Literature DB >> 27769547

Predictive factors and outcomes of negative appendectomy.

Byeong Geon Jeon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess predictive factors for negative appendectomy and to evaluate the outcomes of negative appendectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 4,878 patients who underwent appendectomy at our institution from January 2008 to December 2014 was performed.
RESULTS: Younger age (≤15 years), normal white blood cell count, appendix diameter of less than 6 mm on computed tomography (CT), and CT grade less than 3 were found to be independent predictive factors for negative appendectomy. When complications were investigated according to the results of pathologic diagnosis, negative appendectomy had more complications than appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis, and this was statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: When CT findings are equivocal, in deciding to operate for acute appendicitis, additional ultrasonography can be performed. Furthermore, if the patient is younger than 15 years and the white blood cell count is normal, it is recommended to monitor changes in symptoms a little longer rather than operating hastily.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Negative appendectomy; Outcome; Predictive factor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27769547     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Banreet Dhindsa; Yassin Naga; Alexander Praus; Syed Mohsin Saghir; Harmeet Mashiana; Daryl Ramai; Saurabh Chandan; Harlan Sayles; Amaninder Dhaliwal; Ishfaq Bhat; Shailender Singh; Douglas Adler
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  The Unacceptable Morbidity of Negative Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.

Authors:  Matthew G R Allaway; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: How to discourage surgeons using inadequate therapy.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Takafumi Machimoto; Yoshio Kadokawa; Toshiyuki Hata; Tatsuo Ito; Shigeru Kato; Daiki Yasukawa; Yuki Aisu; Yusuke Kimura; Maho Sasaki; Yuichi Takamatsu; Taku Kitano; Shigeo Hisamori; Tsunehiro Yoshimura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A five-year longitudinal observational study in morbidity and mortality of negative appendectomy in Sulaimani teaching Hospital/Kurdistan Region/Iraq.

Authors:  Hiwa Omer Ahmed; Rizgar Muhedin; Amir Boujan; Aso Hama Saeed Aziz; Ara Muhamad Abdulla; Rezan Ahmed Hardi; Aso Ahmed Abdulla; Taban Aziz Sidiq
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Negative Appendicectomy Rate: Incidence and Predictors.

Authors:  Khaled Noureldin; Ali Asgar Hatim Ali; Mohamed Issa; Heer Shah; Bolu Ayantunde; Abraham Ayantunde
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-22

6.  The Role of Alvarado Score in Predicting Acute Appendicitis and Its Severity in Correlation to Histopathology: A Retrospective Study in a Qatar Population.

Authors:  Mohannad Al-Tarakji; Ahmad Zarour; Rajvir Singh; Mohamed Said Ghali
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-15

7.  Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Patients with a Normal White Blood Cell Count; A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sadettin Er; Bülent Çomçalı; Ahmet Soykurt; Bülent Cavit Yüksel; Mesut Tez
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-04

8.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Thomas Jaschinski; Christoph G Mosch; Michaela Eikermann; Edmund Am Neugebauer; Stefan Sauerland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.