| Literature DB >> 27774280 |
Pablo Hernández-Alonso1, Raquel Garijo1, José M Cuevas1, Rafael Sanjuán1.
Abstract
Experimental evolution studies have shown that RNA viruses respond rapidly to directional selection and thus can adapt efficiently to changes in host cell tropism, antiviral drugs, or other imposed selective pressures. However, the evolution of RNA viruses under relaxed selection has been less extensively explored. Here, we evolved vesicular stomatitis virus in mouse embryonic fibroblasts knocked-out for PKR, a protein with a central role in antiviral innate immunity. Vesicular stomatitis virus adapted to PKR-negative mouse embryonic fibroblasts in a gene-specific manner, since the evolved viruses exhibited little or no fitness improvement in PKR-positive cells. Full-length sequencing revealed the presence of multiple parallel nucleotide substitutions arising in independent evolution lines. However, site-directed mutagenesis showed that the effects of these substitutions were not PKR dependent. In contrast, we found evidence for sign epistasis, such that a given substitution which was positively selected was strongly deleterious when tested as a single mutation. Our results suggest that virus evolution in cells with specific innate immunity defects may drive viral specialization. However, this process is not deterministic at the molecular level, probably because the fixation of mutations which are tolerated under a relaxed selection regime is governed mainly by random genetic drift.Entities:
Keywords: PKR; attenuation; epistasis; experimental evolution; parallel evolution; vesicular stomatitis virus
Year: 2015 PMID: 27774280 PMCID: PMC5014476 DOI: 10.1093/ve/vev008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virus Evol ISSN: 2057-1577
Figure 1.VSV adaptation to pkr-/- MEFs. (A) Growth curve of the five evolved lines (filled circles) and the founder (T0) virus (open circles). Each line was assayed in triplicate. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. (B) Competition assays of the T0 and evolved viruses against a common, phenotypically marked competitor in pkr -/- MEFs. Each line represents the change in the ratio of the assayed virus to the common competitor after a single 24 h transfer and corresponds to one replicate assay. Four replicates were performed for each competition. (C) Competition assays in pkr +/+ MEFs were performed in the same way as in (B).
Growth parameters of the five lines adapted to PKR-negative MEFs.
| Line | Growth rate (h–1) | Maximal yield (PFU/ml × 10–7) | Decay rate (h–1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 1.27 ± 0.21 | 0.02 ± 0.01 |
| L1 | 0.66 ± 0.00*** | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| L2 | 0.64 ± 0.00*** | 4.48 ± 1.25 | 0.04 ± 0.02 |
| L3 | 0.63 ± 0.02*** | 3.33 ± 0.91 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| L4 | 0.57 ± 0.02*** | 2.61 ± 0.52 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| L5 | 0.63 ± 0.03*** | 5.09 ± 0.93 | 0.05 ± 0.02 |
*P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001 (t-test against T0).
Figure 2.Serial transfers in pkr -/- MEFs select for a small-plaque phenotype in PKR-positive cells. (A) Plaque assays of the T0 virus and line L2 (transfer 40) in BHK-21 cells and in pkr +/+ MEFs. (B) Fixation of the small-plaque phenotype (assayed in BHK-21 cells) during evolution. Approximately 100 plaques from a single plaque assay were counted to determine the small/total plaque ratio. Small plaques were not observed before passage 22 and reached quasi-fixation in all lines except L1 by transfer 35.
Genetic changes detected in the five lines adapted to PKR-negative MEFs.
| Genome | Gene | Residue | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1282U | N | None | − | − | − | + | − |
| C2649U | M | H134Y | − | − | + | − | − |
| G2686A | M | G146E | − | + | − | − | + |
| U3030C | Inter | None | + | − | − | − | − |
| G3351A | G | E92K | − | + | + | − | + |
| A3460C | G | Q128P | + | − | − | + | − |
| G3837A | G | E254K | − | + | + | + | + |
| C4180A | G | T368K | + | − | − | − | − |
| G4182A | G | E369K | + | − | − | − | − |
| U4397C | G | None | − | − | + | − | − |
| A4730G | Inter | None | − | − | − | + | − |
| G5557A | L | None | + | − | − | − | − |
| A5700U | L | D323V | + | − | − | − | − |
| A6931G | L | None | − | − | + | − | − |
| U7369C | L | None | − | − | + | − | − |
| U7522C | L | None | − | − | + | − | − |
| G7591A | L | None | + | − | − | − | − |
| A8320G | L | None | + | − | − | − | − |
| A8679C | L | D1316A | − | + | − | − | + |
| C10224U | L | T1831M | + | + | − | + | − |
| C10282A | L | None | − | − | + | − | − |
| A11090G | Trailer | None | − | + | − | − | + |
Figure 3.Individual fitness effects of parallel substitutions. (A) Competition assays of the T0 and single mutants against a common, phenotypically marked competitor in pkr -/- MEFs. Each line represents the change in the ratio of the assayed virus to the common competitor after a single 24 h transfer. Three replicates were performed for each competition. (B) Competition assays in pkr +/+ MEFs. (C) Correlation between fitness in pkr −/− and pkr +/+ cells. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean
Figure 4.Effect of the A11090G mutation on the predicted secondary structure of the trailer. The minimum free energy (MFE) structure predicted by the RNAfold program is shown for the T0 (top) and A11090G (bottom) trailers. Numbers indicate genome positions. The mutated base is circled. In the predicted MFE structure, the single-base substitution modified 14 neighboring base pairs, as indicated