Ravinder Bamba1, Thanapong Waitayawinyu, Ratnam Nookala, David Colton Riley, Richard B Boyer, Kevin W Sexton, Chinnakart Boonyasirikool, Sunyarn Niempoog, Nathaniel D Kelm, Mark D Does, Richard D Dortch, Robert Bruce Shack, Wesley P Thayer. 1. From the Department of Plastic Surgery (R.B., R.N., D.C.R., R.B.B., K.W.S., R.B.S., W.P.T.), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of General Surgery (R.B.), Georgetown University, Washington, DC; Department of Orthopaedics (T.W., C.B., S.N.), Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand; Georgetown University School of Medicine (D.C.R.), Washington, DC; Department of General Surgery (K.W.S.), University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (N.D.K., M.D.D., R.D.D.), Nashville, TN; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (R.D.D.), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; and Department of Biomedical Engineering (R.D.D.), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury can have a devastating impact on our military and veteran population. Current strategies for peripheral nerve repair include techniques such as nerve tubes, nerve grafts, tissue matrices, and nerve growth guides to enhance the number of regenerating axons. Even with such advanced techniques, it takes months to regain function. In animal models, polyethylene glycol (PEG) therapy has shown to improve both physiologic and behavioral outcomes after nerve transection by fusion of a portion of the proximal axons to the distal axon stumps. The objective of this study was to show the efficacy of PEG fusion in humans and to retrospectively compare PEG fusion to standard nerve repair. METHODS: Patients with traumatic lacerations involving digital nerves were treated with PEG after standard microsurgical neurorrhaphy. Sensory assessment after injury was performed at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months using static two-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing. The Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) for Sensory Recovery Scale was used to evaluate the level of injury. The PEG fusion group was compared to patient-matched controls whose data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Four PEG fusions were performed on four nerve transections in two patients. Polyethylene glycol therapy improves functional outcomes and speed of nerve recovery in clinical setting assessed by average MRCC score in week 1 (2.8 vs 1.0, p = 0.03). At 4 weeks, MRCC remained superior in the PEG fusion group (3.8 vs 1.3, p = 0.01). At 8 weeks, there was improvement in both groups with the PEG fusion cohort remaining statistically better (4.0 vs 1.7, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Polyethylene glycol fusion is a novel therapy for peripheral nerve repair with proven effectiveness in animal models. Clinical studies are still in early stages but have had encouraging results. Polyethylene glycol fusion is a potential revolutionary therapy in peripheral nerve repair but needs further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury can have a devastating impact on our military and veteran population. Current strategies for peripheral nerve repair include techniques such as nerve tubes, nerve grafts, tissue matrices, and nerve growth guides to enhance the number of regenerating axons. Even with such advanced techniques, it takes months to regain function. In animal models, polyethylene glycol (PEG) therapy has shown to improve both physiologic and behavioral outcomes after nerve transection by fusion of a portion of the proximal axons to the distal axon stumps. The objective of this study was to show the efficacy of PEG fusion in humans and to retrospectively compare PEG fusion to standard nerve repair. METHODS:Patients with traumatic lacerations involving digital nerves were treated with PEG after standard microsurgical neurorrhaphy. Sensory assessment after injury was performed at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months using static two-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing. The Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) for Sensory Recovery Scale was used to evaluate the level of injury. The PEG fusion group was compared to patient-matched controls whose data were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Four PEG fusions were performed on four nerve transections in two patients. Polyethylene glycol therapy improves functional outcomes and speed of nerve recovery in clinical setting assessed by average MRCC score in week 1 (2.8 vs 1.0, p = 0.03). At 4 weeks, MRCC remained superior in the PEG fusion group (3.8 vs 1.3, p = 0.01). At 8 weeks, there was improvement in both groups with the PEG fusion cohort remaining statistically better (4.0 vs 1.7, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION:Polyethylene glycol fusion is a novel therapy for peripheral nerve repair with proven effectiveness in animal models. Clinical studies are still in early stages but have had encouraging results. Polyethylene glycol fusion is a potential revolutionary therapy in peripheral nerve repair but needs further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.
Authors: G D Bittner; C P Keating; J R Kane; J M Britt; C S Spaeth; J D Fan; A Zuzek; R W Wilcott; W P Thayer; J M Winograd; F Gonzalez-Lima; T Schallert Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Danielle M Wojtkiewicz; James Saunders; Leahthan Domeshek; Christine B Novak; Vicki Kaskutas; Susan E Mackinnon Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2015-06
Authors: A B Lore; J A Hubbell; D S Bobb; M L Ballinger; K L Loftin; J W Smith; M E Smyers; H D Garcia; G D Bittner Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1999-04-01 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: D C Riley; G D Bittner; M Mikesh; N L Cardwell; A C Pollins; C L Ghergherehchi; S R Bhupanapadu Sunkesula; T N Ha; B T D Hall; A D Poon; M Pyarali; R B Boyer; A T Mazal; N Munoz; R C Trevino; T Schallert; W P Thayer Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Charles L Rodriguez-Feo; Kevin W Sexton; Richard B Boyer; Alonda C Pollins; Nancy L Cardwell; Lillian B Nanney; R Bruce Shack; Michelle A Mikesh; Christopher H McGill; Christopher W Driscoll; George D Bittner; Wesley P Thayer Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: K S Houschyar; A Momeni; M N Pyles; J Y Cha; Z N Maan; D Duscher; O S Jew; F Siemers; J van Schoonhoven Journal: Plast Surg Int Date: 2016-01-20
Authors: Michelle Mikesh; Cameron L Ghergherehchi; Robert Louis Hastings; Amir Ali; Sina Rahesh; Karthik Jagannath; Dale R Sengelaub; Richard C Trevino; David M Jackson; George D Bittner Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Michelle Mikesh; Cameron L Ghergherehchi; Sina Rahesh; Karthik Jagannath; Amir Ali; Dale R Sengelaub; Richard C Trevino; David M Jackson; Haley O Tucker; George D Bittner Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Cameron L Ghergherehchi; Michelle Mikesh; Dale R Sengelaub; David M Jackson; Tyler Smith; Jacklyn Nguyen; Jaimie T Shores; George D Bittner Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2018-12-23 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Angel F Farinas; Alonda C Pollins; Michael Stephanides; Dillon O'Neill; Salam Al-Kassis; Isaac V Manzanera Esteve; Juan M Colazo; Patrick R Keller; Timothy Rankin; Blair A Wormer; Christodoulos Kaoutzanis; Richard D Dortch; Wesley P Thayer Journal: Neurol Res Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 2.448
Authors: George D Bittner; Jared S Bushman; Cameron L Ghergherehchi; Kelly C S Roballo; Jaimie T Shores; Tyler A Smith Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 8.322