Literature DB >> 27774154

Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research.

Edward S Dove1, Bartha M Knoppers1, Ma'n H Zawati1.   

Abstract

Although increasingly global, data-driven genomics and other 'omics'-focused research hold great promise for health discoveries, current research ethics review systems around the world challenge potential improvements in human health from such research. To overcome this challenge, we propose a 'Safe Harbor Framework for International Ethics Equivalency' that facilitates the harmonization of ethics review of specific types of data-driven international research projects while respecting globally transposable research ethics norms and principles. The Safe Harbor would consist in part of an agency supporting an International Federation for Ethics Review (IFER), formed by a voluntary compact among countries, granting agencies, philanthropies, institutions, and healthcare, patient advocacy, and research organizations. IFER would be both a central ethics review body, and also a forum for review and follow-up of policies concerning ethics norms for international research projects. It would be built on five principle elements: (1) registration, (2) compliance review, (3) recognition, (4) monitoring and enforcement, and (5) public participation. The Safe Harbor would create many benefits for researchers, countries, and the general public, and may eventually have application beyond (gen)omics to other areas of biomedical research that increasingly engage in secondary use of data and present only negligible risks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomedical research; ethics; genomics; governance; harmonization; safe harbor

Year:  2014        PMID: 27774154      PMCID: PMC5033519          DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lst002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Biosci        ISSN: 2053-9711


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts.

Authors:  Brent Daniel Mittelstadt; Luciano Floridi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The challenge of local consent requirements for global critical care databases.

Authors:  Stuart McLennan; David Shaw; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Oversight of EU medical data transfers - an administrative law perspective on cross-border biomedical research administration.

Authors:  Jane Reichel
Journal:  Health Technol (Berl)       Date:  2017-03-07

Review 4.  Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings.

Authors:  Susan Bull; Phaik Yeong Cheah; Spencer Denny; Irene Jao; Vicki Marsh; Laura Merson; Neena Shah More; Le Nguyen Thanh Nhan; David Osrin; Decha Tangseefa; Douglas Wassenaar; Michael Parker
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  An ethics safe harbor for international genomics research?

Authors:  Edward S Dove; Bartha M Knoppers; Ma'n H Zawati
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 11.117

6.  Human genome editing: how to prevent rogue actors.

Authors:  Beverley A Townsend
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing.

Authors:  Bonginkosi Shozi; Tamanda Kamwendo; Julian Kinderlerer; Donrich W Thaldar; Beverley Townsend; Marietjie Botes
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.903

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.