| Actinobacteria |
| OTU 14 | 1 | KU216394_10_11H |
| Proteobacteria |
| OTU 15 | 1 | KR185728_10_11J |
| Actinobacteria |
| OTU 16 | 3 | KR185720_10_9A5, KR185722_10_11M, KR185721_10_11K |
| Proteobacteria |
Figure 1Evolutionary relationships of isolated soil bacteria. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor-joining method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method. Salmonella typhimurium was used as the outgroup. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGA6. One bacterial genus representing each OTU identified is depicted. The sequence analysis was carried out using mothur software in which 16 OTUs were generated at similarities of 97%. The relatives of the representative OTUs were obtained from NCBI. The nucleotides sequences of the representative OTUs showed a range of 98% to 100% identity with the homologous sequences reported in GenBank.
Figure 2Plate showing phosphate solubilization colony size and halo size.
Figure 3Principal component analysis (PCA) of the 44 isolates in relation to their abilities to solubilize phosphate (PSI) and produce indoleacetic acid (IAA) as a function of their potential ability to contribute to soil fertility.
Figure 4Phosphate solubilization indices of the groups of isolates.
Figure 5Indoleacetic acid production of the groups of isolates.