| Literature DB >> 27769268 |
Brenda F Narice1, Nicola H Green2, Sheila MacNeil2, Dilly Anumba3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During labour, the cervix undergoes a series of changes to allow the passage of the fetoplacental unit. While this visible transformation is well-described, the underlying and causative microscopic changes, in which collagen plays a major role, are poorly understood and difficult to visualise. Recent studies in mice and humans have shown that Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) microscopy, a non-destructive imaging technique, can detect changes in the cervical collagen. However, the question of whether SHG can identify changes in the arrangement of cervical collagen at different physiological stages still needs addressing. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the cervical collagen alignment between pre- and postmenopausal women using SHG and to generate proof-of-concept data prior to assessing this technique in pregnancy.Entities:
Keywords: Alignment; Cervix; Collagen; Human; Menopause; Second harmonic generation microscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27769268 PMCID: PMC5073459 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-016-0204-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of sample orientation. a Direction of scanning was carried out from cephalic to caudal with the cervix placed in anatomical position. b SHG image Z-stacks were collected from the cervical stroma adjacent to the endocervical canal as illustrated in a transverse view of the cervix
Fig. 2Effect of collagenase on cervical sample. PBS-preserved cervical sample scanned with SHG before and after 3-h incubation with collagenase A (same field of view)
Fig. 3Collagen fibres as seen in the human cervix using Second Harmonic Generation. SHG signal of collagen shows less alignment of collagen fibres in premenopausal (top) than in postmenopausal samples (bottom) of cervical tissue. Cervical samples were imaged with confocal microscope, and representative images are shown. All images correspond to central areas of the cervix. Amplifier gain and offset were adjusted individually for each image to improve visualisation of collagen fibres but power excitation was kept constant
Difference in the dispersion of collagen fibres
| Menopausal status | Mean dispersion difference (°) 95 % CI | SD of dispersion difference (°) |
|---|---|---|
| Premenopausal | 5.39 (3.30–7.48) | 12.68 |
| Postmenopausal | −1.58 (-2.9–-0.23) | 8.24 |
Fig. 4Schematic representation of the difference in the dispersion of collagen fibres based on menopausal status. Quantitative comparison of collagen alignment between premenopausal and postmenopausal cervical samples measured in degrees. The bars represent the mean difference in deviation for pre- and postmenopausal groups respectively (in absolute values) which is statistically significant with p < 0.01. Error bars indicate 95 % CI interval confidence for the mean difference in dispersion