| Literature DB >> 27770771 |
Y Huo1, Z C Jing2, X F Zeng3, J M Liu4, Z X Yu5, G C Zhang6, Y Li7, Y Wang8, Q S Ji9, P Zhu10, B X Wu11, Y Zheng12, P P Wang13, J Li13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although several new drugs have been approved in recent years, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains a rapidly progressive disease with a poor prognosis. Ambrisentan, a selective endothelin type A antagonist, has been approved for treatment of PAH. This open label study assessed the efficacy and safety of ambrisentan in Chinese subjects with PAH.Entities:
Keywords: Ambrisentan; Chinese; Exercise capacity; Pulmonary arterial hypertension
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27770771 PMCID: PMC5075402 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-016-0361-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Demographic and baseline characteristics (ITT population)
| Ambrisentan ( | |
|---|---|
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 36 (10.3) |
| Gender, | |
| Men/women | 20 (15)/113 (85) |
| Ethnicity, | |
| Not Hispanic or Latino ethnicity | 133 (100) |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 21.5 (3.2) |
| PAH classification, | |
| PAH associated with connective tissue disease | 71 (53.4) |
| Idiopathic PAH | 47 (35.3) |
| PAH associated with congenital heart disease | 12 (9.0) |
| Heritable PAH | 3 (2.3) |
| 6MWD, m, mean (SD) | 377.1 (61.3) |
| WHO PAH functional classification, | |
| Class II | 70 (52.6) |
| Class III | 63 (47.4) |
| BDI, mean (SD) | 2.5 (1.4) |
| NT-ProBNP (ng/L), mean (SD) | 1600.7 (1832.84) |
BMI body mass index, PAH pulmonary arterial hypertension, 6MWD 6-Minutes Walk Distance, WHO World Health organization, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, BDI Borg Dyspnoea Index, ITT intent-to-treat
Extent of drug exposure during study
| Exposure | Ambrisentan ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Evaluation Period | Dosage-adjustment Period | |||
| Combined Ambrisentana | Ambrisentan 10 mg | |||
| Exposure (days) |
| 134 | 127 | 73 |
| Mean (SD) | 83.0 (9.13) | 82.8 (5.59) | 75.8 (16.02) | |
| Median | 85.0 | 83.0 | 83.0 | |
| Min, Max | 31, 90 | 34, 94 | 27, 87 | |
| Range of exposure, |
| 134 | 127 | 73 |
| <=28 days | 0 | 0 | 2 (2.7) | |
| 29–56 days | 5 (3.7) | 2 (1.6) | 12 (16.4) | |
| 57–84 days | 37 (27.6) | 90 (70.9) | 44 (60.3) | |
| > = 85 days | 92 (68.7) | 35 (27.6) | 15 (20.5) | |
| Average of daily dose (mg) |
| 134 | 127 | 73 |
| Mean (SD) | 4.95 (0.170) | 7.81 (2.462) | 10.11 (0.346) | |
| Median | 4.94 | 9.04 | 10.12 | |
| Min, Max | 4.4, 6.5 | 4.8, 11.5 | 8.5, 11.5 | |
aCombined for all subjects who received Ambrisentan 5 mg and Ambrisentan 10 mg in Dosage adjustment Period
Change from baseline in 6MWD, BDI scores, WHO functional classification and NT-proBNP levels after ambrisentan treatment (ITT population)
| Efficacy measures | Baseline | Week 12 | Week 24 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6MWD, meters (LOCF) | |||
|
| 133 | 133 | 133 |
| Mean (SD) | 377.1 (61.30) | +53.6 (64.50) | +64.4 (91.17) |
| * | <0.001 (42.5; 64.7) | <0.001 (48.7; 80.0) | |
| BDI scores (LOCF) | |||
|
| 133 | 133 | 133 |
| Mean (SD) | 2.5 (1.37) | −0.3 (1.52) | −0.2 (1.95) |
|
| <0.001 | 0.003 | |
| WHO functional classification, | |||
|
| - | 133 | 133 |
| Improved by class 1/2 | 44 (33.1)/0 | 51 (38.3)/0 | |
| No change | 84 (63.2) | 77 (57.9) | |
| Worsened by class 1/2 | 4 (3.0)/1 (0.8) | 3 (2.3)/2 (1.5) | |
| NT-proBNP levels, ng/L (Observed data) | |||
|
| 132 | 123 | 122 |
| Mean (SD) | 1600.7 (1832.84) | −861.4 (1452.96) | −806.0 (1384.00) |
|
|
|
| |
LOCF last observation carry forward, 6MWD 6-Minutes Walk Distance, BDI Borg Dyspnoea Index, WHO World Health Organisation, ITT intent-to-treat
*P-value calculated from paired T-test. P-value was derived from Wilcoxon signed-rank test. P < 0.05 indicated statistically significant difference from baseline
Fig. 1Improvement in 6MWD over 24 weeks following ambrisentan treatment (LOCF) (ITT population). Note: Mean (SD) baseline value for 6MWD was 377.1 (61.30) meters. AMB: ambrisentan
Most frequent (≥5 %) adverse events during ambrisentan treatment (safety population) by maximum Intensity
| Adverse events | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any adverse events, n (%) | 52 (38.8) | 32 (23.9) | 7 (5.2) | 91 (67.9) |
| Oedema peripheral | 10 (7.5) | 5 (3.7) | 0 | 15 (11.2) |
| Flushing | 10 (7.5) | 1 (0.7) | 0 | 11 (8.2) |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | 8 (6.0) | 1 (0.7) | 0 | 9 (6.7) |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 7 (5.2) | 2 (1.5) | 0 | 9 (6.7) |
| Blood bilirubin increased | 8 (6.0) | 1 (0.7) | 0 | 9 (6.7) |
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | 4 (3.0) | 3 (2.2) | 0 | 7 (5.2) |
| Headache | 7 (5.2) | 0 | 0 | 7 (5.2) |
| Nausea | 4 (3.0) | 3 (2.2) | 0 | 7 (5.2) |
All the events of peripheral oedema and flushing were reported to be related to the study drug
Fig. 2Kaplan-Meier plot for time to clinical worsening (safety population)