BACKGROUND: Delayed postexercise heart rate recovery (HRR) has been associated with disability and poor prognosis in chronic cardiopulmonary diseases. The usefulness of HRR to predict exercise impairment and mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), however, remains largely unexplored. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with PAH of varied etiology (New York Heart Association classes I-IV) and 21 age- and gender-matched controls underwent a maximal incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), with heart rate being recorded up to the fifth minute of recovery. RESULTS: Heart rate recovery was consistently lower in the patients compared with the controls (P < .05). The best cutoff for HRR in 1 minute (HRR(1 min)) to discriminate the patients from the controls was 18 beats. Compared with patients with HRR(1 min) ≤ 18 (n = 40), those with HRR(1 min) >18 (n = 32) had better New York Heart Association scores, resting hemodynamics and 6-minute walking distance. In fact, HRR(1 min) >18 was associated with a range of maximal and submaximal CPET variables indicative of less severe exercise impairment (P < .05). The single independent predictor of HRR(1 min) ≤ 18 was the 6-minute walking distance (odds ratio [95% CI] 0.99 [0.98-1.00], P < .05). On a multiple regression analysis that considered only CPET-independent variables, HRR(1 min) ≤ 18 was the single predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [95% CI] 1.19 [1.03-1.37], P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Preserved HRR(1 min) (>18 beats) is associated with less impaired responses to incremental exercise in patients with PAH. Conversely, a delayed HRR(1 min) response has negative prognostic implications, a finding likely to be clinically useful when more sophisticated (and costlier) analyses provided by a full CPET are not available.
BACKGROUND: Delayed postexercise heart rate recovery (HRR) has been associated with disability and poor prognosis in chronic cardiopulmonary diseases. The usefulness of HRR to predict exercise impairment and mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), however, remains largely unexplored. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with PAH of varied etiology (New York Heart Association classes I-IV) and 21 age- and gender-matched controls underwent a maximal incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), with heart rate being recorded up to the fifth minute of recovery. RESULTS: Heart rate recovery was consistently lower in the patients compared with the controls (P < .05). The best cutoff for HRR in 1 minute (HRR(1 min)) to discriminate the patients from the controls was 18 beats. Compared with patients with HRR(1 min) ≤ 18 (n = 40), those with HRR(1 min) >18 (n = 32) had better New York Heart Association scores, resting hemodynamics and 6-minute walking distance. In fact, HRR(1 min) >18 was associated with a range of maximal and submaximal CPET variables indicative of less severe exercise impairment (P < .05). The single independent predictor of HRR(1 min) ≤ 18 was the 6-minute walking distance (odds ratio [95% CI] 0.99 [0.98-1.00], P < .05). On a multiple regression analysis that considered only CPET-independent variables, HRR(1 min) ≤ 18 was the single predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [95% CI] 1.19 [1.03-1.37], P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Preserved HRR(1 min) (>18 beats) is associated with less impaired responses to incremental exercise in patients with PAH. Conversely, a delayed HRR(1 min) response has negative prognostic implications, a finding likely to be clinically useful when more sophisticated (and costlier) analyses provided by a full CPET are not available.
Authors: Marcelle Paula-Ribeiro; Indyanara C Ribeiro; Liliane C Aranda; Talita M Silva; Camila M Costa; Roberta P Ramos; Jaquelina S Ota-Arakaki; Sergio L Cravo; Luiz E Nery; Michael K Stickland; Bruno M Silva Journal: J Physiol Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Matthew R Lammi; Brianne Aiello; Gregory T Burg; Tayyab Rehman; Ivor S Douglas; Arthur P Wheeler; Bennett P deBoisblanc Journal: Chest Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Kristin Haraldsdottir; Andrew M Watson; Arij G Beshish; Dave F Pegelow; Mari Palta; Laura H Tetri; Melissa D Brix; Ryan M Centanni; Kara N Goss; Marlowe W Eldridge Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Omer Hinc Yilmaz; Ugur Nadir Karakulak; Engin Tutkun; Ceylan Bal; Meside Gunduzoz; Emine Ercan Onay; Mehmet Ayturk; Mujgan Tek Ozturk; Mehmet Erdem Alaguney Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Maria Clara Noman de Alencar; Manoel Otávio da Costa Rocha; Márcia Maria de Oliveira Lima; Henrique Silveira Costa; Giovane Rodrigo Sousa; Renata de Carvalho Bicalho Carneiro; Guilherme Canabrava Rodrigues Silva; Fernando Vieira Brandão; Lucas Jordan Kreuser; Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro; Maria Carmo Pereira Nunes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240