Literature DB >> 27773945

Cross-Language Activation Begins During Speech Planning and Extends Into Second Language Speech.

April Jacobs1, Melinda Fricke2, Judith F Kroll2.   

Abstract

Three groups of native English speakers named words aloud in Spanish, their second language (L2). Intermediate proficiency learners in a classroom setting (Experiment 1) and in a domestic immersion program (Experiment 2) were compared to a group of highly proficient English-Spanish speakers. All three groups named cognate words more quickly and accurately than matched noncognates, indicating that all speakers experienced cross-language activation during speech planning. However, only the classroom learners exhibited effects of cross-language activation in their articulation: Cognate words were named with shorter overall durations, but longer (more English-like) voice onset times. Inhibition of the first language during L2 speech planning appears to impact the stages of speech production at which cross-language activation patterns can be observed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cascading processing; cognate effect; cross-language activation; second language speech

Year:  2015        PMID: 27773945      PMCID: PMC5068572          DOI: 10.1111/lang.12148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Learn        ISSN: 0023-8333


  21 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: an empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production.

Authors:  C T Kello; D C Plaut; B MacWhinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-09

3.  Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts.

Authors:  Janet G Van Hell; Ton Dijkstra
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  Articulatory duration in single-word speech production.

Authors:  Markus F Damian
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Time course of inhibitory processes in bilingual language processing.

Authors:  María Cruz Martín; Pedro Macizo; Teresa Bajo
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2010-02-24

6.  On the effects of second language immersion on first language production.

Authors:  Cristina Baus; Albert Costa; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-02-24

7.  Language switching makes pronunciation less nativelike.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Elin Runnqvist; Albert Costa
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-02-06

8.  Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: evidence for phonetic category formation.

Authors:  J E Flege; W Eefting
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning.

Authors:  Jared A Linck; Judith F Kroll; Gretchen Sunderman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-11-09

10.  When bilinguals choose a single word to speak: Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of the native language.

Authors:  Maya Misra; Taomei Guo; Susan C Bobb; Judith F Kroll
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bilinguals' twisted tongues: Frequency lag or interference?

Authors:  Chuchu Li; Matthew Goldrick; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

2.  Using automated acoustic analysis to explore the link between planning and articulation in second language speech production.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Yosi Shrem; Oriana Kilbourn-Ceron; Cristina Baus; Joseph Keshet
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Phonetic variation in bilingual speech: A lens for studying the production-comprehension link.

Authors:  Melinda Fricke; Judith F Kroll; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.059

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.